Our GPU benchmarks hierarchy ranks all the current and previous generation graphics cards by performance, including all of the best graphics cards. Whether it's playing games or doing high-end creative work like 4K video editing, your graphics card typically plays the biggest role in determining performance, and even the best CPUs for Gaming take a secondary role.
We've revamped our GPU testbed and updated all of our benchmarks for 2022, and are nearly finished retesting every graphics card from the past several generations. We have completed testing of the current generation AMD RDNA 2 and Nvidia Ampere GPUs, the Turing and RDNA series as well, and many of the other generations as well. Most of what remains are either budget offerings or extreme Titan cards, or cards that are no longer supported with the current drivers. We'll continue to flesh out the remaining holes with more GPUs as we complete testing.
We've got our full hierarchy using traditional rendering first, and below that, we have our ray tracing GPU benchmarks. Those of course require a ray tracing capable GPU so only AMD's RX 6000-series and Nvidia's RTX cards are present. Below our main tables, you'll find our 2020–2021 benchmark suite, which has all of the previous generation GPUs running our older test suite running on a Core i9-9900K testbed. We also have the legacy GPU hierarchy (without benchmarks) at the bottom of the article.
The following tables sort everything solely by our performance-based GPU gaming benchmarks, at 1080p "ultra" for the main suite and at 1080p "medium" for the DXR suite. Factors including price, graphics card power consumption, overall efficiency, and other features aren't factored into the rankings here. New to the charts this month are the RTX 3090 Ti, using an Asus TUF Gaming OC (the review will be up soon) — note that this has a factory overclock, so it's not quite on the same playing field as the rest of the reference cards. We're still waiting for the Intel Arc Alchemist desktop release, and there are rumors of AMD releasing some new RX 6x50 XT models, but otherwise we're not looking forward to the latter part of the year when the Nvidia Ada and AMD RDNA 3 architectures should arrive.
We've switched to a new Alder Lake Core i9-12900K testbed, changed up our test suite, and are retesting all of the past several generations of GPUs. We've completed most of our tests now but will continue to add some older GPUs as we finish testing them.
Graphics Card Deals
The component shortages and skyrocketing demand that have been killing graphics card availability and GPU prices seem to be coming to an end, at least for now. We've got some advice on how to find graphics card savings in our RTX 3080 deals, RTX 3070 deals, and RTX 3060 deals pages. But if you shop around, we're starting to see graphics cards in stock at places like Newegg, still at inflated prices, but not nearly as bad as they were a few months back.
One alternative to buying a new graphics card is to purchase a prebuilt desktop that has your GPU of choice within. You can either pull the card and resell the PC or, choose a gaming desktop you really like and make it a complete upgrade. Here are some quick links to help you find a graphics card deal on a system if you go this route, along with a direct link so you can see what the latest prices are on the open market.
- Newegg: Up to 26% Off RTX 3060, 3070 and 3080 Desktops
- Best Buy: Up to $400 Off RTX 3060, 3070 and 3080 Laptops
- eBay: Latest deals on RTX 3060, 3070 and 3080 cards
GPU Benchmarks Ranking 2022
For our latest benchmarks, we test all GPUs at 1080p medium and 1080p ultra, and sort the table by the 1080p ultra results. Where it makes sense, we also test at 1440p ultra and 4K ultra. All of the scores are scaled relative to the top-ranking 1080p ultra card, which in our new suite is the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Yes, it's a $2,000 graphics card, but do note that the regular RTX 3090 still tends to go for that same price.
You can also see the above summary chart showing the relative performance of the cards we've tested across the past several generations of hardware at 1080p ultra. There are a few missing options (e.g., the GTX 1650 GDDR6, GT 1030, and several Titan cards), but otherwise it's nearly complete now.
The eight games we're using for our standard GPU benchmarks hierarchy are Borderlands 3 (DX12), Far Cry 6 (DX12), Flight Simulator (DX12), Forza Horizon 5 (DX12), Horizon Zero Dawn (DX12), Red Dead Redemption 2 (Vulkan), Total War Warhammer 3 (DX11), and Watch Dogs Legion (DX12). The fps score is the geometric mean (equal weighting) of the eight games.
Graphics Card | 1080p Ultra | 1080p Medium | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 100.0% (132.4fps) | 100.0% (180.1fps) | 100.0% (113.9fps) | 100.0% (75.7fps) | GA102, 10752 shaders, 1860MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | 98.6% (130.6fps) | 103.4% (186.2fps) | 94.0% (107.0fps) | 83.1% (62.9fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 3090 | 95.6% (126.6fps) | 98.9% (178.1fps) | 93.6% (106.5fps) | 90.9% (68.8fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 94.0% (124.5fps) | 99.0% (178.2fps) | 91.3% (104.0fps) | 87.6% (66.3fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | 94.0% (124.5fps) | 100.3% (180.7fps) | 88.9% (101.2fps) | 77.3% (58.5fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 93.2% (123.4fps) | 97.1% (174.9fps) | 90.8% (103.4fps) | 87.8% (66.5fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 87.8% (116.3fps) | 96.3% (173.4fps) | 83.9% (95.5fps) | 80.1% (60.6fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W |
Radeon RX 6800 | 84.3% (111.7fps) | 96.8% (174.3fps) | 76.9% (87.5fps) | 66.7% (50.5fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 78.6% (104.1fps) | 90.2% (162.4fps) | 72.5% (82.6fps) | 61.9% (46.8fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W |
Titan RTX | 75.6% (100.1fps) | 87.9% (158.2fps) | 70.7% (80.5fps) | 63.8% (48.3fps) | TU102, 4608 shaders, 1770MHz, 24GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 672GB/s, 280W |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 75.3% (99.8fps) | 87.5% (157.7fps) | 68.0% (77.5fps) | 57.0% (43.2fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | 72.5% (96.0fps) | 88.7% (159.8fps) | 61.9% (70.4fps) | 50.9% (38.5fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/s, 230W |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 72.5% (96.0fps) | 84.2% (151.6fps) | 66.1% (75.3fps) | 58.9% (44.6fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 69.1% (91.5fps) | 83.1% (149.7fps) | 61.2% (69.7fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 64.1% (84.9fps) | 76.5% (137.8fps) | 57.0% (64.9fps) | 45.6% (34.5fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 2080 | 62.1% (82.2fps) | 73.9% (133.1fps) | 54.8% (62.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | 59.1% (78.2fps) | 76.0% (136.8fps) | 48.2% (54.9fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W | |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 57.7% (76.4fps) | 68.9% (124.1fps) | 50.4% (57.4fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | 55.7% (73.7fps) | 69.9% (125.8fps) | 46.8% (53.3fps) | 38.6% (29.3fps) | Navi 10, 2560 shaders, 1905MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 225W |
GeForce RTX 3060 | 53.0% (70.2fps) | 66.0% (118.8fps) | 46.2% (52.6fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W | |
