Intel's open-sourced Mobin 2.1 operating system could give Microsoft some trouble in the desktop and mobile markets.
CNET is claiming that Intel's new open-source Moblin 2.1 (short for Mobile Linux) operating system could take on Google's Android and even Microsoft Windows in the mobile and desktop markets. CNET got a good taste of Moblin 2.1 this week at the Intel Developer Forum, saying that the OS will focus on a variety of devices including in-car systems, smartphones, Mobile Internet Devices, and even nettops.
When the OS finally hits the market, Moblin 2.1 will arrive in three flavors: one for nettops, one for Netbooks, and one for handhelds. CNET said that the smartphone version will run on Atom chip-based devices, capable of touch-screen and gesture input. Users will be able to move through different applications running in the background; the OS will also provide shortcuts to social-networking applications.
As for the Netbook aspect, CNET kept it short, saying that Dell recently began selling its $299 Mini 10v Notebook with an option for Ubuntu Moblin Remix, with other PC makers lined up to manufacture Moblin-based netbooks as well. The nettop news was even shorter, saying that with Windows XP on the way out, Microsoft will need to spit out a version of Windows 7 that will be cheap enough for the Netbook and nettop market. Intel is quietly watching with Moblin 2.1 cocked and ready for an assault.
But, as CNET points out, overall the success of Intel's Moblin 2.1 will depend on third-party software availability. The company has launched its Atom Developer Program to draw in developers for the new platform. "Moblin puts Intel in competition with Microsoft on several fronts, opposing Windows Mobile on smartphones and Windows desktop on Netbooks and nettops," CNET's Lance Whitney said. "But the two still need to play together."

nice
And by the way, this is the second Kevin Parrish article with a typo in the title in a short time. Maybe he's omitting letters on purpose to give us a message or something? :0
It's code!
Nope - he is just made of fail.
it's UL so far... hmmmmm
21-12 if you use the numbers...
They had this thing called "IDF"
Or, long, Intel Developers Forum.
No only I agree with that but I think Intel is smart enough to not go that way even as a joke.. I really see no reason why not in everything else than the desktop part. When it comes to desktop I dont think they consider doing anything, plus the fact that no gamer, no O/Cer and no casual user etc will change OS... We all know ow hard will be for many to move from XP to Windows 7 which is great. And you are telling me ppl will change to Mobin? I dont think they are meant to be desktop Os eitherway and I dont know why its stated on the article.
/sarcasm
The ONLY, I repeat, ONLY way that Intel can pull it off is if they strong-arm the OEMs into including it instead of Windows, which won't hurt my feelings, as long as Moblin stays 100% open-source. I have to wonder what their motive is for doing this, though...
System Requirements:
* CPU: Intel(r) Atom(tm) or Intel(r) Core(tm) 2 CPU (support for SSSE3)
Note: Moblin will not work on non-SSSE3 CPUs
OH NO!!! intel's turning into apple
Microsoft says it has, and of course, doesn't show them.
Tries to lure companies into all kinds of contracts.
Because the Linux Developers work around them very fast.
Currently, Microsofts IP threat to Linux is going downhill!
Search for FAT patents.
There is now OIN which tres to collect patents to PROTECT Linux:
http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/09/09/237622/oin-secures-ex-microsoft-linux-patents.htm
Go OIN, GO!!
And intel and AMD both support x86 and x64 instruction set.
Most programs are written for that. And over time, hopefully the patents will expire and so the IP monopoly.
The AMD64 core provides leading-edge performance for both 32-bit and 64-bit applications
* AMD64 technology provides full-speed support for x86 code base without compromising performance
* 40-bit physical addresses, 48-bit virtual addresses
* Sixteen 64-bit integer registers
* Sixteen 128-bit SSE/SSE2/SSE3 registers
* AMD Digital Media XPress™ provides support for SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and MMX instructions
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/athlon/Pages/amd-athlon-processors-key-architectural-features.aspx
"SSSE3 (with 3 's')"
SSSE3 was introduced with Core 2
SSE3 was introduced with Pentium IV, and is also supported on AMD CPUs
Most people don't realize that SSSE3 accounted for the lion's share of Core2's advantage over AMD, hence Intel made it the first non-open SSE revision. SSSE3 allowed execution of 2 64 bit SSE3 instructions simultaneously.