Apple’s Pippin console launched 30 years ago today — shunned by the public as too expensive and too slow, only 42,000 units were sold
PowerPC-era entertainment platform was discontinued shortly after Steve Jobs returned to the helm.
Apple’s Pippin was plucked from the tree 30 years ago today. But it turned out to be a rotten Apple, which failed to catch the interest of the public, despite it being heralded as an open standard for home entertainment. From its launch on April 21, 1996, this expensive device with lethargic performance only sold ~42,000 units worldwide. The Pippin was put out of its misery shortly after Steve Jobs returned to the helm in 1997.
The promise of Pippin
Development of the Pippin began shortly after Japanese entertainment firm Bandai approached Apple, hoping to collaborate on a CD-ROM-based living room entertainment system. According to various sources, the project expanded from a scaled-down (680X0 era) Mac that could play games directly from CD-ROMs to a much broader home entertainment device packing a PowerPC chip.
Initial marketing pitched the Pippin as “an integral part of the consumer audiovisual, stereo, and television environment.” Interestingly, Apple didn’t want to be the sole brand behind Pippins, and the devices were ultimately made by Bandai and Katz Media.
Perhaps Apple thought its transition from Motorola 680X0 to PowerPC chips gave its new hardware an unbeatable console performance profile for the time. But despite its computing performance, the early PowerPC chips would be outmaneuvered and outclassed by the broad swing to 3D gaming in 1995/96, which the Sony PlayStation, Sega Saturn, and Nintendo 64 all successfully capitalized on and grew.
Compared to those rivals, the Pippin looked like a rehashed version of the old guard. Like a CPU-accelerated version of the 3DO or CD32 machines that had already slid by the wayside. Thus, the Pippin definitely failed to catch the coattails of the mid-1990s zeitgeist.
Pippin hardware / software
As we’ve said, the Pippin was based on the PowerPC architecture, which Apple had recently begun transitioning to. These new chips were doing an admirable job making Macs look computationally competitive with Wintel PC clones again, but consoles and home entertainment – and the new era of 3D gaming – would shift public desires. Additionally, the Pippin’s chip, a low-end of the range PowerPC 603 @ 66 MHz, wasn’t one of the best.
Other key specs of the Pippin were its 6MB of shared memory, 128KB SRAM for saves (no HDD), and its 4x CD-ROM. There were no custom chips to offload graphics or audio processing; the single-core PPC would have to do everything.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Another drag on the Pippin was likely the chosen OS. It used a stripped-down version of Apple’s old System 7.5.2 at launch. This OS was long in the tooth at the time, and was well known for its less-than-ideal cooperative multitasking, lack of protected memory, and 68K emulation overhead. It may have been tolerable on a desktop, but it wasn’t ready-made for a slick home entertainment box.
The Pippin also suffered from a weak entertainment software library, say sources like Wikipedia. But perhaps that issue was overshadowed by the pricing of $599 (≈$1,200 today), which was double the price of the stunning-for-the-time PlayStation (PS1) or triple the price of the aggressively priced but remarkable N64.
The Pippin platform was discontinued globally in 1997, but Japanese partners would continue to hold out, unaware that the living room entertainment war was over for Apple, until 2002.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
JeffreyP55 Warm spot in my heart for the Motorola 68xxx series. From the 68000 and for me ended with the 68040. Amiga computers, never Apple. Ok, back to the boring Pippin story....Reply -
bit_user Reply
Yeah, that's pretty much what I remember about it. Fairly lackluster hardware specs and not cheap. Not a great game library.The article said:The Pippin also suffered from a weak entertainment software library, say sources like Wikipedia. But perhaps that issue was overshadowed by the pricing of $599 (≈$1,200 today), which was double the price of the stunning-for-the-time PlayStation (PS1)
The price wasn't outrageous, considering what 3DO launched at ($700 in late 1993). If Pippin had full compatibility with MacOS apps, then I think $600 would've been quite reasonable.
However, like with the Newton, I think Apple was onto something. The main issues were probably their execution and timing. -
hwertz Yeah, Pippin was 'technically' an open standard because they used PREP (powerpc reference platform) but this was basically used by apple, and possibly IBM (for their POWER CPUs) at the time, But that just covered like booting, the hardware was all Apple specific. (I'm not disputing the article, Apple made claims about the spec being open.)Reply
The big issue with this would have been, I *used* PowerMacs of that era (the early ones where it was like Nubus 68K board with PowerPC instead of a 68040), and the shared memory graphics were slow, one of those deals where you couild pull down a menu and watch it quickly draw it. Pippin was just a roughly Powermac 6100 (but with 603 instead of 601), and the 6100 was not fast (I don't mean compared to later models either, I mean some 68040 models outran it.) -
bit_user Reply
Okay, but the article says Pippin used a PowerPC 603.JeffreyP55 said:Warm spot in my heart for the Motorola 68xxx series. -
alan.campbell99 Indeed, there were some PowerPC accelerators developed for Amigas so tangentially related :nomouth:Reply
Not that I ever saw one, I couldn't afford to do much with the A500 I was using, not even a 68020 card. -
TerryLaze Reply
Where was the future back when we needed it?! :Palan.campbell99 said:Indeed, there were some PowerPC accelerators developed for Amigas so tangentially related :nomouth:
Not that I ever saw one, I couldn't afford to do much with the A500 I was using, not even a 68020 card.
Now you can just stick a raspberry to a sidecard expansion and have all the risc CPU you can ever need on an a500.
https://bigl.es/pi-news-lazarustorm-raspberrypi-amiga500/