Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Overclocking: Tom's Sets World Record

Overclocking: Tom's Sets World Record
By

On Saturday February 23, members of the Jmax-Hardware, Tom’s Hardware, and Tom’s Guide forums met in the offices of Bestofmedia. They had come to try to set a new world record for overclocking. And they succeeded.

The team consisted of 13 members: six from Jmax-Hardware, four from the Tom’s Hardware forums, and three members of the Tom’s Guide forums. The hardware used to set the record consisted of four test platforms; three using a liquid-nitrogen cooling system and one with a compressor-based (DoD or Direct-on-Die) cooling system.

We memorialized the day in a series of photos you’ll find on the following pages.

View the video taken at Bestofmedia’s offices here.

See more See less
Display all 92 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    chechnyan , July 28, 2008 8:45 AM
    ohh my god how he could do that in the picture 11
    its insane
  • 0 Hide
    Acethechosenone , July 28, 2008 8:49 AM
    Congrats Tom, a 5Ghz Q6600! Next step : Sponsorship from McDonald's ;) 
  • 1 Hide
    JohnnyMash , July 28, 2008 9:21 AM
    Nice job of hitting 5+GHz! While it is usually customary to go into huge amounts of detail when reporting a LN2 'dyno run', there is very little information and a couple too many shots of beaming tech-heads and them eating at Macca's, and general uninformative detail in system photos. Given that this is a 'world record', it was quite unspectacular.

    Give the camera to that balding dude next time!
  • 0 Hide
    outlw6669 , July 28, 2008 9:30 AM
    WTG Toms!
    That is a hell of an overclock!
  • 1 Hide
    caskachan , July 28, 2008 9:42 AM
    ok so how many more pages do i have to skim trough to know the actual record?
  • 0 Hide
    fallen2004 , July 28, 2008 9:43 AM
    wow dats impressive, kinda a waste of time n money bt stil its fun
    Bt y use a P35 board wouldnt an X48 have been beter?
  • 0 Hide
    lucuis , July 28, 2008 9:53 AM
    Damn that's impressive. I wish it had any real world application though.
  • 0 Hide
    3Ball , July 28, 2008 11:04 AM
    Very impressive guys. Grats!

    Best,

    3Ball
  • 0 Hide
    randomizer , July 28, 2008 11:06 AM
    So what was the record, highest Q6600 clockspeed?
  • 0 Hide
    jaragon13 , July 28, 2008 11:38 AM
    holy ****.
  • 0 Hide
    cmashwin , July 28, 2008 11:38 AM
    Why is the CPU-Z showing only 2 cores and 2 threads?? Were the other 2 cores disabled?? If so, its not REALLY valid right?"
  • 0 Hide
    Noya , July 28, 2008 11:45 AM
    Of course it's a non-USA Tom's...
  • 0 Hide
    truehighroller , July 28, 2008 12:10 PM
    I hope this isn't a double post first off. They were all kids?? I should have been invited. I could have beat that score. I would love to become a hardware tester for companies.
  • 0 Hide
    martel80 , July 28, 2008 12:22 PM
    I would think that E7200 would beat Q6600 in overclock (if just GHz matters).
  • 0 Hide
    cah027 , July 28, 2008 12:35 PM
    Wonder how fast you could shrink a 2 hour dvd with that !
  • 1 Hide
    caamsa , July 28, 2008 1:25 PM
    All that and no benchmarks............sigh...............
  • 0 Hide
    Shadow703793 , July 28, 2008 2:30 PM
    Quote:
    While the overclocking is done mostly under Windows, a properly adjusted BIOS is an advantage.

    :lol:  You should NEVER OC through Windows.

    A full spec set (ie. RAM,etc) would also have been useful. One fact to note was that the motherboard was based on the P35 chipset.
  • 0 Hide
    LsRamAir , July 28, 2008 2:46 PM
    Ummm, that isnt a Q6600 anymore once you deactivate half the cores. Its just a core 2 duo now, the real World Record needs to have cores 2 and 3 functioning... since they are less stable.
  • 0 Hide
    martin0642 , July 28, 2008 2:54 PM
    Well, since they were there and setup already it would have been nice if they tested a processor that was actually nice, like a 45nm dual-core part. Less complexity, an extreme edition that was bin sorted, and smaller fab might have resulted in a higher clock. Not that going from 2.4 to 5.1 on a quad isn't impressive in and of itself, it is, but since everyone was already dressed up you might as well do the full party.
  • 0 Hide
    physx7 , July 28, 2008 3:03 PM
    Wow... Will be interesting to know what kind of benchies that will get.

    Good article
Display more comments