Unreleased AMD RX 6500 surfaces: a 2022-era budget chip for our 2025 GPU woes

Radeon RX 6500
(Image credit: Zephyr)

Chinese graphics card manufacturer Zephyr (via 孤城Hardware) has launched the Radeon RX 6500, a never-before-seen graphics card from AMD. While the Radeon RX 6500 is unlikely to beat any of the best graphics cards today, the Navi 24-powered graphics card might be a good solution for some budget gamers.

The Radeon RX 6500 graphics card is currently absent from Zephyr's website. Identifying it as part of Zephyr's lineup relies solely on the logos present on the cooling fans. This Radeon RX 6500 ITX version isn't the only offering from Zephyr, as the manufacturer has listed the Radeon RX 6500LP, which features a low-profile, single-slot design utilizing a blower-type cooling system.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • usertests
    Not sure why it wouldn't use a 70-75 Watt TDP. Maybe they have to use RX 6400 firmware or something, since it's an unofficial card?

    I hope we see some/any 75W, 8 GB cards this generation.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    They've been available to OEM's for a couple of years or so, they're just being released to the general public now, im assuming its just because they have so many of them now that they may as well. If the RX 6400 and 6500 cards weren't so relatively expensive they would be worth it for budget SFF gaming applications, especially the rare 8gb versions.

    https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/does-anyone-know-what-the-rx-6500-is.325360/
    Reply
  • Notton
    The one thing that totally killed any potential for Navi24 on my machine, aside from the ridiculous price, was it's lack of AV1 decode. Not only that, it doesn't feature any kind of video encode, and barely has any decoders at all, relegating most of the work to the CPU.
    Which would be fine if your CPU had an iGPU with video decoders already in the silicon....
    but in 2022, the Ryzen 5800X3D (and AM4 without an iGPU) was a popular choice.
    And if you were on AM4, but your mobo was only PCIe 3.0 capable (because why would you upgrade from a 300 series chipset unless your mobo broke?), Navi24 would become bottlenecked by it's.... take a guess...
    PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes being cut down to 3.0.

    And Navi24 is still is a poor choice in 2025, unless it costs $50.
    Oh you want to add more monitors to your setup?
    Too bad the 6500XT (the max config) only supports 2 monitors.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    As a funny comparison a Threadripper 3970X using DDR4-3200 in quad-channel has about the same memory bandwidth as this card!
    Reply
  • usertests
    Notton said:
    The one thing that totally killed any potential for Navi24 on my machine, aside from the ridiculous price, was it's lack of AV1 decode. Not only that, it doesn't feature any kind of video encode, and barely has any decoders at all, relegating most of the work to the CPU.
    I'd say it's all consequences of Navi 24 being a laptop-focused die. Hopefully AMD doesn't repeat these mistakes. I hear Navi 44 has a missing AV1 encoding feature, but not the whole thing.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Yeah, I can live with not having AV1 encode, but decode is quickly becoming ever more relevant in 2025 and beyond.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    usertests said:
    I'd say it's all consequences of Navi 24 being a laptop-focused die. Hopefully AMD doesn't repeat these mistakes. I hear Navi 44 has a missing AV1 encoding feature, but not the whole thing.
    Pretty much, why include these extra things that take up space on the die if they're already on the rest of the laptop. Why worry about more than 4x pcie 4 if you've got a direct pipe to the cpu with it. Why worry about more than 2 monitor outputs if you'll only ever be driving more than the built in lcd, and maybe one more monitor, the cpu's IGP can pickup the overhead if theres more. Why worry about missing av features if they are built into every cpu igp that this GPU will be paired with in a laptop. I get why its so gimped, but it definitely makes for a pretty sub par experience if you don't have a system thats capable of making up for its shortcomings.
    Reply
  • usertests
    artk2219 said:
    Pretty much, why include these extra things that take up space on the die if they're already on the rest of the laptop.
    The industry has rejected AMD mobile dGPUs so thoroughly that maybe it's time for AMD to pull out of it and focus on pumping out more iGPUs (including Strix/Medusa Halo which don't require an Nvidia dGPU). Or make no compromised laptop dGPU dies ever again but offer the Navi 44 equivalent packaged for mobile if there is some demand for it. We haven't seen RDNA4 in mobile, and I don't think there are any plans to make it happen.

    It's so bad that dGPU packages meant for mobile end up in Chinese eGPUs instead (like OneXGPU 2).
    Reply