Radeon VII | 52.6% (69.7fps) | 63.3% (114.0fps) | 46.5% (53.0fps) | 41.5% (31.4fps) | Vega 20, 3840 shaders, 1750MHz, 16GB HBM2@2.0Gbps, 1024GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 2070 | 51.3% (67.9fps) | 61.5% (110.7fps) | 44.8% (51.0fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
Radeon RX 6600 | 50.4% (66.7fps) | 65.4% (117.8fps) | 40.5% (46.1fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W | |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 50.3% (66.5fps) | 61.4% (110.6fps) | 44.1% (50.3fps) | 39.0% (29.5fps) | GP102, 3584 shaders, 1582MHz, 11GB GDDR5X@11Gbps, 484GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 49.1% (65.1fps) | 58.8% (105.9fps) | 42.4% (48.2fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
Radeon RX 5700 | 49.0% (64.8fps) | 61.8% (111.3fps) | 41.4% (47.2fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 180W | |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | 43.9% (58.1fps) | 55.8% (100.6fps) | 36.9% (42.0fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1750MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | |
Radeon RX Vega 64 | 42.9% (56.8fps) | 52.4% (94.3fps) | 36.5% (41.6fps) | 31.0% (23.5fps) | Vega 10, 4096 shaders, 1546MHz, 8GB HBM2@1.89Gbps, 484GB/s, 295W |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 41.7% (55.2fps) | 53.8% (96.8fps) | 34.0% (38.7fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | |
GeForce GTX 1080 | 40.1% (53.1fps) | 50.0% (90.0fps) | 34.6% (39.4fps) | GP104, 2560 shaders, 1733MHz, 8GB GDDR5X@10Gbps, 320GB/s, 180W | |
GeForce RTX 3050 | 38.8% (51.4fps) | 49.6% (89.4fps) | 33.0% (37.6fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 38.6% (51.1fps) | 47.6% (85.8fps) | 33.3% (37.9fps) | GP104, 2432 shaders, 1683MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 180W | |
Radeon RX Vega 56 | 38.2% (50.6fps) | 46.9% (84.4fps) | 32.5% (37.0fps) | Vega 10, 3584 shaders, 1471MHz, 8GB HBM2@1.6Gbps, 410GB/s, 210W | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 33.8% (44.8fps) | 35.5% (64.0fps) | 34.1% (38.8fps) | GP104, 1920 shaders, 1683MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 150W | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 33.6% (44.4fps) | 46.0% (82.8fps) | 27.6% (31.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 125W | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 33.1% (43.9fps) | 45.4% (81.9fps) | 27.7% (31.6fps) | TU116, 1536 shaders, 1770MHz, 6GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 288GB/s, 120W | |
GeForce GTX 1660 | 30.1% (39.9fps) | 41.7% (75.1fps) | 25.0% (28.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | 30.1% (39.8fps) | 40.3% (72.6fps) | 25.0% (28.5fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | |
Radeon RX 590 | 29.7% (39.4fps) | 38.1% (68.6fps) | 25.5% (29.1fps) | Polaris 30, 2304 shaders, 1545MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 225W | |
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 27.1% (35.9fps) | 34.7% (62.6fps) | 23.4% (26.7fps) | GM200, 2816 shaders, 1075MHz, 6GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 336GB/s, 250W | |
Radeon R9 Fury X | 26.7% (35.4fps) | 35.8% (64.4fps) | Fiji, 4096 shaders, 1050MHz, 4GB HBM2@2Gbps, 512GB/s, 275W | ||
Radeon RX 580 8GB | 26.7% (35.3fps) | 34.3% (61.7fps) | 22.8% (26.0fps) | Polaris 20, 2304 shaders, 1340MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 185W | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | 25.3% (33.5fps) | 37.2% (66.9fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 4GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 Super | 25.1% (33.2fps) | 37.7% (67.9fps) | 20.2% (23.0fps) | TU116, 1280 shaders, 1725MHz, 4GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 192GB/s, 100W | |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 24.3% (32.2fps) | 32.2% (58.0fps) | 20.2% (23.0fps) | GP106, 1280 shaders, 1708MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | |
Radeon RX 6500 XT | 23.0% (30.4fps) | 36.3% (65.4fps) | 15.8% (18.0fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W | |
Radeon R9 390 | 22.5% (29.8fps) | 28.4% (51.2fps) | Grenada, 2560 shaders, 1000MHz, 8GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 384GB/s, 275W | ||
GeForce GTX 980 | 21.8% (28.9fps) | 29.8% (53.7fps) | GM204, 2048 shaders, 1216MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 256GB/s, 165W | ||
Radeon RX 570 4GB | 21.4% (28.3fps) | 29.8% (53.6fps) | 17.5% (20.0fps) | Polaris 20, 2048 shaders, 1244MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 224GB/s, 150W | |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB * | 21.0% (27.8fps) | 29.2% (52.6fps) | GP106, 1152 shaders, 1708MHz, 3GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 | 20.1% (26.6fps) | 28.4% (51.1fps) | TU117, 896 shaders, 1665MHz, 4GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 128GB/s, 75W | ||
GeForce GTX 970 | 20.0% (26.5fps) | 27.3% (49.1fps) | GM204, 1664 shaders, 1178MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 256GB/s, 145W | ||
GeForce GTX 780 * | 16.6% (22.0fps) | 21.4% (38.5fps) | GK110, 2304 shaders, 900MHz, 3GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 288GB/s, 230W | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 15.0% (19.8fps) | 21.1% (38.0fps) | GP107, 768 shaders, 1392MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 75W | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 * | 11.2% (14.8fps) | 16.5% (29.8fps) | GP107, 640 shaders, 1455MHz, 2GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 75W | ||
Radeon RX 560 4GB | 11.2% (14.8fps) | 17.7% (31.8fps) | Baffin, 1024 shaders, 1275MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 60-80W | ||
Radeon RX 550 4GB | Not Tested | 10.9% (19.6fps) | Lexa, 640 shaders, 1183MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 50W |
*: GPU couldn't run all tests, so the overall score is slightly skewed at 1080p ultra.
Our updated test suite and testbed favor AMD's GPUs slightly, particularly at 1080p and even 1440p — which is perhaps one more reason the RTX 3090 Ti exists, as it mostly retakes the throne at all resolutions, though the 6900 XT still claims top honors at 1080p medium. Keep in mind that we're not including any ray tracing or DLSS results in the above table, as we intend to use the same test suite with the same settings on all current and previous generation graphics cards.
While the 3090 Ti now reigns supreme, it does so with an enormous cost, in dollars as well as watts. It's effectively twice the price of the RX 6900 XT, and uses over 50% more power, for marginal performance gains. Stepping back from that GPU, the 3090 and 3080 12GB — an overclocked MSI model, since there are no reference 3080 12GB cards — place just ahead of the 6800 XT, followed by the 3080 Ti. The RX 6800 also beats the RTX 3070 Ti, while the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT are effectively tied.
The rankings favor AMD less at the lower portion of the chart, with the RTX 3060 and RX 6600 also tied, and the RTX 3050 easily eclipses the RX 6500 XT — not that it's difficult to do so, as both the 4GB and 8GB RX 5500 XT also beat AMD's latest budget offering.
Turning to the previous generation GPUs, the RTX 20-series and GTX 16-series chips end up scattered throughout the results, along with the RX 5000-series. The general rule of thumb is that you get one or two "model upgrades" with the newer architecture, so for example the RTX 2080 Super comes in just below the RTX 3060 Ti, while the RX 5700 XT lands a few percent behind the RX 6600 XT.
