Nvidia's GeForce RTX 5070 at $549 — How does it stack up to the previous generation RTX 4070?

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 announcement
(Image credit: Nvidia)

Nvidia made a big splash with the official announcement of its upcoming GeForce RTX 50-series Blackwell GPUs during the CES 2025 keynote. And while the halo RTX 5090 certainly looks like an absolute monster, for a lot of people, it's the mainstream (-ish) RTX 5070 at $549 that will be the star of the show. The RTX 4070 has been one of the best graphics cards since it launched, and now its replacement is on the way.

Nvidia claims the 5070 will offer "RTX 4090" levels of performance, at about one third the price and a bit over half the power. But how do they really stack up, and how does the 5070 compare to the existing RTX 4070? Let's find out, and we've filled in a few bits and pieces with best guess estimates for now, but most of the specifications are correct.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Graphics Card RTX 5070 RTX 4090 RTX 4070
Architecture GB205 AD102 AD104
Process Node TSMC 4NP TSMC 4N TSMC 4N
Transistors (Billion) ? 76.3 32
Die size (mm^2) ? 608.4 294.5
SMs 48 128 46
GPU Shaders 6144 16384 5888
Tensor Cores 192 512 184
RT Cores 48 128 46
Boost Clock (MHz) 2512 2520 2475
VRAM Speed (Gbps) 28 21 21
VRAM (GB) 12 24 12
VRAM Bus Width 192 384 192
L2 Cache 48? 72 36
Render Output Units 64? 176 64
Texture Mapping Units 192 512 184
TFLOPS FP32 (Boost) 30.9 82.6 29.1
TFLOPS FP16 (INT8 TOPS) 494 (988) 661 (1321) 233 (466)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 672 1008 504
TBP (watts) 250 450 200
Launch Date Feb 2025? Oct 2022 Apr 2023
Launch Price $549 $1,599 $599
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • TheyStoppedit
    Be very careful when comparing RTX 50 to 40. RTX 40 doesn't have DLSS 4. I wanna see a true, genuine, 1 to 1, apples to apples, side by side comparison, both on the exact same hardware, both with DLSS turned off, both running the exact same race, and see what happens.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    TheyStoppedit said:
    Be very careful when comparing RTX 50 to 40. RTX 40 doesn't have DLSS 4. I wanna see a true, genuine, 1 to 1, apples to apples, side by side comparison, both on the exact same hardware, both with DLSS turned off, both running the exact same race, and see what happens.
    It’ll be a little faster than a 4070 that’s what’ll happen. No need to wait and see.

    They make excellent GPUs but no way they’re getting that much more raw performance out of so much less hardware in one generation.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    TheyStoppedit said:
    Be very careful when comparing RTX 50 to 40. RTX 40 doesn't have DLSS 4. I wanna see a true, genuine, 1 to 1, apples to apples, side by side comparison, both on the exact same hardware, both with DLSS turned off, both running the exact same race, and see what happens.
    That may never come to pass. It seems to me that the 50 has further dedicated tech intended to utilize DLSS better. It wouldn't be fair if that tech was not allowed to operate. It's becoming a murky situation, where these cards may be depending a whole lot on AI driven processing on top of straight instruction. I fear that in addition to nerfing hardware on lower models, the software could potentially be heavily modulated to weaken or strengthen cards in the lineup.
    Reply
  • atomicWAR
    Gururu said:
    That may never come to pass. It seems to me that the 50 has further dedicated tech intended to utilize DLSS better. It wouldn't be fair if that tech was not allowed to operate. It's becoming a murky situation, where these cards may be depending a whole lot on AI driven processing on top of straight instruction. I fear that in addition to nerfing hardware on lower models, the software could potentially be heavily modulated to weaken or strengthen cards in the lineup.
    While I agree on things getting murky... Even now in reviews it is pretty standard to have testing done with and without DLSS/frame gen running so people can see all 3+ sets of numbers. I know gamers who refuse to use frame gen or dlss, swearing it feels laggy. And some who won't touch DLSS for visual preference preferring instead to only game at native resolutions. Personally I don't tend to notice dlss/frame gen lag in most scenarios but a there are few I pick up on it slightly so its fair to request benchmarks without the tech enabled and I don't see that changing anytime soon.
    Reply
  • TheyStoppedit
    VizzieTheViz said:
    It’ll be a little faster than a 4070 that’s what’ll happen. No need to wait and see.

