Ok... is it just me or do other people HATE this type of review? Let me explain what I mean....
1st) 1-2% does not make a board "the fastest" From my experience, this margin of difference is simply to small to be credited ANYTHING other than "equal". If your boss came up to you and told you, you get a 1% raise this year would this excite you?
2nd) After your 1% raise, if you bought a $300 board to get that 1% you'd be a fool! That said, if for features / brand you choose a board, that's very reasonable. But please, please, Tom's stop this "winner" stuff when the margins are so slim. You take your $300 board + CPU, I'll buy a $135 board + BETTER CPU, who's faster? In this light, performance is relative to price!!!
3rd) I grow oh so tired of .. Intel Quad Extreme + Asus Super Duper MB + Ultra Performance Corsair + 1200Watt PSU + 8800Ultra + Raptor raid 0 just look at this performance type of reviews!! You know what, you just dropped 3k, that system better be insane! It's much easier to pick the most expensive hardware on the market and see performance... I really want to know more about value.
I hate seeing a $300 board called a "performance winner" when a $135 board comes within a few percent. I wonder what happens when you buy a $135 board and slap in the next step CPU or Memory or GPU, oh yeah.. it will CRUSH the same price system with a $300 board.
Ahh well... I guess this is my torch to carry. I've had this same rant before, perhaps one day will hear it and listen.
Peter