Go back far enough, and you can see how modern games at ultra settings severely punish cards that don't have more than 4GB VRAM. We've been saying for a few years now that 4GB is just scraping by, and 6GB or more is desirable. The GTX 1060 3GB, GTX 1050, and GTX 780 actually failed to run some of our tests, which skews their results a bit, even though they do better at 1080p medium.
Now let's switch over to the ray tracing hierarchy.
Ray Tracing GPU Benchmarks Ranking 2022
Enabling ray tracing, particularly with demanding games like those we're using in our DXR test suite, can cause framerates to drop off a cliff. We're testing with "medium" and "ultra" ray tracing settings. Medium means using medium graphics settings but turning on ray tracing effects (set to "medium" if that's an option), while ultra turns on all of the RT options at more or less maximum quality.
Because ray tracing is so much more demanding, we're sorting these results by the 1080p medium scores. That's also because the RX 6500 XT basically can't handle ray tracing even at these settings, and testing at anything more than 1080p medium would be fruitless. We've now finished with all the current ray tracing capable GPUs, though there will be more in the future. We're definitely curious to see if Intel's Arc GPUs can do any better than the RX 6500 XT, and suspect the answer might be "nope" on the lower tier A300 series.
The six ray tracing games we're using are Bright Memory Infinite, Control Ultimate Edition, Cyberpunk 2077, Fortnite, Metro Exodus Enhanced, and Minecraft — all of these use the DirectX 12 / DX12 Ultimate API. The fps score is the geometric mean (equal weighting) of the six games, and the percentage is scaled relative to the fastest GPU in the list, which in this case is the GeForce RTX 3090.
Graphics Card | 1080p Medium | 1080p Ultra | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 100.0% (118.2fps) | 100.0% (84.4fps) | 100.0% (57.2fps) | 100.0% (29.1fps) | GA102, 10752 shaders, 1860MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W |
GeForce RTX 3090 | 91.7% (108.4fps) | 89.7% (75.7fps) | 88.7% (50.8fps) | 87.2% (25.4fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 89.3% (105.6fps) | 87.6% (73.9fps) | 86.0% (49.2fps) | 84.6% (24.7fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 88.5% (104.7fps) | 85.8% (72.4fps) | 83.7% (47.9fps) | 81.4% (23.7fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 81.5% (96.3fps) | 78.5% (66.3fps) | 76.3% (43.7fps) | 72.2% (21.0fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 66.3% (78.4fps) | 63.0% (53.1fps) | 59.2% (33.9fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W | |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | 63.0% (74.5fps) | 59.0% (49.8fps) | 55.2% (31.6fps) | 51.7% (15.1fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
Titan RTX | 62.5% (73.9fps) | 58.2% (49.1fps) | 55.4% (31.7fps) | 52.5% (15.3fps) | TU102, 4608 shaders, 1770MHz, 24GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 672GB/s, 280W |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 62.1% (73.4fps) | 58.7% (49.6fps) | 54.9% (31.4fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 59.2% (70.0fps) | 55.1% (46.5fps) | 52.0% (29.7fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/s, 250W | |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | 59.0% (69.7fps) | 54.6% (46.1fps) | 51.3% (29.4fps) | 48.2% (14.0fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 55.2% (65.3fps) | 51.3% (43.3fps) | 47.8% (27.4fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W | |
Radeon RX 6800 | 50.4% (59.6fps) | 46.6% (39.3fps) | 43.6% (24.9fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 49.6% (58.6fps) | 45.0% (37.9fps) | 41.6% (23.8fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 | 47.5% (56.2fps) | 42.5% (35.9fps) | 39.1% (22.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 43.6% (51.5fps) | 39.2% (33.1fps) | 35.5% (20.3fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
GeForce RTX 3060 | 41.2% (48.7fps) | 38.3% (32.3fps) | 35.1% (20.1fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W | |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | 38.8% (45.9fps) | 36.1% (30.5fps) | 32.6% (18.7fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/s, 230W | |
GeForce RTX 2070 | 38.5% (45.5fps) | 34.9% (29.4fps) | 31.6% (18.1fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 36.9% (43.6fps) | 33.0% (27.9fps) | 29.9% (17.1fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 31.8% (37.6fps) | 26.7% (22.5fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | ||
Radeon RX 6600 XT | 30.8% (36.4fps) | 28.0% (23.6fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W | ||
GeForce RTX 3050 | 29.4% (34.8fps) | 27.0% (22.8fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | ||
Radeon RX 6600 | 25.8% (30.5fps) | 23.3% (19.6fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W | ||
Radeon RX 6500 XT | 7.9% (9.4fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W |
Where AMD can come very close to the top in our standard test suite, and even take it at some settings, once we enable ray tracing, the best AMD can do is seventh place, just barely ahead of the Titan RTX, RTX 3070, and RTX 2080 Ti. It's a precipitous drop, and we're not even using DLSS, which all six of our DXR games support.
You can see what DLSS Quality mode did for performance on the MSI RTX 3080 12GB in our review, but the short summary is that it boosted performance by 50% at 1080p ultra, 67% at 1440p ultra, and 96% at 4K ultra — with that last taking performance from an unplayable 26 fps average to a comfortable 51 fps. You can also legitimately use the Balanced and Performance modes without killing image quality, especially at 4K, which will deliver even larger gains.
Without some form of upscaling — and FSR 2.0 should prove beneficial here, if AMD can get widespread adoption — AMD's fastest GPUs can barely manage 1440p at more than 30 fps. Also note that none of the GPUs can handle native 4K in all of the games, though the RTX 3080 was 45% faster than the RX 6900 XT, and the RTX 3090 Ti was 93% faster. Hopefully the upcoming Nvidia Ada and AMD RDNA 3 GPUs will be able to handle 4K at native resolution while reaching playable framerates, but even then we expect DLSS or some other upscaling algorithm will be necessary for 60 fps or more.
The midrange GPUs like the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT basically manage 1080p ultra and not much more, while the bottom tier of DXR-capable GPUs barely manage 1080p medium — and the RX 6500 XT can't even do that, with single digit framerates in most of our test suite, and one game that wouldn't even work at our chosen "medium" settings. (Control requires at least 6GB VRAM to let you enabled ray tracing.)
It's also interesting to look at the generational performance of Nvidia's RTX cards. The slowest 20-series GPU, the RTX 2060, still outperforms the new RTX 3050 by a bit, but the fastest RTX 2080 Ti comes in a bit behind the RTX 3070. Where the 2080 Ti basically doubled the performance of the 2060, the 3090 delivers about triple the performance of the 3050.
2020-2021 GPU Benchmarks Ranking
The results below are from our previous version of the GPU benchmarks hierarchy, using a different test suite and combining results from nine games with six resolution and setting combinations. All of the scores are combined (via a geometric mean calculation) into a single overall result, which tends to penalize the fastest and slowest GPUs — CPU bottlenecks come into play at 1080p medium, while VRAM limitations can kill performance at 4K ultra.
