The best graphics card sits at the heart of any gaming PC, but quantifying what is 'best' can be tricky. There's no single solution that's right for everyone: Some want the fastest graphics card, others the best value, and many are looking for the best card at a given price. Balancing performance, price, features, and efficiency is important because no other component impacts your gaming experience as much as the graphics card.
We test and review all the major GPUs, and we've ranked every graphics card in our GPU hierarchy based on performance. We've also done extensive testing of graphics card power consumption, using proper hardware, and we've looked at the broader AMD vs Nvidia GPUs breakdown. For those not running a top-end Intel CPU, we've also tested the top ten current GPUs on AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X and compared performance with the same GPUs running on Core i9-9900K. Here we cut things down to a succinct list of the best graphics cards you can currently buy.
We've provided 10 options for the best graphics cards, recognizing that there's plenty of overlap. Is the RX 5700 XT better than the RTX 2060 Super? We think so, though it's less of a decisive win when looking at RX 5600 XT vs RTX 2060. Individual preference definitely plays a role, and we've included many options on this list catering to all budgets.
Looking forward, Nvidia revealed its Ampere GA100 GPU on May 14, but it's clearly a data center part. What does that mean for the rest of the Ampere lineup? Here's everything we know about the RTX 3080 and Ampere, along with AMD's Big Navi and Intel's Xe Graphics. There's a lot going on in 2020 with upcoming GPUs, so unless you absolutely have to buy a new GPU right now, waiting for the next GPU architectures to come out is a good plan. That's particularly true of the high-end offerings, as it's a terrible time to spend a lot of money on a GPU when faster solutions are right around the corner.
It's not just upcoming GPUs, however. Prices are on the rise, likely related to COVID-19 shortages. Paying more today for hardware that's soon to be outdated is a double whammy. Our current recommendations reflect the changing GPU market, factoring all of the above. The GPUs are ordered mostly by performance, but price, features, and efficiency are still factors so in a few cases a slightly slower card may be ranked higher.
Quick Shopping Tips
When buying a graphics card, consider the following:
• Resolution: The more pixels you're pushing, the more performance you need. You don't need a top-of-the-line GPU to game at 1080p.
• PSU: Make sure that your power supply has enough juice and the right 6- and/or 8-pin connector(s). For example, Nvidia recommends a 650-watt PSU for the RTX 2070 Super, and you'll need two 8-pin and/or 6-pin PEG connectors.
• Video Memory: A 4GB card is the minimum right now, 6GB models are better, and 8GB or more is strongly recommended.
• FreeSync or G-Sync? Either variable refresh rate technology will synchronize your GPU's frame rate with your screen's refresh rate. If your monitor supports G-Sync tech (for recommendations, see our Best Gaming Monitors list), you'll need a GeForce GPU. AMD's FreeSync tech works with Radeon cards, and Nvidia has certified some FreeSync displays as being G-Sync Compatible.
| GPU | Performance Rank | Value Rank (fps/$) |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 2080 Ti | 1 (117 fps) | 10 ($1,140) |
| RTX 2080 Super | 2 (102 fps) | 9 ($700) |
| RTX 2070 Super | 3 (91 fps) | 8 ($500) |
| RX 5700 XT | 4 (87 fps) | 4 ($360) |
| RX 5700 | 5 (78 fps) | 6 ($350) |
| RTX 2060 Super | 6 (77 fps) | 7 ($370) |
| RX 5600 XT | 7 (71 fps) | 2 ($260) |
| RTX 2060 | 8 (68 fps) | 5 ($295) |
| GTX 1660 Super | 9 (58 fps) | 3 ($230) |
| GTX 1650 Super | 10 (43 fps) | 1 ($160) |
Best Graphics Cards for Gaming 2020
If you're looking for the no-holds-barred champion of graphics cards, right now it's the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. If you're serious about maxing out all the graphics settings and you want to play at 4K or 1440p, this is the card to get — it's mostly overkill for 1080p gaming, though enabling all ray tracing effects in games that support the feature makes 1080p still reasonable. Just look at Minecraft RTX performance to see how increased levels of ray tracing can bring even the 2080 Ti to its knees.
Nvidia's Turing architecture is at the heart of the RTX 2080 Ti, boosting performance even if you don't enable ray tracing or DLSS. Concurrent floating-point and integer execution means that even with only moderately higher theoretical performance compared to the previous generation Pascal (GTX 10-series) GPUs like the GTX 1080 Ti, in practice the 2080 Ti is 35-40 percent faster at higher resolutions and settings.
