Crysis - 8800gt

Hyder

Distinguished
Jun 15, 2008
11
0
18,510
hi
could somebody explain to me why some people are bashing crysis so badly about hardware requirements?
i mean its the best game i've every played and my 8800gt runs it fine with all settings on high, AA 2x, 1200*1600 (my monitor is 22" so i cannot increase the resolution)
i get over 30fps, there is no lagging ever, even during explosion
 

Oh Snap

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2008
414
0
18,780
That's because you're running it on High, 1600x1200, and still only managing ~30fps. Are you using Vista or XP?

Also, fraps screenshot in core please, I'd love to see what FPS you're hitting there :)
 

Hyder

Distinguished
Jun 15, 2008
11
0
18,510
xp
umm i am shure it is more than 30fps
i havent used fraps but i can tell it is around 45 - 50
when i put AA 4x, thats when it goes down to 30
 

Oh Snap

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2008
414
0
18,780

Imo use fraps, first off. Second, you're using XP so of course performance is going to be way better because you're not using DirectX 10 at all. Run it in vista, directx 10 and you're going to hit the wall.

It's a highly demanding game, and even with Tri-SLI 8800GTX's @ 2560x1600, Very High all in DX10, although it runs well I feel like it could run better. Every other game I throw at my rig isn't nearly as demanding as Crysis. The common complaint amongst most people is that after spending > $3000 on a computer, it should be able to play everything out max everything.

At least get fraps for now and find out your actual FPS in all situations, rather than just guessing.
 

Oh Snap

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2008
414
0
18,780

My heatsink is a thermalright ultra-120 extreme, and the fan is just a dynex 120mm. It maintains <50c at full load, but I still need to lap the heatsink as it's still not keeping the cpu as cool as I'd like it.
 

y2kgtp

Distinguished
Jun 3, 2008
189
1
18,690
Would this run a bit smoother on DX9 in XP? I picked up this game just due to all the hype as I just got a 8800GT card as well on a E8400 chip.

I was thinking of slapping XP Pro in a dual boot configuration just to play around with it.
 

Oh Snap

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2008
414
0
18,780
There's a definite increase in performance when playing Crysis in XP vs. Vista (regardless of whether or not you're playing in DX9 or DX10 on Vista).
 

raptorxt

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2007
144
0
18,680
what a load of ****
you cannot run crysis at 1600x1200 with all very high settings with 2aa on at 30fps and up

BULL ****

i have a 9800gtx
and i cant even run it with those settings with 30fps
i can run 1920x1200 with a mix of high and very high with NO NO NO NO AA on and can get 28..............but i only get 26 with the settings you are talking about

i dislike when people tell me that i dont get the FPS that i do get at my settings........but in your case ****

theres no way in hell you are getting 30fps and up on that card
 

mothhive

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2007
154
0
18,680


I think he's a little confused. He's only running high and DX9 as he's using XP, not Vista. In that case, his FPS are quite acheivable as I get around 45+ with those settings.
 

Oh Snap

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2008
414
0
18,780

In windows XP an 8800GT could play crysis @ 1600x1200 all high and probably get ~20-30fps. Honestly, XP and dx9 crysis really isn't that demanding.
 

y2kgtp

Distinguished
Jun 3, 2008
189
1
18,690
Can't you just turn down some of the settings in Vista to kinda match a DX9 type of graphics (and performance)? I'm torn on to install Vista, or XP on my latest computer now....
 

mothhive

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2007
154
0
18,680
You can run actual DX9 graphics in Crysis, even if you're using Vista. DX10 is an optional setting. You will get much better performance in DX9, you just won't get some of the effects.
 

raptorxt

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2007
144
0
18,680
i'm sorry did anybody read the first post

he said he was also using 2xAA with those results

i agree that you can achieve those frames WITHOUT 2xAA on, but with it on you cant

i have a 9800gtx and i can get 25fps with 2xAA on with the same settings he has NOT **** 30

MAZIAR has the right numbers
with 2xAA on it destroys his FPS
i completely agree with his post

i play Crysis at 1920x1200 with a mix of high and very high with NO AA and achieve an average of 28FPS

either HYDER is full of **** or he has a 4000% overclock
 

mothhive

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2007
154
0
18,680
I don't know raptor, I just did a bench of Crysis at 1680 x 1050, 2xAA, DX9, everything set to high and my average FPS were 34.62 with a high of 41.48 and a low of 26.86 and I'm running it on Vista. So if XP is a little faster and if his card is OC'd, I can't see why it wouldn't be possible.
 

trackman2010

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
88
0
18,630
raptorxt, OP is just guessing his framerates here, so I don't think he's claiming them as a fact.
I agree they can't be like that with 2xAA... hell, it doesn't run that well even with no AA at all on that card.

My 8800GT runs Crysis all high @1680*1050 and no AA, and what I get is 22-30 fps average. In the later stages of the game, framerate tends to drop below 22 quite a bit. With 2x AA applied, it's considerably less, averaging in the high teens.

mothhive, the Crysis benchmarks are off.
I get higher numbers in the benchmarks, but a real playthrough gives lower fps at the same settings.
Play the game and monitor the fps with FRAPS, and you'll see for yourself.

PS. Using XP here.
 

y2kgtp

Distinguished
Jun 3, 2008
189
1
18,690


What are you using to benchmark Crysis with? Just curious.....
 

raptorxt

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2007
144
0
18,680
well, i must have stepped into an alternate universe where the 8800gt destroys the 9800gtx in all aspects

i cant even **** get 30fps at those settings

wait........i have an idea.........set the nvidia control panel antialiasing to 2x and override any application........because i use to have a problem on my 7950gt where when i turned AA on in game it would change back to NO aa
 

trackman2010

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
88
0
18,630
Are you even reading the posts?
The only two people that claimed these FPS were achievable with 2xAA were mothhive, who has a 9800GTX just like you and was using the Crysis benchmarking utility, which as I mentioned is off, and the OP who was just guesstimating, wrongly I might add.

As has been mentioned, normal FPS for a single stock 8800GT running Crysis at high settings with NO AA @ 1600*1200 are exactly like Oh Snap mentioned; 20-30 FPS depending on the situation and location in the game.

With 2xAA on, it's simply not playable and averages in the teens as I mentioned before.
 

mothhive

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2007
154
0
18,680


Crysis benchmarking tool

I have since downloaded Fraps and I get pretty much the same results in game as in the benchmark (bigger lows and slightly bigger highs in the benchmark though), but yes, I am using a 9800gtx. I thought the fact that I was running it with Vista (which I'm led to believe is a total resource hog and reduces performance considerably) and was getting at least 5fps over the 30 he mentioned would kinda even everything out and mean that an 8800GT could manage it if OC'd. I guess I was being a bit optimistic and I would obviously advise everyone to listen to trackman2010 as he actually has the 8800GT and XP.

Anyway, Hyder seems to be happy with the way it performs, so lets not bicker and argue over whose FPS beat whose. This is supposed to be a happy occasion! :D
 

raptorxt

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2007
144
0
18,680
TRACKMAN
so, what you are saying is that you agree that the thread starter (Hyder) is mistaken in his claim that he gets OVER 30fps at the mentioned settings

and yes i have read the **** thread over and over just to see if i hadnt missed "oh yeah i guess i didnt have 2xaa on"...............

i agree with you completely......and dont **** question whether or not i have read the damn thread.......when i was only talking to the OP the entire time and his ridiculous "guesstimates" as you call them