These results have not been updated since early 2022, when we added the RTX 3050 and RX 6500 XT to the list. We won't be adding future GPUs to this table, but it does help to provide a look at a slightly less demanding suite of games, which 6GB or more VRAM isn't generally required at 1080p ultra settings. You can use these older results to help inform your purchase decisions, if you don't generally run the latest games at maxed out settings.
Score | GPU | Base/Boost | Memory | Power | Buy | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 | 100.0% | GA102 | 1400/1695 MHz | 24GB GDDR6X | 350W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 97.9% | GA102 | 1370/1665 MHz | 12GB GDDR6X | 350W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | 97.0% | Navi 21 | 1825/2250 MHz | 16GB GDDR6 | 300W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | 93.5% | Navi 21 | 1825/2250 MHz | 16GB GDDR6 | 300W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 | 93.2% | GA102 | 1440/1710 MHz | 10GB GDDR6X | 320W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 | 85.7% | Navi 21 | 1700/2105 MHz | 16GB GDDR6 | 250W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 81.5% | GA104 | 1575/1770 MHz | 8GB GDDR6X | 290W | |
Nvidia Titan RTX | 79.5% | TU102 | 1350/1770 MHz | 24GB GDDR6 | 280W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 77.4% | TU102 | 1350/1635 MHz | 11GB GDDR6 | 260W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 | 76.3% | GA104 | 1500/1730 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 220W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | 73.3% | Navi 22 | 2321/2424 MHz | 12GB GDDR6 | 230W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 69.6% | GA104 | 1410/1665 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 200W | |
Nvidia Titan V | 68.7% | GV100 | 1200/1455 MHz | 12GB HBM2 | 250W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 66.8% | TU104 | 1650/1815 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 250W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 | 62.5% | TU104 | 1515/1800 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 225W | |
Nvidia Titan Xp | 61.1% | GP102 | 1405/1480 MHz | 12GB GDDR5X | 250W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 59.6% | TU104 | 1605/1770 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 215W | |
AMD Radeon VII | 58.9% | Vega 20 | 1400/1750 MHz | 16GB HBM2 | 300W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 57.8% | GP102 | 1480/1582 MHz | 11GB GDDR5X | 250W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | 57.7% | Navi 23 | 1968/2589 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 160W | |
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | 57.0% | Navi 10 | 1605/1905 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 225W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 54.7% | GA106 | 1320/1777 MHz | 12GB GDDR6 | 170W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 | 53.1% | TU106 | 1410/1710 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 185W | |
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | 51.4% | Navi 10 | 1465/1725 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 185W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 50.6% | TU106 | 1470/1650 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 175W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6600 | 49.2% | Navi 23 | 1626/2491 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 132W | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | 48.4% | Vega 10 | 1274/1546 MHz | 8GB HBM2 | 295W | |
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | 46.6% | Navi 10 | ?/1615 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 150W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 | 45.2% | GP104 | 1607/1733 MHz | 8GB GDDR5X | 180W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 | 44.9% | TU106 | 1365/1680 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 160W | |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | 42.7% | Vega 10 | 1156/1471 MHz | 8GB HBM2 | 210W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 41.8% | GP104 | 1607/1683 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 180W | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 | 40.5% | GA106 | 1552/1777 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 130W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 37.9% | TU116 | 1530/1785 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 125W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 37.8% | TU116 | 1365/1680 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 120W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 | 36.7% | GP104 | 1506/1683 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 150W | |
Nvidia GTX Titan X (Maxwell) | 35.3% | GM200 | 1000/1075 MHz | 12GB GDDR5 | 250 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 32.9% | GM200 | 1000/1075 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 250W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 | 32.8% | TU116 | 1530/1785 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 120W | |
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X | 32.7% | Fiji | 1050 MHz | 4GB HBM | 275W | |
AMD Radeon RX 590 | 32.4% | Polaris 30 | 1469/1545 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 225W | |
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | 31.8% | Navi 14 | ?/1717 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 130W | |
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | 30.9% | Polaris 20 | 1257/1340 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 185W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super | 28.5% | TU116 | 1530/1725 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 100W | |
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | 28.4% | Navi 14 | ?/1717 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 130W | |
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | 27.7% | Navi 24 | 2610/2815 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 107W | |
AMD Radeon R9 390 | 27.2% | Hawaii | 1000 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 275W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 26.5% | GP106 | 1506/1708 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 120W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 | 26.4% | GM204 | 1126/1216 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 165W | |
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | 25.2% | Polaris 20 | 1168/1244 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 150W | |
Nvidia GTX 1650 GDDR6 | 23.8% | TU117 | 1410/1590 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 75W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 22.3% | GP106 | 1506/1708 MHz | 3GB GDDR5 | 120W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 | 22.1% | GM204 | 1050/1178 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 145W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 | 20.9% | TU117 | 1485/1665 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 75W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 16.1% | GP107 | 1290/1392 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 75W | |
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | 12.5% | Polaris 21 | 1175/1275 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 80W | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 | 12.2% | GP107 | 1354/1455 MHz | 2GB GDDR5 | 75W | |
AMD Vega 8 (R7 5700G) | 9.5% | Vega 8 | 2000 MHz | Shared | N/A | |
AMD Vega 7 (R5 5600G) | 8.8% | Vega 7 | 1900 MHz | Shared | N/A | |
AMD Radeon RX 550 | 8.0% | Polaris 22 | 1100/1183 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 50W | |
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 | 6.7% | GP108 | 1228/1468 MHz | 2GB GDDR5 | 30W | |
AMD Vega 11 (R5 3400G) | 5.5% | Vega 11 | 1400 MHz | Shared | N/A | |
AMD Vega 8 (R3 3200G) | 4.9% | Vega 8 | 1250 MHz | Shared | N/A | |
Intel Iris Xe DG1 | 4.4% | Xe DG1 | 1550 MHz | 4GB LPDDR4X | 30W | |
Intel Iris Plus (i7-1065G7) | 3.0% | Gen11 ICL-U | 1100 MHz | Shared | N/A | |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (i7-10700K) | 1.8% | Gen9.5 CFL | 1200 MHz | 2x8GB DDR4-3200 | N/A |
Choosing a Graphics Card
Which graphics card do you need? To help you decide, we created this GPU benchmarks hierarchy consisting of dozens of GPUs from the past four generations of hardware. Not surprisingly, the fastest cards use either Nvidia's Ampere architecture or AMD's Big Navi. AMD's latest graphics cards perform well without ray tracing, but tend to fall behind once RT gets enabled — even more so if you enable DLSS, which you should. GPU prices are still a massive hindrance to upgrading, unfortunately, and we're likely at least six months away from hitting somewhat reasonable levels.
Of course it's not just about playing games. Many applications use the GPU for other work, and we covered some professional GPU benchmarks in our RTX 3090 review. But a good graphics card for gaming will typically do equally well in complex GPU computational workloads. Buy one of the top cards and you can run games at high resolutions and frame rates with the effects turned all the way up, and you'll be able to do content creation work equally well. Drop down to the middle and lower portions of the list and you'll need to start dialing down the settings to get acceptable performance in regular game play and GPU benchmarks.