There are three main reasons to not buy the 2080 Ti. First is of course the price — with cards starting at well over $1,000, just the graphics card costs more than an entire mid-range gaming PC. On the opposite end of the spectrum, if money is really no object, there's still the Titan RTX: Double the price for a meager 3-5% increase in performance! Yeah, no thanks. Perhaps most importantly, the RTX 2080 Ti is nearing its two year mark. If you didn't buy one in 2019 or 2018, buying now doesn't make much sense, what with Nvidia's Ampere expected to launch later this year.
Read: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Review
If your bank account is thinking about going on strike for eyeing the 2080 Ti, stepping down to the RTX 2080 Super might help. You're still getting the second fastest graphics card, saving about 35% on the price, and getting 85-90% of the performance. What's more, 1440p and 4K gaming are totally possible on the RTX 2080 Super, just not necessarily at maximum quality (especially 4K). The good news is that the difference between ultra and high quality in many games is difficult to see, while the jump in performance can be significant.
There's still the question of what will happen with ray tracing adoption in the future, of course. The first round of DirectX Raytracing (DXR) games has often seen performance drop by 30-40% when the feature is enabled. DLSS can often make up for that drop, but the implementations of both DXR and DLSS vary by game. If you take a game like Control, which features ray traced reflections, contact shadows and diffuse lighting — the most complete implementation of ray tracing in a game to date (not counting Quake II RTX and Minecraft RTX, which are special cases of porting an old/simple game to full path tracing) — performance dropped by half, and DLSS 2.0 only mostly recovers the lost fps.
When games in the future start using more ray tracing effects, even the 2080 Super may not keep up. That doesn't mean you should ignore ray tracing hardware, however. Buying an RTX 2080 Super gets you a graphics card that will handle any current game, and out of the games we tested (see below), it stayed above 60 fps at 1440p ultra in every case. Just be careful about potential buyer's remorse once Ampere shows up. Current rumors suggest the RTX 3080 will be 30-50% faster than the RTX 2080 Super, though at what price remains cloaked in mystery.
Read: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super Review
Not counting Nvidia's Titan cards, AMD's RX 5700 XT sits in seventh place in our overall GPU hierarchy of performance, but it has other benefits. It's nearly as fast as the RTX 2070 Super, trailing by just 4% overall, and pricing starts at $360 for the least expensive models. We've tested several custom 5700 XT cards, like the ASRock RX 5700 XT Taichi, Gigabyte RX 5700 XT, and Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 XT Pulse. Performance typically falls in a narrow range, with aesthetics, cooler size, and price being the main differences.
AMD doesn't support hardware or software ray tracing, which is certainly a factor, but in traditional rasterization techniques AMD's RDNA architecture is very competitive. AMD's GPUs also tend to do better in games that use either DirectX 12 or the Vulkan API, though DX11 games favor Nvidia. Overall, across our test suite, the 5700 XT beats the RTX 2060 Super by about 7% in performance (as well as the earlier RTX 2070 by 4%), and typically costs $30 less. There have been some concerns with AMD's drivers since Navi launched, but the latest updates appear to have addressed the biggest problems.
Compared to AMD's own previous generation products, the RX 5700 XT also puts up an impressive performance. It basically matches the Radeon VII at 1080p and 1440p, all while using 75W less power. That's partly the benefit of the 7nm FinFET manufacturing process, something Nvidia will utilize in Ampere, but the foundational RDNA architecture definitely improved resource utilization over the previous GCN architecture cards. Our biggest concern is that AMD's RDNA 2 will add ray tracing later this year, and apparently 50% higher performance per watt. That's arguably worth the wait at this point.
Read: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review
The law of diminishing returns is in full effect as you move up to the top of the GPU hierarchy, which means you'll pay more for proportionately less performance every additional step. The best way to avoid that is to drop back a few notches, which is where you'll find the RTX 2070 Super. 4K gaming is perhaps a stretch, unless you drop down to medium/high quality (in the most demanding games), but 1440p ultra is still viable.
Just as the RTX 2080 Super is a sensible step down from the 2080 Ti, the 2070 Super is only about 10% slower than the 2080 Super but costs almost 30% less. It's also only a few percent slower than the earlier vanilla RTX 2080, and you still get 8GB of GDDR6, ray tracing and DLSS, and a card that beats the previous generation GTX 1080 Ti — along with every current AMD GPU. This is all at the same nominal price as the slightly older and slightly slower RTX 2070, and there's no Founders Edition tax this round.
