QuakeCon: Where is Doom 4?

Next news
3:51 PM - August 14, 2009 by Kevin Parrish

Back on May 7, id Software announced that it had begun production on Doom 4, and that the company expanded its internal team of developers to work on the new project. Id Software also began accepting applications for job openings stemming from the project, looking for a lead animator, lead designer, a producer, and more. While no other details were provided, id Software said that Doom 4 was slated for the PC, Xbox 360, and PlayStation 3.

Naturally, fans waited patiently for new information, and looked to QuakeCon--currently underway in Grapevine, Texas--as a source of juicy news. However, id Software's CEO Todd Hollenshead quickly rained on everyone's parade by avoiding the project altogether, promising that more details is to come...next year. "When we show it to you, you're going to love it," he told the crowd.

According to Shacknews, John Carmack wasn't quite so standoffish, revealing that the project represents "the most tightly managed approach" the company has ever used. He said that thanks to the work dumped into the id Tech 5 engine and Rage, the tools and technology for Doom 4 already exists (unlike Doom 3 which was developed along with the id Tech 4 engine).

Honestly, Doom 4 news was highly unlikely at QuakeCon given that the game just entered development. Still, Doom fans are surely clamoring for something Doom 4 just didn't provide: a fast and exciting shooter yanked straight out of hell.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
VioMeTriX 08/14/2009 10:25 PM
Hide
-8+

patiently awaiting doom 4 news.... still excited about it anyways

Anonymous 08/14/2009 10:27 PM
Hide
-7+

2nd to last line probably should reference Doom 3.
3rd paragraph has typo as well :
"the most tightly managed approach" ?to? company has ever used.

Burodsx 08/14/2009 10:38 PM
Hide
-0+

A couple of pictures of monsters or weapons would have been nice -- just enough to tease us.

Anonymous 08/14/2009 11:03 PM
Hide
-0+

Don't worry. Apparently, more details is to come . . .

megamanx00 08/15/2009 1:45 AM
Hide
-2+

Rage isn't even out yet so I think it's too early to show anything from Doom 4. I'm sure ID will show something when they actually have something they feel is worth showing. I'm sure it will come out soon enough. After all, ID knows it' can't spend 12 years developing a game unlike some other developers :D.

mickey21 08/15/2009 2:26 AM
Hide
-0+

Way too early to expect something. I know I wasnt. It would have been nice to have something for release though.

gto127 08/15/2009 3:15 AM
Hide
-7+

I hope they keep doom 4 old school. Have the same monsters as the first 2 & have them look about the same except super deatiled. No team based missions in the main game but mabye on online optional missions. No super hard puzzels but find the keys without taking all day & hordes of monsters to kill off.

cletus_slackjawd 08/15/2009 5:06 AM
Hide
-2+

Doom I was so revolutionary: the most realistic and suspenseful game I had ever played to that point and I was seriously hooked. I remember breaking a sweat for how the game really pulled you into the action. Doom 2 was truly a worthy successor, adding so much without changing the fundamentals. Doom 3 looked great, but it could never live up to the hype and glory of yore. Some parts shined but it more out of nostalgia that I played it and not for the pure lure of the gameplay or anything.
I hope Doom 4 will somehow be ground breaking or simply tried and true. They would do well even now to re-release Doom 2 gameplay with updated graphics and sound. If not, then at least make physicals and completely destructable enviroment like the havok engine in RedFaction I

downer88 08/15/2009 7:05 AM
Hide
-1+

I hope you're not seriously asking where Doom 4 is in as many months as it will take years to develop.

mrubermonkey 08/15/2009 7:11 AM
Hide
-1+

Doom 4 will be based off of DirectX 9.0c when DirectX 11 will already be out according to what John Carmack has stated in past interviews. Doom 3 was about the graphics and was the Crysis of its day if anyone can remember those days anymore. This made sense since the Doom story is basically very simple and one would have trouble put a new spin on such a straightforward first person shooter. Since the same will probably apply to this fourth iteration, if not more so since this has been done three times before, graphics are going to be the greatest hope of success for this title. Here is the conundrum since much of what can be done easily or exclusively with DirectX 11 may be difficult or impossible to accomplish with DirectX 9.0c, what Doom 4 will be using, from the perspective of graphics. Maybe John Carmack was just kidding about it using DirectX 9.0c when it comes out, but if not then this game may turn out to be less then what it is hyped up to be. Hopefully it will at least incorporate triple buffering. Enough said.

hannibal 08/15/2009 12:13 PM
Hide
-0+

Ofcourse it will be DX9. Most GPU's in the world are still DX9 based. Expect DX11 games in 2-3 years from now. (If they are quick, most propably it will take longer. It all depends on how fast Vista / Win7 take of...