It's not just about high-end GPUs either, of course. We tested Intel's Xe Graphics DG1, which basically competes with integrated graphics solutions. The results weren't pretty, and we didn't even try running any of those at settings beyond 1080p medium. Still, you can see where those GPUs land at the very bottom of the 2020-2021 GPU benchmarks list. Thankfully, Intel's Arc Alchemist, aka DG2, appears to be cut from entirely different cloth.
If your main goal is gaming, you can't forget about the CPU. Getting the best possible gaming GPU won't help you much if your CPU is underpowered and/or out of date. So be sure to check out the Best CPUs for gaming page, as well as our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy to make sure you have the right CPU for the level of gaming you're looking to achieve.
Test System and How We Test for GPU Benchmarks
We've used two different PCs for our testing. The latest 2022 and later configuration uses an Alder Lake CPU and platform, while our previous testbed uses Coffee Lake and Z390. Here are the details of the two PCs.
Tom's Hardware 2022 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-12900K
MSI Pro Z690-A WiFi DDR4
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3600 CL16
Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
Cooler Master MWE 1250 V2 Gold
Cooler Master PL360 Flux
Cooler Master HAF500
Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Tom's Hardware 2020–2021 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-9900K
Corsair H150i Pro RGB
MSI MEG Z390 Ace
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3200
XPG SX8200 Pro 2TB
Windows 10 Pro (21H1)
For each graphics card, we follow the same testing procedure. We run one pass of each benchmark to "warm up" the GPU after launching the game, then run at least two passes at each setting/resolution combination. If the two runs are basically identical (within 0.5% or less difference), we use the faster of the two runs. If there's more than a small difference, we run the test at least twice more to determine what "normal" performance is supposed to be.
We also look at all the data and check for anomalies, so for example RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 3070, and RTX 3060 Ti all generally going to perform within a narrow range — 3070 Ti is about 5% faster than 3070, which is about 5% faster than 3060 Ti. If we see games where there are clear outliers (i.e. performance is more than 10% higher for the cards just mentioned), we'll go back and retest whatever cards are showing the anomaly and figure out what the "correct" result would be.
Due to the length of time required for testing each GPU, updated drivers and game patches inevitably will come out that can impact performance. We periodically retest a few sample cards to verify our results are still valid, and if not, we go through and retest the affected game(s) and GPU(s). We may also add games to our test suite over the coming year, if one comes out that is popular and conducive to testing — see our what makes a good game benchmark for our selection criteria.
GPU Benchmarks: Individual Game Charts
The above tables provide a summary of performance, but for those that want to see the individual game charts, for both the standard and ray tracing test suites, we've got those as well. These charts were up-to-date as of April 7, 2022, with testing conducted using the latest Nvidia 511.79 and AMD 22.2.2 drivers in most cases, though some of the cards were tested with 511.65 or 22.2.1 (but all Warhammer 3 and Cyberpunk 2077 testing used the latest drivers). The RTX 3090 Ti was also tested with 512.16, the first drivers to officially support the card.
Note that we're only including the past two generations of hardware in these charts, as otherwise things get too cramped — and you can argue that with 35 cards in the 1080p charts, we're already well past that point. (Hint: Click the enlarge icon if you're on PC.)
Also note that we've switched from DX12 to DX11 for Microsoft Flight Simulator testing, partly because DX12 started to have issues recently, partly because DX12 is still listed as "beta," but mostly because we've determined DX11 runs faster — somethings by more than 10% — on most GPUs. We've retested all of the cards in DX11 mode now.
Legacy GPU Hierarchy
Below is our legacy desktop GPU hierarchy dating back to the late 1990s. We have not tested most of these cards in many years, driver support has ended on most of these models, and the relative rankings are pretty coarse. Note that we also don't factor in memory bandwidth or features like AMD's Infinity Cache. The list below is mostly intended to show relative performance between architectures from a similar time period.
We sorted the table by the theoretical GFLOPS, though on architectures that don't support unified shaders, we only have data for "Gops/s" (giga operations per second). That's GeForce 7 and Radeon X1000 and earlier — basically anything from before 2007. We've put an asterisk (*) next to the GPU names for those cards, and they comprise the latter part of the table. Comparing pre-2007 GPUs against each other should be relatively meaningful, but trying to compare those older GPUs against newer GPUs gets a bit convoluted.
GPU | Release Date | Architecture | Shaders | Clockspeed | GFLOPS (GOps) | Launch Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | March 2022 | GA102 | 10752 | 1860 | 39,997 | $1,999 |
GeForce RTX 3090 | September 2020 | GA102 | 10496 | 1695 | 35,581 | $1,499 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | June 2021 | GA102 | 10240 | 1665 | 34,099 | $1,249 |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | January 2022 | GA102 | 8960 | 1710 | 30,643 | $1,199 |
GeForce RTX 3080 | September 2020 | GA102 | 8704 | 1710 | 29,768 | $699 |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | December 2020 | Navi 21 | 5120 | 2250 | 23,040 | $999 |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | June 2021 | GA104 | 6144 | 1770 | 21,750 | $599 |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 4608 | 2250 | 20,736 | $649 |
GeForce RTX 3070 | October 2020 | GA104 | 5888 | 1725 | 20,314 | $499 |
Nvidia Titan RTX | December 2018 | TU102 | 4608 | 1770 | 16,312 | $2,499 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | December 2020 | GA104 | 4864 | 1665 | 16,197 | $399 |
Radeon RX 6800 | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 3840 | 2105 | 16,166 | $579 |
Nvidia Titan V | December 2017 | GV100 | 5120 | 1455 | 14,899 | $2,999 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | September 2018 | TU102 | 4352 | 1545 | 13,448 | $1,199 |
Radeon VII | February 2019 | Vega 20 | 3840 | 1750 | 13,440 | $699 |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | March 2021 | Navi 22 | 2560 | 2581 | 13,215 | $479 |
GeForce RTX 3060 | February 2021 | GA106 | 3584 | 1777 | 12,738 | $329 |
Radeon RX Vega 64 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 4096 | 1546 | 12,665 | $499 |
Radeon R9 295X2 | April 2014 | Vesuvius (x2) | 5632 | 1018 | 11,467 | $1,499 |
Nvidia Titan Xp | April 2017 | GP102 | 3840 | 1480 | 11,366 | $1,199 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | March 2017 | GP102 | 3584 | 1582 | 11,340 | $699 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super | July 2019 | TU104 | 3072 | 1815 | 11,151 | $699 |
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) | August 2016 | GP102 | 3584 | 1531 | 10,974 | $1,199 |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | August 2021 | Navi 23 | 2048 | 2589 | 10,605 | $379 |
Radeon RX Vega 56 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 3584 | 1471 | 10,544 | $399 |