Whether it's the latest shooter at maxed out settings, ray tracing games like Control or Deliver Us the Moon, or getting lost in VR with Valve's Half-Life: Alyx, the RTX 2070 Super should be able to keep you happily gaming for several years. As with the other Nvidia GPUs, however, Ampere is waiting in the wings and it doesn't make sense to spend a lot of money right before new graphics cards come out.
Read: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super Review
Taking a step down from the fastest AMD GPU often gives you a tremendous amount of performance for less money, and the Radeon RX 5700 is no exception. Like the Vega 56 vs. Vega 64, or R9 390 vs. R9 390X, the RX 5700 gives you about 93% of the performance of the RX 5700 XT, for about 80% of the price. Originally a $350 graphics card, we're routinely seeing sales and rebates that drop the RX 5700 to around $300-$310. Given the extra memory and higher performance, it's an easy pick over the newer RX 5600 XT, as well as Nvidia's RTX 2060 Super.
Everything good and bad about the RX 5700 XT also applies here. Efficiency and performance are much better than AMD's previous generation GCN architecture, but you still don't get ray tracing support. We do wonder if AMD will, like Nvidia, enable DXR support in its drivers once Navi 2x launches later this year, or if Navi 1x will forever remain in the rasterization zone. If the next round or ray tracing cards boosts performance in such calculations by 3-4X compared to Nvidia's Turing RTX GPUs, it's probably a moot point.
Prices on the RX 5700 are in flux, so depending on when you look the 5700 XT may be the more sensible choice. For basically the same price as the now-discounted RTX 2060, it remains a good pick. Across our test suite, it ends up 11% faster at 1080p and 1440p compared to Nvidia's GPU. It's also tied (1% ahead of) with the RTX 2060 Super, for $40-$70 less. Plus, let's be honest: Ray tracing performance shouldn't be the top priority of anyone trying to decide between the 2060 and the 5700. Middling performance in ray tracing versus faster performance everywhere else? The RX 5700 is a great option.
Read: AMD Radeon RX 5700 Review
Out of all the Nvidia RTX cards, the RTX 2060 Super is the hardest to recommend. It's not that it's a bad card — it's plenty fast and has the same features as other RTX models — but performance and pricing end up being eclipsed by AMD's 5700 XT, or you can save even more money and still come out barely ahead in performance with the RX 5700. Considering it costs nearly $100 more than the 5700, that's not a great bargain. In a direct face off between the RX 5700 XT and the RTX 2060 Super, we gave AMD the edge, and lowered AMD prices make things even more weighted in favor of the RX 5700 and 5700 XT now. Still, the 2060 Super handles 1080p and 1440p gaming without difficulty; AMD's card just costs less.
The good news is that competition from AMD means better pricing for everyone, whether you go with team red or team green. The RTX 2060 Super is nearly the same performance as the earlier RTX 2070 that we've recommended in the past (it's 4% slower), and it costs $100-$200 less. Thankfully, like the other RTX Super cards, there's no Founders Edition 'tax' this time.
If you want an 8GB card that can do ray tracing, for the lowest price possible, the RTX 2060 Super fills that niche. The extra memory does actually have an impact on ray tracing performance as well, so there are reasons to spring for the upgrade over the vanilla RTX 2060. Just don't be surprised if an RTX 3060 shows up that performs better and costs less later this year or in early 2021.
Read: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super Review
The Radeon RX 5600 XT launch is the perfect showcase for how competitive the mid-range graphics card market has become. Initially intended to compete with the GTX 1660 Ti at the $280 price point, it would have easily won that matchup — it's about 15% faster. Then Nvidia preemptively dropped the price on the RTX 2060 Founders Edition to $299, and worked with EVGA to launch a special RTX 2060 KO for $300 as well, and things got interesting. AMD responded with a last-minute BIOS update that increased clock speeds on the RX 5600 XT, and allowed partners the option to run the memory at 14 Gbps instead of the 'reference' 12 Gbps. Needless to say, a 17% increase in memory bandwidth and GPU clocks helps quite a bit.
Now that the dust has settled, most RX 5600 XT models have 14 Gbps BIOS updates available. Prices have also dropped, and cards like this Gigabyte RX 5600 XT OC-6G start at just $260-$270 (after rebate, and yes it has a 14 Gbps BIOS update). Performance is similar to what you get with a factory overclocked RTX 2060, though Nvidia's slightly lower power use and features like ray tracing and DLSS still give it the edge. But this is a win by judge's decision and not a knockout, never mind EVGA's KO branding, and some people will be happier supporting AMD and saving $30 or more.