Regulas 08/15/2009 1:29 PM
Hide
-0+

Doom 4 will be Open GL.

caskachan 08/15/2009 1:37 PM
Hide
-0+

dude one game at a time, XD

they showed rage, maybe after relase, they start working on doom4

marraco 08/15/2009 5:58 PM
Hide
-2+

Doom 3 surprised me, by being the only game I ever played, capable of raise my nerves, when played at dark room with headphones.

His atmosphere is dark, and is real art. Dark art, but the only at that level. I suffered it, but anyway played it many times.

I had heard comments about that kind of art on other games as FEAR xx, but they are totally inferior, washed down. Fear had good "hollywood" quality, but is not art.

I expect a lot from Doom 4. I fear too much...

dante01010 08/17/2009 1:41 AM
Show
doomsdaydave11 08/17/2009 4:23 AM
Hide
-0+

Doom

coolvoodoo 08/17/2009 5:24 AM
Hide
-0+

I've enjoyed all the Dooms over the years, and none have ever disappointed. Doom 3 did make me jump a few times..........lol

mr_tuel 08/17/2009 6:17 AM
Hide
-0+

wow, quakecon is (was) being held at the Gaylord Texan!

stradric 08/17/2009 2:17 PM
Hide
-1+

Maybe this time their space marines of the future will actually have flashlights built into their guns and uniforms. Doom 3 sucked (great tech, awful game). I have low expectations for Doom 4. So I guess that's a good thing.

thearm 08/17/2009 2:39 PM
Hide
-0+

Who cares. The previous Doom was tarded.

smlong 08/17/2009 2:57 PM
Hide
-1+

I thought Doom3 was a stinker too. It was so forgettable, I can barely even remember playing it.

cynewulf 08/17/2009 4:01 PM
Hide
-1+

marraco :
Doom 3 surprised me, by being the only game I ever played, capable of raise my nerves, when played at dark room with headphones.


I take it you've never played System Shock 2 then.

Doom 3's 'atmosphere' was little more than cheap slasher film type scare tactics. Sorry but monsters jumping out of cupboards (futuristic cupboards, but cupboards nonetheless) do not make for a tense atmosphere.

Seriously. If you think Doom 3 is scary then SS2 will make you c**p your pants.

Kithzaru 08/17/2009 5:33 PM
Hide
-0+

I would imagine that they would want to release Rage, then wait to release Doom 4 when Rage starts to die off... it's just good business practice.

Doom 3

RADIO_ACTIVE 08/17/2009 8:17 PM
Hide
-0+

cynewulf :
I take it you've never played System Shock 2 then.Doom 3's 'atmosphere' was little more than cheap slasher film type scare tactics. Sorry but monsters jumping out of cupboards (futuristic cupboards, but cupboards nonetheless) do not make for a tense atmosphere.Seriously. If you think Doom 3 is scary then SS2 will make you c**p your pants.



The original FEAR is great to :)

Netherscourge 08/18/2009 4:43 PM
Hide
-1+

Doom 3 was pretty boring IMO.

It should have been more action-packed. Instead, it was walking down seemingly empty hallways until a fat zombie popped out of a metal grate in the wall.

Rinse and repeat 100 times and that's Doom 3.

Fancy graphics - shallow gameplay.

/yawn

Sponsored links

Related articles

  • PC Gamers Have Good Titles To Select From This Holiday Season

    PC gamers have numerous good titles to enjoy this holiday season. The titles that top our list this year are "Call of Duty," "XIII," "Max Payne 2," "Halo For PC," "Rise Of Nations," "Deus Ex: Invisible War," "Star Wars: Knights Of The Old Republic," and "Madden 2004." "Call of Duty" was previewed by THG game reviewer, Weston Patch, at Quakecon 2003, where we told us that it was a title to keep our eyes on. The end result of this title is stellar, and it is perhaps one of the most interesting World War II games of 2003. While the graphics in this game are top notch, it offers a much broader range of system requirements range than many of the other games that we have seen this year. Still, it should not disappoint gamers and has become a huge hit with gamers who like this game genre. You can read our full review of the game here . "Rise of Nations" is an excellent real time strategy ("RTS") game that delivered a huge wallop at its release and continues to remain a strong favorite. "Rise Of Nations" was selected as one of our Editors' Choice titles this year, and continues to be a game with long play value. You can read more about this game in our review of it here . If you seek a game that offers pixel shaders that can push your new graphics card to the limit, we suggest "Deus Ex: Invisible War." This game has incredible dynamic lighting and bump mapping effects that will give your DX9 graphics card a good workout. "Knights Of The Old Republic" pushes the Star Wars saga to new heights with some great vertex shader effects and pixel shader work on the light saber, which provide this game with a unique look. "Madden 2004" is still the best of the best, as far as sports games go for the PC. The reflections in the visors and the blades of grass that are visible on the playing field showcase the programmable shader power within this excellent sports title. A Screen shot from Halo for PC. While the reviews of "Halo for PC" were quite mixed due to the hefty system requirements of the game, "Halo for the PC" is one of our favorite games this year. The incredible bump mapped effects, as well as the dynamic lighting, make this game look significantly better than its originally released Xbox version. However, we only recommend this game for those with PCs that exceed the system requirements recommendations by a large margin in order for the game to deliver its best performance. Still, if you have a system that can run this game at its recommended highest levels, you will encounter a game that offers multi-player mode (this was not available in the original Xbox release), plus several new weapons and additional levels not found in the original Xbox release. We still stand by our claim that "Halo for PC" is an Editors' Choice title, and is a game that you should own if you have a system that is capable of running it well. You can read our complete review of "Halo for PC"