    They make excellent GPUs but no way they’re getting that much more raw performance out of so much less hardware in one generation.
    That's kinda the point. NVidia is basically lying. In a real apples to apples test, the 5070 will not beat the 4090. The 5080 might. Imagine I come out with a test.... A 1050Ti vs a 5090.... and say my 1050Ti achieved a higher FPS than the 5090.

    The 5090 test: Avatar
    The 1050Ti test: Terraria

    "My 1050Ti got a higher framerate than your 5090"

    It's basically lying, which is exactly what NVidia did when they said 5070 performance of a 4090. Imagine someone does that on a game that has no DLSS support at all and then the real results come out and they call false advertising. I get that it's marketing for NVidia, but really, it's lying. Put DLSS 4 on the 4090 and see how the 5070 does. Make it a true, 1 to 1 , side by side, apples to apples test. All software and hardware the same. Let's keep it fair and honest, come on now lol
    Reply
  • thestryker
    5070 is using 28Gbps memory per MSI and the nvidia spec page shows 672 GB/s memory bandwidth which confirms that.

    This is the sort of official nonsense slide they're sharing right now (slide from Wccftech):
    https://i.imgur.com/MQLoVmi.jpegThe closest to real world performance there is Far Cry 6 and it also has RT enabled. The indication is that 50 series RT is superior to the 40 series and that looks to be somewhere around 30% improvement. The ones with big improvements are due to the new frame generation.

    I'm sure these cards will be an improvement across the board, but I'm sick and tired of companies flagrantly misrepresenting their products.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    VizzieTheViz said:
    It’ll be a little faster than a 4070 that’s what’ll happen. No need to wait and see.

    They make excellent GPUs but no way they’re getting that much more raw performance out of so much less hardware in one generation.
    The 4070Ti is genuinely at a similar gaming performance level as the 3090/Ti, though. Yes, without DLSS or Frame Generation. So it absolutely is possible for the 5070 to be more than "slightly faster" than the 4070, even beat the 4080. Will it beat the 4090? Who knows. Time will tell I guess.
    Reply
  • VindicatorDX
    The multi-frame-generation does NOT generate frames in between two processed frames! Instead, it generates them after ONE. So don’t expect latency from this tech! This is a very different approach than the 40 series frame generation! So if you can hit 120fps, this will let you hit an astronomical 480fps. Will the generated frames look good though? That’s what we’ll have to wait and find out about.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    atomicWAR said:
    While I agree on things getting murky... Even now in reviews it is pretty standard to have testing done with and without DLSS/frame gen running so people can see all 3+ sets of numbers. I know gamers who refuse to use frame gen or dlss, swearing it feels laggy. And some who won't touch DLSS for visual preference preferring instead to only game at native resolutions. Personally I don't tend to notice dlss/frame gen lag in most scenarios but a there are few I pick up on it slightly so its fair to request benchmarks without the tech enabled and I don't see that changing anytime soon.
    Yes, but now nVidia is telling us its all DLSS or nothing. They put all of their chips into it in this card generation. Probably forever since they are handing the ball to "AI". It's the result that counts I guess, no matter how you got there. If an electric car can beat a petrol car in a race, it doesn't matter that it worked a fraction as hard.
    Reply
  • BenWVU
    TheyStoppedit said:
    Be very careful when comparing RTX 50 to 40. RTX 40 doesn't have DLSS 4. I wanna see a true, genuine, 1 to 1, apples to apples, side by side comparison, both on the exact same hardware, both with DLSS turned off, both running the exact same race, and see what happens.
    It looks like we might have an apples to apples comparison in the Nvidia charts, but only with A Plague Tale. The note says that game only supports DLSS 3, so I presume that means that both cards are running that game with DLSS 3 only. In that case, it looks like the 50 series is about 30% better than the 40 series.

    Other than that, I agree. I don't really care about MFG until I've tried it to see how the latency feels. I'm not a fan of FG.
    Reply