GeForce GTX Titan Z | May 2014 | 2x GK110 | 5760 | 876 | 10,092 | $2,999 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | September 2018 | TU104 | 2944 | 1710 | 10,068 | $699 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2560 | 1905 | 9,754 | $399 |
GeForce RTX 3050 | January 2022 | GA106 | 2560 | 1777 | 9,098 | $249 |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super | July 2019 | TU104 | 2560 | 1770 | 9,062 | $499 |
Radeon RX 6600 | October 2021 | Navi 23 | 1792 | 2491 | 8,928 | $329 |
GeForce GTX 1080 | May 2016 | GP104 | 2560 | 1733 | 8,873 | $599 ($499) |
Radeon R9 Fury X | June 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1050 | 8,602 | $649 |
Radeon R9 Nano | August 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $649 |
Radeon HD 7990 | April 2013 | New Zealand (x2) | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $1,000 |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | November 2017 | GP104 | 2432 | 1683 | 8,186 | $449 |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | January 2020 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1750 | 8,064 | $279 |
Radeon RX 5700 | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1725 | 7,949 | $249 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | October 2018 | TU106 | 2304 | 1620 | 7,465 | $499 |
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | July 2019 | TU106 | 2176 | 1650 | 7,181 | $399 |
Radeon R9 Fury | July 2015 | Fiji | 3584 | 1000 | 7,168 | $549 |
Radeon RX 590 | November 2018 | Polaris 30 | 2304 | 1545 | 7,119 | $279 |
GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) | March 2015 | GM200 | 3072 | 1075 | 6,605 | $999 |
GeForce GTX 1070 | June 2016 | GP104 | 1920 | 1683 | 6,463 | $379 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | January 2019 | TU106 | 1920 | 1680 | 6,451 | $349 |
GeForce GTX 690 | April 2012 | 2x GK104 | 3072 | 1019 | 6,261 | $1,000 |
Radeon RX 580 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $229 |
Radeon RX 580 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | June 2015 | GM200 | 2816 | 1075 | 6,054 | $649 |
Radeon R9 390X | June 2015 | Grenada | 2816 | 1050 | 5,914 | $429 |
Radeon RX 480 8GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $239 |
Radeon RX 480 4GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $199 |
Radeon RX 6500 XT | January 2022 | Navi 24 | 1024 | 2815 | 5,765 | $199 |
GeForce GTX Titan Black | February 2014 | GK110 | 2880 | 980 | 5,645 | $999 |
Radeon R9 290X | October 2013 | Hawaii | 2816 | 1000 | 5,632 | $549 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | February 2019 | TU116 | 1536 | 1770 | 5,437 | $279 |
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | November 2013 | GK110 | 2880 | 928 | 5,345 | $699 |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $199 |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $169 |
Radeon R9 390 | June 2015 | Grenada | 2560 | 1000 | 5,120 | $329 |
Radeon HD 6990 | March 2011 | Antilles (2x) | 3072 | 830 | 5,100 | $699 |
Radeon RX 570 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $199 |
Radeon RX 570 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $169 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Super | October 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1785 | 5,027 | $229 |
GeForce GTX 980 | September 2014 | GM204 | 2048 | 1216 | 4,981 | $549 |
Radeon RX 470 4GB | August 2016 | Ellesmere | 2048 | 1206 | 4,940 | $179 |
GeForce GTX 1660 | March 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1725 | 4,858 | $219 |
Radeon R9 290 | November 2013 | Hawaii | 2560 | 947 | 4,849 | $399 |
GeForce GTX Titan | February 2013 | GK110 | 2688 | 876 | 4,709 | $999 |
Radeon HD 5970 | November 2009 | Hemlock (2x) | 3200 | 725 | 4,640 | $599 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | July 2016 | GP106 | 1280 | 1708 | 4,372 | $249 |
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | June 2012 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1050 | 4,301 | $500 |
GeForce GTX 780 | May 2013 | GK110 | 2304 | 900 | 4,147 | $649 ($499) |
Radeon R9 280X | August 2013 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1000 | 4,096 | $299 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Super | November 2019 | TU116 | 1280 | 1590 | 4,070 | $159 |
Radeon R9 380X | November 2015 | Tonga | 2048 | 970 | 3,973 | $229 |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | August 2016 | GP106 | 1152 | 1708 | 3,935 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 970 | September 2014 | GM204 | 1664 | 1178 | 3,920 | $329 |
Radeon R9 380 | June 2015 | Tonga | 1792 | 970 | 3,476 | $199 |
Radeon R9 280 | March 2014 | Tahiti | 1792 | 933 | 3,344 | $249 |
GeForce GTX 770 | May 2013 | GK104 | 1536 | 1085 | 3,333 | $399 ($329) |
Radeon R9 285 | September 2014 | Tonga | 1792 | 918 | 3,290 | $249 |
GeForce GTX 680 | March 2012 | GK104 | 1536 | 1058 | 3,250 | $500 |
Radeon HD 7870 XT | November 2012 | Tahiti | 1536 | 975 | 2,995 | $270 |
GeForce GTX 1650 | April 2019 | TU117 | 896 | 1665 | 2,984 | $149 |
Radeon HD 7950 | January 2012 | Tahiti | 1792 | 800 | 2,867 | $450 |
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 | April 2020 | TU117 | 896 | 1590 | 2,849 | $149 |
Radeon HD 5870 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1600 | 850 | 2,720 | $379 |
Radeon HD 6970 | December 2010 | Cayman | 1536 | 880 | 2,703 | $369 |
Radeon R9 270X | August 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1050 | 2,688 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 760 Ti | September 2013 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | OEM |
GeForce GTX 670 | May 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $400 |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | August 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $300 |
Radeon RX 560 4GB | May 2017 | Baffin | 1024 | 1275 | 2,611 | $99 |
Radeon R9 370X | August 2015 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1000 | 2,560 | $179 |
Radeon HD 7870 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1000 | 2,560 | $350 |
GeForce GTX 590 | March 2011 | 2x GF110 | 1024 | 607 | 2,486 | $699 |
GeForce GTX 960 | January 2015 | GM206 | 1024 | 1178 | 2,413 | $199 |
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | August 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 750 | 2,400 | $449 |
GeForce GTX 760 | June 2013 | GK104 | 1152 | 1033 | 2,380 | $249 |
Radeon R9 270 | November 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 925 | 2,368 | $179 |
Radeon HD 6950 2GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $299 |
Radeon HD 6950 1GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $259 |
Radeon RX 460 4GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $139 |
Radeon RX 460 2GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $109 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | October 2016 | GP107 | 768 | 1392 | 2,138 | $139 |
Radeon RX 560 4GB | October 2017 | Baffin | 896 | 1175 | 2,106 | $99 |
Radeon HD 5850 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1440 | 725 | 2,088 | $259 |
Radeon HD 6870 | October 2010 | Barts | 1120 | 900 | 2,016 | $239 |
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | November 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 625 | 2,000 | $339 |
Radeon R9 370 | June 2015 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 975 | 1,997 | $149 |
GeForce GTX 660 | September 2012 | GK106 | 960 | 1032 | 1,981 | $230 |
Radeon R7 260X | August 2013 | Bonaire | 896 | 1100 | 1,971 | $139 |
GeForce GTX 1050 | October 2016 | GP107 | 640 | 1518 | 1,943 | $109 |
Radeon R7 265 | February 2014 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 925 | 1,894 | $149 |
GeForce GTX 950 | August 2015 | GM206 | 768 | 1188 | 1,825 | $159 |
Radeon HD 7790 | March 2013 | Pitcairn | 896 | 1000 | 1,792 | $150 |
Radeon HD 5830 | February 2010 | Cypress | 1120 | 800 | 1,792 | $239 |