  • Test Setup

    It is amazing to think that a game that once was hard for graphics cards is now only limited by the rest of the system. This is not uncommon for many games now, especially in a multi-GPU setup. At Quakecon 2004, a year and a half ago the world cried out in agony as their graphics cards came to a crawl under this Open GL application. Current cards just snicker at the workload and push out the frame rates. Half-Life 2 was a good overall system game until cards stated chewing through the code. We switched to Half-Life 2: Lost Coast to get content that was more demanding like HDR. This title too has fallen by the wayside for the high-end cards. All three of these games are good for comparing the midrange and below but we need more games to cripple these new cards. Only time will tell what GDC and E3 hold in store for us. System Hardware Processor(s) AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 2.8 GHz, 1.0 GHz Bus, 1 MB L2 cache Platform Asus AN8-SLI Premium NVIDIA nForce4 SLI, BIOS 1003 - BIOS version 1005 ATI Xpress 200 CrossFire Edition - Reference ATI Xpress 200, BIOS version 02.58 RAM Corsair CMX1024-4400Pro 2x 1024 MB @ DDR400 (CL3.0-4-4-8) Hard Drive Western Digital Raptor, WD740GD 74 GB, 10,000 rpm, 8 MB cache, SATA150 Networking On-Board nForce4 Gigabit Ethernet Graphics Cards NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX 512 MB GDDR3 650 MHz Core 800 MHz Memory NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT 512 MB GDDR3 600 MHz Core 800 MHz Memory NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB GDDR3 550 MHz Core 1.7 GHz Memory ATI Radeon X1900XTX 512 MB GDDR3 650 MHz Core 1.55 GHz Memory ATI Radeon X1900XT CrossFire Edition 512 MB GDDR3 625 MHz Core 1.45 GHz Memory ATI Radeon X1800GTO 256 MB GDDR3 625 MHz Core 1.50 GHz Memory Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Turbo-Cool 1,000W System Software & Drivers OS Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.10.2600, Service Pack 2 DirectX Version 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) Platform Driver Asus - nForce 6.65 ATI X200 Reference Graphics Driver(s) ATI - Catalyst 6.2 WHQL NVIDIA - Forceware 84. Non-WHQL

  • The DDR2 Joker Upgrades GeForce 6600

    The scene begins with NVIDIA personnel walking out onto a dark stage at North America's largest LAN gaming event, Quakecon, in the year 2004. The lights go up and the screen shines with an image of the first PCIe-only video card, the 6600 GT. Accompanying their flagship for the midrange graphics cards is the 6600. It is hard to believe that over a year has passed since the world moved from AGP to PCIe, not to mention how it wasn't long ago that we all felt that 3 vertex shaders and 8 pixel shaders was to die for. The $149-$179 price range was close to the heart of gamers, as they could begin to adopt PCIe for their gaming systems. NVIDIA has taken that same core and performed a bit of cosmetic surgery to produce an even faster version of their beloved 6600. The core upgrade was complimented with an upgrade of its own. While the original 6600 was equipped with GDDR1 on a 128 bit bus, NVIDIA has now paired the core with cheaper, yet faster, DDR2. The new model from XFX is the PV-T43P-UDS7. The lengthy product name describes that it is using NVIDIA's new design with the brand name of GeForce 6600, with DDR2 memory.

Ads

Best offers

Dell Small Business Windows 7 Professional (Full Product) $299.99 Dell Small Business More info
Newegg.com Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... $119.95 Newegg.com More info
Dell Small Business Windows 7 Home Premium (Upgrade) $119.99 Dell Small Business More info
Dell Small Business Windows 7 Ultimate (Full Product) $319.99 Dell Small Business More info
Dell Small Business Norton Internet Security 2010 - 3 Users $69.99 Dell Small Business More info
Ads
All about Software
 Latest Software articles
Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools

Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools
Windows 7 is more stable and responsive than Vista, but no operating system is perfect (the same goes for the drivers and apps running on it). We show you a suite of tools built into Microsoft’s shiny new OS to help you troubleshoot your Windows 7 issues. Read More

  • Windows 7 And Windows Vista: Performance Compared
    Microsoft is hyping Windows 7 as the operating system that everyone should adopt. We'd already done a bit of benchmarking in the new OS, but we revisit a longer list of tests today, including more real-world tasks, like boot-up, hibernate, and shutdown. Read More
All Software articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post
Popular Searches

Partners

Ads

Sponsored links