RX 9070 GRE pre-orders go live in China — May 8 retail, $575 MSRP, and 6% faster than the RX 7900 GRE

AMD RDNA 4 and Radeon RX 9000-series GPUs
(Image credit: AMD)

Like Bethesda's Oblivion Remastered, it looks like we're getting another shadow drop this month, this time from AMD. Pre-orders for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE are now live at major e-commerce retailers in China, with deliveries expected to begin on May 8. Adding the 'officially confirmed' stamp to this news, the product page for the RX 9070 GRE has gone live on AMD's website, detailing all the specifications.

The RX 9070 GRE has been generating buzz in the news since early April. Consistent with AMD's past GRE releases, it was almost confirmed that the RX 9070 GRE would be region locked to China, at least initially. While the RX 7900 GRE set a precedent for later global launches, that was largely to rival Nvidia's RTX 4070 Super. The RX 9070 GRE sits between the RX 9070 and the yet-to-launch RX 9060 XT. That's what we would naturally assume; however, a price almost identical to the faster RX 9070 hints AMD might be replacing the latter with the GRE, at least in China.

In terms of specifications, the RX 9070 GRE wields 48 Compute Units, for a total of 3,072 Stream Processors, 25% fewer than the RX 9070 XT. It likely sticks to the same Navi 48 core as seen in the RX 9070 series, along with a 192-bit interface for 12GB of 18 Gbps GDDR6 VRAM. The boost clocks are up there at 2.79 GHz, right between the RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT. The GPU has a 220W TGP, matching RX 9070, and AMD recommends a 650W PSU for it. Most models should be powered by 2x 8-pin connectors, and some AIBs might even carry over existing RX 9070 board designs due to the similar power specifications.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Specification

RX 9070 GRE

RX 9070

RX 9070 XT

RX 7900 GRE

Architecture

RDNA 4

RDNA 4

RDNA 4

RDNA 3

Compute Units (CUs)

48

56

64

80

Stream Processors

3,072

3,584

4,096

5,120

Game Clock

2.22 GHz

2.07 GHz

2.40 GHz

1.29 GHz

Boost Clock

2.79 GHz

2.52 GHz

2.97 GHz

2.25 GHz

Memory

12GB GDDR6

16GB GDDR6

16GB GDDR6

16GB GDDR6

Memory Bus

192-bit

256-bit

256-bit

256-bit

Memory Speed

18 Gbps

20 Gbps

20 Gbps

18 Gbps

Memory Bandwidth

432 GB/s

640 GB/s

640 GB/s

576 GB/s

TDP (approx.)

220W

220W

304W

260W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

2x 8-pin

2x/3x 8-pin

2x 8-pin

Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

PCIe 5.0 x16

PCIe 5.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x16

Launch Price (China)

4,199 RMB ($575)

4,499 RMB ($600) / $549 Global

4,999 RMB ($685) / $599 USD (Global)

5,299 RMB ($700) at launch in China / $549 USD (Global)

The slower GDDR6 modules and narrower 192-bit interface chop the memory bandwidth by 32.5% compared to the rest of the lineup. Depending on how RDNA 4 scales with bandwidth, this might slightly impact performance. As seen before, there's a decent chance you can extract some gains by overclocking the memory, but let's wait for official tests.

AMD, through its first-party metrics, is claiming 6% better performance than the RX 7900 GRE on average across a set of 30 games at 1440p Ultra. That's a lot better than what we initially predicted, and underlines RDNA 4's per Compute Unit improvements in rasterization. But we'll need to see third-party/independent reviews before jumping to conclusions.

AIBs are commanding anywhere between 4,199 RMB ($575) to 4,499 RMB ($620), so we'll assume the former as AMD's recommended MSRP. Without China's general 13% VAT, the price comes down to roughly $500. While this might seem high at first glance, the RX 7900 GRE also launched at 5,299 RMB ($700) in China, followed later by a $549 global release.

It's possible that either the GRE is replacing the standard RX 9070 in China, or local prices for the GRE will drop gradually. Only time will tell, but we're currently awaiting reviews from Chinese enthusiasts and hoping a handful of these cards slip onto U.S. shores.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • wcbhkids
    25% fewer computer units but only 5% cheaper than the 9070XT?
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    AMD, through its first-party metrics, is claiming 6% better performance than the RX 7900 GRE on average across a set of 30 games at 1440p Ultra
    6%. Is this nVidia or what!? At least the RT performance will be substantially better.
    Reply
  • GenericUser2001
    wcbhkids said:
    25% fewer computer units but only 5% cheaper than the 9070XT?
    That price is being converted from the Chinese price, which includes the Chinese VAT; 9070XTs in China also include VAT, so there is a larger price gap in that market.
    Reply
  • GenericUser2001
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    6%. Is this nVidia or what!? At least the RT performance will be substantially better.
    The 7900 GRE launched at 5299 RMB in China; this card is launching at 4199 RMB. So basically same performance raster, better RT, and a price tier lower.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    GenericUser2001 said:
    The 7900 GRE launched at 5299 RMB in China; this card is launching at 4199 RMB. So basically same performance raster, better RT, and a price tier lower.
    Thanks! I already got that!
    Reply
  • usertests
    This is all about China. There should be no complaints until such time they decide to take the launch global and come up with a $USD MSRP. As far as we're concerned, there is no card between the 9060 XT 16 GB and 9070 16 GB.
    Reply
  • Pemalite
    Honestly, this would hit the budget just perfectly for me. AMD needs to drop it world wide.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Pemalite said:
    Honestly, this would hit the budget just perfectly for me. AMD needs to drop it world wide.
    They probably will when they have enough stock, but given that these are made from defective die's, we may be waiting a little while. Then whatever the stock is released it will disappear, just like the 7900 GRE did. RDNA 4 really did bring some excellent performance and efficiency gains though, 48 CU's outperforming 80 while using less power and clocking 30% higher.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    6%. Is this nVidia or what!? At least the RT performance will be substantially better.
    AMD released duds before, it's not just Nvidia. The 7800XT was no better than the 6800XT, sometimes worse. Look here for example:

    https://www.hardwaredealz.com/produktvergleich/amd-radeon-rx-7800-xt-16gb-vs-amd-radeon-rx-6800-xt-16gb
    The difference is literally even less than this time around, lmao.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    KyaraM said:
    AMD released duds before, it's not just Nvidia. The 7800XT was no better than the 6800XT, sometimes worse. Look here for example:

    https://www.hardwaredealz.com/produktvergleich/amd-radeon-rx-7800-xt-16gb-vs-amd-radeon-rx-6800-xt-16gb
    The difference is literally even less than this time around, lmao.
    👍

    My only point, was that a 6% leap in raster is very low considering its the newer RDNA.

    I'm not talking about price or anything else.

    That's true for the 7800xt as you mentioned.
    Reply