Radeon HD 7850 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 860 | 1,761 | $250 |
Radeon R7 360 | June 2015 | Bonaire | 768 | 1050 | 1,613 | $109 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | March 2013 | GK106 | 768 | 1032 | 1,585 | $170 |
GeForce GTX 580 | November 2010 | GF110 | 512 | 772 | 1,581 | $499 |
Radeon R7 260 | December 2013 | Bonaire | 768 | 1000 | 1,536 | $109 |
Radeon RX 550 | April 2017 | Lexa | 640 | 1183 | 1,514 | $79 |
Radeon HD 6850 | October 2010 | Barts | 960 | 775 | 1,488 | $179 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti | October 2012 | GK106 | 768 | 928 | 1,425 | $150 |
GeForce GTX 570 | December 2010 | GF110 | 480 | 732 | 1,405 | $349 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | February 2014 | GK107 | 640 | 1085 | 1,389 | $149 |
Radeon HD 6770 | April 2011 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $129 |
Radeon HD 5770 | October 2009 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $159 |
Radeon HD 4890 | April 2009 | RV790 | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $249 |
GeForce GTX 480 | March 2010 | GF100 | 480 | 701 | 1,346 | $499 |
Radeon HD 6790 | April 2011 | Barts | 800 | 840 | 1,344 | $149 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) | November 2011 | GF110 | 448 | 732 | 1,312 | $289 |
Radeon HD 7770 | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 640 | 1000 | 1,280 | $160 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti | January 2011 | GF114 | 384 | 822 | 1,263 | $249 |
Radeon HD 4870 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 750 | 1,200 | $299 |
GeForce GT 1030 (GDDR5) | May 2017 | GP108 | 384 | 1468 | 1,127 | $70 |
GeForce GTX 750 | February 2014 | GK107 | 512 | 1085 | 1,111 | $119 |
GeForce GTX 470 | March 2010 | GF100 | 448 | 608 | 1,090 | $349 |
GeForce GTX 560 | May 2011 | GF114 | 336 | 810 | 1,089 | $199 |
GeForce GT 1030 (DDR4) | March 2018 | GP108 | 384 | 1379 | 1,059 | $79 |
Radeon HD 3870 X2 | January 2008 | 2x R680 | 640 | 825 | 1,056 | $449 |
Radeon HD 6750 | January 2011 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | OEM |
Radeon HD 5750 | October 2009 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | $129 |
Radeon HD 4850 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 625 | 1,000 | $199 |
Radeon HD 4770 | April 2009 | RV740 | 640 | 750 | 960 | $109 |
Radeon R7 350 | February 2016 | Cape Verde | 512 | 925 | 947 | $89 |
Radeon HD 7750 (GDDR5) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 |
Radeon HD 7750 (DDR3) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 |
GeForce GTX 460 (256-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $229 |
GeForce GTX 460 (192-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 465 | May 2010 | GF100 | 352 | 608 | 856 | $279 |
GeForce GTX 560 SE | February 2012 | GF114 | 288 | 736 | 848 | OEM |
Radeon R7 250E | December 2013 | Cape Verde | 512 | 800 | 819 | $109 |
GeForce GTX 650 | September 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 1058 | 813 | $110 |
Radeon R7 250 (GDDR5) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $99 |
Radeon R7 250 (DDR3) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $89 |
Radeon HD 6670 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $109 |
Radeon HD 6670 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $99 |
GeForce 9800 GX2 | March 2008 | 2x G92 | 256 | 1500 | 768 | |
GeForce GT 740 (GDDR5) | May 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $99 |
GeForce GT 740 (DDR3) | May 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $89 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE | November 2010 | GF104 | 288 | 650 | 749 | $160 |
Radeon HD 4830 | October 2008 | RV770 | 640 | 575 | 736 | $130 |
GeForce GT 640 (GDDR5) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 950 | 730 | OEM |
GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, GDDR5) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $79 |
GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $69 |
GeForce GTX 550 Ti | March 2011 | GF116 | 192 | 900 | 691 | $149 |
Radeon HD 6570 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $89 |
Radeon HD 6570 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $79 |
Radeon HD 5670 | January 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 775 | 620 | $99 |
Radeon HD 7730 (GDDR5) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 |
Radeon HD 7730 (DDR3) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 |
GeForce GT 640 (DDR3) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 797 | 612 | OEM |
GeForce GTS 450 | September 2010 | GF106 | 192 | 783 | 601 | $129 |
GeForce GTX 295 | January 2009 | 2x GT200 | 480 | 576 | 553 | $500 |
Radeon HD 5570 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 |
Radeon HD 5570 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 |
GeForce GT 545 (GDDR5) | May 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 870 | 501 | OEM |
Radeon R7 240 | August 2013 | Oland | 320 | 780 | 499 | $69 |
Radeon HD 3870 | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 777 | 497 | $349 |
Radeon HD 4670 | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 750 | 480 | $79 |
Radeon HD 2900 XT | May 2007 | R600 | 320 | 743 | 476 | $399 |
GeForce GTS 250 | March 2009 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | $150 |
GeForce 9800 GTX+ | July 2008 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | |
GeForce 9800 GTX | April 2008 | G92 | 128 | 1688 | 432 | |
Radeon HD 3850 (512MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $189 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $179 |
Radeon HD 3830 | April 2008 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $129 |
Radeon HD 4650 (DDR3) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 650 | 416 | |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 128 | 1625 | 416 | |
GeForce GT 545 (DDR3) | May 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 720 | 415 | $149 |
Radeon HD 4650 (DDR2) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 600 | 384 | |
Radeon HD 2900 Pro | September 2007 | R600 | 320 | 600 | 384 | $300 |
GeForce 8800 Ultra | May 2007 | G80 | 128 | 1500 | 384 | |
Radeon HD 5550 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
Radeon HD 5550 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
Radeon HD 5550 (DDR2) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
GeForce 8800 GTX | November 2006 | G80 | 128 | 1350 | 346 | |
GeForce GT 630 (DDR3) | April 2012 | GK107 | 192 | 875 | 336 | OEM |
GeForce 9800 GT | July 2008 | G92a/G92b | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
GeForce 8800 GT (512MB) | October 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
GeForce 8800 GT (256MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
GeForce GTX 285 | January 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 648 | 311 | $400 |
GeForce GT 630 (GDDR5) | May 2012 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $80 |
GeForce GT 440 (GDDR5) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 |
GeForce GT 440 (GDDR3) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 |
GeForce GTX 275 | April 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 633 | 304 | $250 |
GeForce GTX 280 | June 2008 | GT200 | 240 | 602 | 289 | $650 ($430) |
Radeon HD 2900 GT | November 2007 | R600 | 240 | 600 | 288 | $200 |
GeForce GT 730 (128-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $69 |
GeForce GT 530 | May 2011 | GF118 | 96 | 700 | 269 | OEM |
GeForce GT 430 | October 2010 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $79 |
GeForce 9600 GSO | May 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | |
GeForce 8800 GS | January 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | |
GeForce GT 240 (GDDR5) | November 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM |
GeForce GT 240 (DDR3) | November 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM |
GeForce GTX 260 | September 2008 | GT200 | 216 | 576 | 249 | $300 |
Radeon HD 6450 | April 2011 | Caicos | 160 | 750 | 240 | $55 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640MB) | November 2006 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320MB) | February 2007 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | |
GeForce GTX 260 | June 2008 | GT200 | 192 | 576 | 221 | $400 ($270) |
GeForce 9600 GT | February 2008 | G94 | 64 | 1625 | 208 | |
Radeon R5 230 | April 2014 | Caicos | 160 | 625 | 200 | |
Radeon HD 2600 XT | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 800 | 192 | $149 |
Radeon HD 3650 (DDR3) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | |
Radeon HD 3650 (DDR2) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | |
GeForce GT 520 | April 2011 | GF119 | 48 | 810 | 156 | $59 |
Radeon HD 2600 Pro | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 600 | 144 | $99 |
GeForce GT 220 (DDR3) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1360 | 131 | OEM |
GeForce GT 220 (DDR2) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1335 | 128 | OEM |
Radeon HD 5450 | February 2010 | Cedar | 80 | 650 | 104 | $50 |
Radeon HD 4550 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | |
Radeon HD 4350 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | |
GeForce 8600 GTS | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1450 | 93 | |
GeForce 9500 GT (GDDR3) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | |
GeForce 9500 GT (DDR2) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | |
GeForce 8600 GT (GDDR3) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | |
GeForce 8600 GT (DDR2) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | |
GeForce GT 420 | September 2010 | GF108 | 48 | 700 | 67 | OEM |
Radeon HD 2400 XT | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 650 | 52 | $55 |
GeForce 9400 GT | August 2008 | G96 | 16 | 1400 | 45 | |
Radeon HD 2400 Pro | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 525 | 42 | |
Radeon HD 2300 | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 525 | 42 | |
GeForce 8600 GS | April 2007 | G84 | 16 | 1180 | 38 | |
Radeon X1950 XTX * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 650 | 31.2 * | $449 |
Radeon X1900 XTX * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 650 | 31.2 * | $649 |
Radeon X1950 XT * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 625 | 30.0 * | |
Radeon X1900 XT * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 625 | 30.0 * | $549 |
GeForce 8500 GT | April 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | |
GeForce 8400 GS | June 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | |
GeForce 7950 GX2 * | June 2006 | 2x G71 | 48 | 500 | 24.0 * | |
GeForce 9300 GS | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1400 | 22 | |
GeForce 9300 GE | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1300 | 21 | |
Radeon X1950 Pro * | October 2006 | RV570 | 36 | 575 | 20.7 * | |
Radeon X1900 GT * | May 2006 | R580 | 36 | 575 | 20.7 * | |
Radeon X1950 GT * | January 2007 | RV570 | 36 | 500 | 18.0 * | |
GeForce 7900 GTX * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.6 * | |
GeForce 7900 GTO * | October 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.6 * | |
GeForce 8300 GS | July 2007 | G86 | 8 | 900 | 14 | |
GeForce 7950 GT * | September 2006 | G71 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 * | |
GeForce 7800 GTX (512MB) * | November 2005 | G70 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 * | |
Radeon X1650 XT * | October 2006 | RV560 | 24 | 525 | 12.6 * | |
GeForce 7900 GT * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 450 | 10.8 * | |
GeForce 7800 GTX (256MB) * | June 2005 | G70 | 24 | 430 | 10.3 * | |
Radeon X1800 XT * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 625 | 10.0 * | $549 |
Radeon X1650 GT * | May 2007 | RV560 | 24 | 400 | 9.6 * | |
GeForce 7900 GS * | May 2006 | G71 | 20 | 450 | 9.0 * | |
Radeon X850 XT Platinum * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 540 | 8.6 * | |
Radeon X850 XT * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 520 | 8.3 * | |
Radeon X800 XT Platinum * | May 2004 | R423 | 16 | 520 | 8.3 * | |
Radeon X800 XT * | December 2004 | R423 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 * | |
Radeon X1800 XL * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 * | |
GeForce 7800 GT * | August 2005 | G70 | 20 | 400 | 8.0 * | |
Radeon X1650 Pro * | August 2006 | RV535 | 12 | 600 | 7.2 * | |
Radeon X1600 XT * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 590 | 7.1 * | |
GeForce 7600 GT * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 560 | 6.7 * | |
Radeon X800 XL * | December 2004 | R430 | 16 | 400 | 6.4 * | |
GeForce 6800 Ultra * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 400 | 6.4 * | |
Radeon X850 Pro * | December 2004 | R480 | 12 | 507 | 6.1 * | |
Radeon X1800 GTO * | March 2006 | R520 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | $249 |
Radeon X1600 Pro * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | |
Radeon X1300 XT * | August 2006 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | |
GeForce 7800 GS * | February 2006 | G70 | 16 | 375 | 6.0 * | |
Radeon X800 Pro * | May 2004 | R423 | 12 | 475 | 5.7 * | |
GeForce 6800 GT * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 350 | 5.6 * | |
GeForce 6800 GS (PCIe) * | November 2005 | NV42 | 12 | 425 | 5.1 * | |
Radeon X800 GTO (256MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
Radeon X800 GTO (128MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
GeForce 7600 GS * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
Radeon X800 * | December 2004 | R430 | 12 | 392 | 4.7 * | |
GeForce 6800 GS (AGP) * | December 2005 | NV40 | 12 | 350 | 4.2 * | |
GeForce 6600 GT * | November 2004 | NV43 | 8 | 500 | 4.0 * | |
GeForce 6800 * | November 2004 | NV41/NV42 | 12 | 325 | 3.9 * | |
Radeon X800 GT * | December 2005 | R423/R480 | 8 | 475 | 3.8 * | |
Radeon X800 SE * | October 2004 | R420 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 * | |
Radeon X700 Pro * | December 2004 | RV410 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 * | |
Radeon 9800 XT * | September 2003 | R360 | 8 | 412 | 3.3 * | |
Radeon X700 * | September 2005 | RV410 | 8 | 400 | 3.2 * | |
Radeon 9800 Pro * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 380 | 3.0 * | |
GeForce 7300 GT (GDDR3) * | May 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 * | |
GeForce 7300 GT (DDR2) * | May 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 * | |
Radeon 9800 SE (128-bit) * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
Radeon 9800 * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
Radeon 9700 Pro * | July 2002 | R300 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
GeForce 6800 XT * | September 2005 | NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
GeForce 6800 LE * | January 2005 | NV41/NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
Radeon X1300 Pro * | October 2005 | RV515 | 4 | 600 | 2.4 * | |
GeForce 6600 (128-bit) * | August 2004 | NV43 | 8 | 300 | 2.4 * | |
Radeon 9700 * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 * | |
Radeon 9500 Pro * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 * | |
GeForce 7300 GS * | January 2006 | G72 | 4 | 550 | 2.2 * | |
Radeon X600 XT * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
Radeon X1550 * | January 2007 | RV516 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
Radeon 9600 XT * | September 2003 | RV360 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | & |