Intel axes thousands of technicians and engineers in sweeping U.S. layoffs — cutting 4,000 positions in the U.S., 2,392 in Oregon

Intel's headquarters in Santa Clara, Calif.
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel this month officially began to cut down its workforce in the U.S. and other countries, thus revealing actual numbers of positions to be cut. The Oregonian reports that the company will cut as many as 2,392 positions in Oregon and around 4,000 positions across its American operations, including Arizona, California, and Texas.

To put the 2,392 number into context, Intel is the largest employer in Oregon with around 20,000 of workers there. 2,392 is around 12% of the workforce, which is a lower end of layoff expectations, yet 2,400 is still a lot of people. The Oregon reduction rose sharply from an initial count of around 500 to a revised figure of 2,392, making it one of the largest layoffs in the state’s history. Intel began reducing staff earlier in the week but confirmed the larger number by Friday evening through a filing with Oregon state authorities.

Intel's Oregon operations have already seen 3,000 jobs lost over the past year through earlier buyouts and dismissals. This time around, Intel does not offer voluntarily retirement or buyouts, it indeed lays off personnel in Aloha (192) and Hillsboro (2,200).

Although Intel officially says that it is trying to get rid of mid-level managers to flatten the organization and focus on engineers, the list of positions that Intel is cutting is led by module equipment technicians (325), module development engineers (302), module engineers (126), and process integration development engineers (88). In fact, based on the Oregon WARN filing, a total of 190 employees with 'Manager' in their job titles (8% of personnel being laid off) were included among those laid off by Intel. These comprised various software, hardware, and operational management roles across the affected sites.

Earlier this month, it was reported that Intel began to cut-down its workforce in Israel. Those affected included mid-level managers (e.g., team leaders), first-line supervisors, and technicians from the Remote Operations Center (ROC). According to a media report, the supervisors oversee shift operations and sit one or two tiers above production workers, so their roles are phased out as part of the company's intention to flatten the organization. Intel is also laying off ROC technicians, who remotely monitor and control fab tools, manage workflows, and detect issues. Their roles are being automated as part of a global move to cut manual oversight in chip production. It is reasonable to assume that something similar is happening in the U.S.

Interestingly, Intel is implementing a new approach to workforce reductions, allowing individual departments to decide how to meet financial goals rather than announcing large, centralized cuts. This decentralized process has led to ongoing job losses across the company, with marketing functions being outsourced to Accenture and the automotive division completely shut down.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • ekio
    All these years of abusing their dominant position to keep selling at maximum price while doing zero RnD to improve their products for a long term healthy vision that cost a lot to their employees now….

    Lesson 101 of how total greediness leads to a big screw up.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Fabs are the new West Virginia coal mines.

    AI data centers will be next.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    ekio said:
    All these years of abusing their dominant position to keep selling at maximum price while doing zero RnD to improve their products for a long term healthy vision that cost a lot to their employees now….

    Lesson 101 of how total greediness leads to a big screw up.
    You have that all backwards.
    Reply
  • Stomx
    ekio said:
    All these years of abusing their dominant position to keep selling at maximum price while doing zero RnD to improve their products for a long term healthy vision that cost a lot to their employees now….

    Lesson 101 of how total greediness leads to a big screw up.
    Exactly. Let's just compare INTEL to TSMC for example: "TSMC has maintained a stable employment policy over the past decade, with rare instances of firing employees, even for underperformance. The company is known for valuing employee experience and expertise, and layoffs or terminations are not part of its corporate culture, especially at its headquarters.
    Instead, TSMC has focused on growth and expansion, which includes hiring and offering raises to workers, even in situations where union negotiations or performance issues arise..."
    Reply
  • acadia11
    ekio said:
    All these years of abusing their dominant position to keep selling at maximum price while doing zero RnD to improve their products for a long term healthy vision that cost a lot to their employees now….

    Lesson 101 of how total greediness leads to a big screw up.
    Don’t think it was greed but lack of vision. An inability to adapt and failure to separate foundry from retail business. Especially in a diversified IC ecosystem and shrinking x86 hegemony. Complacency rather than greed. It happens look at IBM and others … it’s hard to stay at the top.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    acadia11 said:
    Don’t think it was greed but lack of vision. An inability to adapt and failure to separate foundry from retail business. Especially in a diversified IC ecosystem and shrinking x86 hegemony. Complacency rather than greed. It happens look at IBM and others … it’s hard to stay at the top.
    That and it is hard to predict the future then mold your business to it. Sometimes things just won't work. Like Windows not wanting to do x86 phones, or people not wanting Optane. But not being able to keep up with the combination of TSMC and their customers without adequate investments should have been foreseeable.
    Reply
  • phead128
    Intel will be a great business school case study on how to blow a leading position by hiring a bean counter, stock buybacks, relying on anticompetitive techniques against AMD and xenophobia against Taiwan in order to suppress competition, but do zero innovation at the same time. Intel is proof that no amount of free taxpayer money can save ingrained leadership incompetence.
    Reply
  • Mr Majestyk
    Always the engineers in the firing line while the useless upper management continue to thrive and get obscene paychecks while running the company into the ground. Tan has already proven to be a bad choice and a liar. This is the same clown that railed against Gelsinger sacking engineers not middle-management.

    Sack the entire board and CEO!
    Reply
  • derekullo
    abufrejoval said:
    Fabs are the new West Virginia coal mines.

    AI data centers will be next.
    Intel's fabs are the new West Virginia coal mines.
    TSMC's fabs are doing just fine!
    Reply
  • tamalero
    acadia11 said:
    Don’t think it was greed but lack of vision. An inability to adapt and failure to separate foundry from retail business. Especially in a diversified IC ecosystem and shrinking x86 hegemony. Complacency rather than greed. It happens look at IBM and others … it’s hard to stay at the top.
    really guys?
    trying to milk a single process and stagnating advancement for almost a decade is "lack of vision"?
    They outright tried to ride the wave their best they could.
    That is GREED.
    Reply