Our advice for the RX 5600 XT is to pick up a card with 14 Gbps memory, which is most of them. The 14 Gbps update improves performance by at least 5% compared to 12 Gbps memory, and 10-15% compared to the 'reference' specs listed above.
Read: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT Review
Nvidia's RTX 2060 was a decent card when it launched in January 2019, and dropping the price on the Founders Edition one year later keeps it in the running. In a direct head-to-head between 'reference' RTX 2060 and RX 5600 XT models, Nvidia eked out a win, but lower prices have now pushed our recommendation back to AMD. A lot of it will depend on current pricing, the features you get, as well as potential factory overclocks. Non-reference RX 5600 XT cards beat the stock 2060 FE, but non-reference RTX 2060 cards like the EVGA RTX 2060 KO Ultra swap things back.
For many people, $300 is about as much as they're willing to spend on a graphics card, making this an important part. Sure, the RTX 2080 Ti is almost twice as fast at 4K ultra, but it also costs nearly four times as much. The RTX 2060 is also great for 1080p gaming, averaging 90 fps in our test suite at ultra settings, though Metro Exodus and Red Dead Redemption 2 both fall short of 60 fps at ultra settings.
It's also good to put things in perspective. The RTX 2060 at $300 is nearly 70% faster than the GTX 1060 6GB, and basically twice as fast as the GTX 970. At the same time, today's RTX 2060 cards are functionally the same as last year's RTX 2060 cards. We can think of better things to do than waiting a year to save $50. But if you're in the market for a new graphics card today and you don't want to wait around to see what Ampere and Navi 2x have to offer in the fall, this is a great 1080p gaming solution — and it will even handle ray tracing okay, if you enable DLSS.
Read: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Review
Dipping down closer to $200, we're given the choice between the GeForce GTX 1660 Super for $230, the vanilla GeForce GTX 1660 for around $200, or the RX 5500 XT 8GB starting at around $200. They're all viable candidates, but we've done the testing (see below) and the GTX 1660 Super is 15% faster than the regular 1660, and nearly 20% faster than the RX 5500 XT 8GB. We've looked at the GTX 1660 vs. RX 5500 XT and declared the Nvidia card the winner, but we also think the GTX 1660 Super is better than the GTX 1660 for just $20-$30 more.
Despite Nvidia's Turing GPUs still using TSMC 12nm FinFET, actual power use is basically identical to AMD's Navi 14 chips made using TSMC 7nm FinFET. The fact that Nvidia is faster and draws the same power while using the older manufacturing node says a lot. For $230, the GTX 1660 Super basically gets you the same level of performance as the older GTX 1070 in a more efficient design, and it's 1% slower than the GTX 1660 Ti (which is basically no longer worth considering). It also comes with the enhanced Turing NVENC that makes it a great choice for streaming video.
The main drawback to the GTX 1660 Super is that the RX 5600 XT and RTX 2060 aren't that much more expensive, especially considering the performance increase. Both are around 20% faster, for just $30-$70 more money. When looking at the cost of the rest of a PC, for gaming purposes we prefer putting additional funds into the graphics card.
Read: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super Review
We've long recommended AMD's RX 570 4GB as our budget pick, and while it's still available for $120-$140, we're ready to move on to something better. Nvidia's GTX 1650 Super is about 30% faster than the RX 570, but that's only a small part of the upgrades. It also uses substantially less power, plus it includes Nvidia's latest Turing NVENC hardware to help with video encoding and decoding. You don't actually need a ton of CPU power to livestream your gameplay, as the 1650 Super is more than capable of doing the dirty work all on its own.
Even if price is your driving concern, saving $40 to end up with an older and less efficient architecture doesn't really make sense. Polaris first launched in 2016, and while the 1650 Super won't necessarily pay for itself in power savings (it would take a couple of years to break even on power cost at eight hours per day of gaming), more performance, better efficiency, and better video support make this an easy recommendation.
If you want to stick with AMD hardware, the RX 5500 XT 4GB offers nearly identical performance, though it still uses up to 25% more power, and we'd suggest the 8GB model that costs $20-$40 more ... which then leads back to the 1660 Super above. You can also look at the vanilla GTX 1650 (or the GTX 1650 GDDR6) to save $10-$20, but the TU117 GPU in those cards uses the less capable Volta/Pascal NVENC hardware.
If you just need any old GPU, there are less costly options like the GT 1030 and RX 550, but those have even less performance. They're not really good for anything beyond very light gaming, though the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti are the fastest GPUs right now where you don't need a 6-pin PCIe power connector.
Read: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super
How We Test Graphics Cards
Determining pure graphics card performance is best done by eliminating all other bottlenecks — as much as possible, at least. Our current graphics card testbed consists of a Core i9-9900K CPU, MSI MEG Z390 Ace motherboard, 32GB Corsair DDR4-3200 CL16 memory, and an XPG SX8200 Pro 2TB SSD. We test across the three most common gaming resolutions, 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, at medium and ultra settings.
Where possible, we use 'reference' cards for all of these tests, like Nvidia's Founders Edition models. Most mid-range and lower GPUs do not have reference models, however, and in some cases we only have factory overclocked cards for testing. One specific card deserves a call-out: the RX 580 8GB card we tested is a heavily overclocked Sapphire Nitro+ Limited Edition, which is why it sometimes even manages to beat the RX 590. It's the only 580 currently in our GPU labs, however, so we rolled with it. (A 'normal' RX 580 would be about 10% slower.)
Our current test suite of games consists of nine titles. The data in the following charts is from testing conducted in June 2020. Note that a few games (Red Dead Redemption 2 and The Division 2) may not run on all GPUs, and we have interpolated data for the overall score to keep the charts consistent. You need at least a 4GB card for 1080p ultra in RDR2, and 6GB or more for 4K ultra. (Omitting the results for RDR2 skews the average performance chart slightly, which is why we interpolated results.)
The following charts contain the most common 40 GPUs of the past six years, give or take. We have included everything from the Titan RTX down to the 'ancient' GTX 970 and R9 390, plus all of latest AMD Navi and Nvidia Turing GPUs. The charts are color coded with AMD in red/grey and Nvidia in blue/black to make it easier to see what's going on.
1080p Medium
1080p Ultra
1440p Medium
1440p Ultra
4K Medium
4K Ultra
Besides performance, we also test graphics card power consumption. We recently retested all current GPUs using Powenetics equipment and software, and found that Nvidia generally maintains an efficiency lead. Here are the main power charts from our testing:
All GPUs Ranked
Our full GPU hierarchy ranks all current in previous generation GPUs by performance, using aggregate data from the gaming test suite. Below is the abbreviated hierarchy with all the cards you can still buy (plus a few extras) ranked in order of performance, from best to worst. The score represents aggregate performance, scaled relative to the Titan RTX.
| Score | GPU | Base/Boost | Memory | Power | Buy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia Titan RTX | 100.0% | TU102 | 1350/1770 MHz | 24GB GDDR6 | 280W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 94.4% | TU102 | 1350/1635 MHz | 11GB GDDR6 | 260W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 83.1% | TU104 | 1650/1815 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 250W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 | 78.1% | TU104 | 1515/1800 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 225W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 74.0% | TU104 | 1605/1770 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 215W | |
| AMD Radeon VII | 73.5% | Vega 20 | 1400/1750 MHz | 16GB HBM2 | 300W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | 70.3% | Navi 10 | 1605/1905 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 225W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 | 66.2% | TU106 | 1410/1710 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 185W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | 63.7% | Navi 10 | 1465/1725 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 185W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 62.9% | TU106 | 1470/1650 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 175W | |
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | 60.5% | Vega 10 | 1274/1546 MHz | 8GB HBM2 | 295W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | 57.7% | Navi 10 | ?/1615 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 150W | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 | 55.9% | TU106 | 1365/1680 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 160W | |
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | 53.3% | Vega 10 | 1156/1471 MHz | 8GB HBM2 | 210W | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 47.2% | TU116 | 1365/1680 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 120W | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 46.9% | TU116 | 1530/1785 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 125W | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 | 41.0% | TU116 | 1530/1785 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 120W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 590 | 40.4% | Polaris 30 | 1469/1545 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 225W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | 39.4% | Navi 14 | ?/1717 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 130W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | 38.6% | Polaris 20 | 1257/1340 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 185W | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super | 35.5% | TU116 | 1530/1725 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 100W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | 35.4% | Navi 14 | ?/1717 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 130W | |
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | 31.5% | Polaris 20 | 1168/1244 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 150W | |
| Nvidia GTX 1650 GDDR6 | 29.8% | TU117 | 1410/1590 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 75W | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 | 26.1% | TU117 | 1485/1665 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 75W |
Want to comment on our best graphics picks for gaming? Let us know what you think in the Tom's Hardware Forums.