Intel allegedly planning more Oregon layoffs — new report says retreating operation could become a liability to the state

Intel Fab
(Image credit: Intel)

In the wake of recent layoffs, the Intel Oregon workforce is down to its lowest point in more than a decade, reports Oregon Live / The Oregonian. Worryingly, the newspaper’s sources have indicated that this isn’t the end for Intel's Oregon job cuts. Moreover, cuts as deep as this do not just affect Intel and its newly redundant staff; the Oregonian highlights the fact that the well-paid roles “helped buoy the whole state,” thanks to tax receipts and other factors.

Intel has a long and illustrious history in Oregon, but its inexorable growth now seems to have done more than just stall. This change in fortunes will be especially painful to the lives and plans of employees. Only a year ago, they would have been hearing and reading reports about a massive expansion in Oregon, with thousands more jobs.

With cuts of “at least 5,400 Oregon jobs since August,” according to the source, there are now 18,000 employees left in Oregon. Despite this massive cut in jobs, “Oregon will continue to play a critical role in Intel’s global operations, serving as the epicenter of our cutting-edge semiconductor research, technology development, and manufacturing,” Intel reportedly said in a statement on Monday.

Lip-Bu Tan’s "simple math" knows no mercy

Back in April, we first heard reports of recently installed CEO Lip-Bu Tan getting ready to swing his axe to cull 20% of the workforce for cost and efficiency savings. Sadly for Intel employees, they’d already faced a reduction of approximately. 15,000 positions last August.

In the new Oregonian report on job cuts, Tan is quoted as explaining his severe personnel pruning activity as “simple math.” Talking to employees, he noted that the combined ranks of Nvidia and TSMC had only a slightly higher headcount than Intel alone. However, both those rivals are far more profitable.

Impacts beyond Intel's campus

The Oregonian notes that the state is “heavily reliant on personal income taxes” to fund improved schools, public safety, and various other services available to state residents. Oregon actually modified the tax code to favor Intel’s business, to retain and attract increased investment. That seems to have paid off, until now.

With the swing in Intel's fortunes and employee tax receipts impacted, local officials are worried about Intel shifting from being an asset to a liability. However, these concerns may be unfounded. From the material shared in the report, 15,000 well-paid Intel employees still remain in the state. Moreover, there are hopes that many ex-employees will stay to boost economic prosperity in Oregon, perhaps investing in new projects and startups.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • dalek1234
    First you trim the fat, then the muscle, and lastly the bone. Which stage is Intel at? They might have invented a new stage. Trimming The Brain
    Reply
  • magbarn
    dalek1234 said:
    First you trim the fat, then the muscle, and lastly the bone. Which stage is Intel at? They might have invented a new stage. Trimming The Brain
    That's been going on for awhile already. Intel is dead man walking. Has the stench of other industry has beens that are either dead or shadows of their former selves like DEC, IBM, and SGI. Only government provided life support is going to keep them around.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    Whilst we have to put up with throwaway remarks sometimes, the harsh reality is that Intel employees will lose their jobs. The local economy will suffer majorly, as will secondary jobs for the other things Intel need doing on site. It's quite sad IMO. Those being sacked aren't the ones that have caused this situation for Intel. Yet, they have no say in how things will pan out. Low hanging fruit and all that. I'd be plenty p***ed with where this going.

    I fear these won't be the last cuts either. There is more pain on the way.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Intel needs to stay afloat. The sins of the past are baring their fangs and people suffer. The company removed its brain when they ousted the engineer for a bean counter, and like the bean counters before Gelsinger, may bring the company to ruin. Brian Krzanich and Bob Swan were the beginning of the troubles for Intel which led to the problems of today. Lets hope the new bean counter knows what they are doing.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    Well…. Intel will continue to fail as long they continue to empower the bean counters over the engineers.
    Reply
  • mikeebb
    Intel sort of got used to being the go-to for everything, but that model died a long time ago. What we see now is the long tail of that, though with a money guy leading the cleanup it's like to be poorly focused and cause further fundamental damage. The main issue, as I see it (horrible pun alert), is lack of focus.

    The competitors mentioned in the article have focus: nVidia on ultimate performance for the *coin AI folks (nearly unlimited markets right now, that they have an spend a lot of money on maintaining a lead in) and spillover from that for monied hobbiests. They dabble, at best, in general-use markets, and are mostly fabless. TSMC is the best at what they do: produce chips; they are very focused on that market, and even Intel has used their services at times.

    What is Intel focused on? Endless minor iterations (and sometimes actual improvements) on x86? Also-ran graphics products and experimenter-level AI stuff? The former has been their bread-and-butter for so many years that the other stuff is just in the back of the bus riding along from my view looking at Tom's and other publications. Not sure a Money Guy will fix that, but you need a Money Guy to clear out the closets sometimes; as long as there is some engineering left when they're done, appropriate for a market they can be competitive in, if not dominate, with the remaining resources. No matter what, though, Intel will be a shadow of its former self in the near future, hopefully refocused on modern markets and making money on what's left. If they can't do that, we'll probably see a breakup or liquidation in the not-very-long-term. Unfortunately, that'll probably result in handing the general CPU business, or what's left of it, to AMD and Qualcomm.

    I see Micron as a sort of example. Their business is memory, pure and simple. They operate on a way smaller scale than the other Big Names in the memory business (which are also, usually, smallish divisions of much bigger companies - with access to resources Micron doesn't). They *should* have seen China et al eat their lunch. Somehow, they didn't. They just have generally better product than the others, at a slightly but not much higher price. Quality and superior product, at the right (not the cheapest) price, can sell. How can Intel execute that kind of move?
    Reply
  • joeer77
    Sold my Intel stock this week. Bought AMD. Still made 22% since last August.

    In Oregon we pay 9% income tax. When Intel dies, Oregon dies and she is already dying. Especially in Portland.

    Nike is not enough tax revenue to fund the state. Logging and fishing industry is not enough either. The NVIDIA and Amazon data centers gobbling up the land in Hillsboro will not bring in enough tax revenue to matter.

    Get it together Intel. Take some EUV risks. Get your yield up.
    Reply
  • helper800
    joeer77 said:
    Sold my Intel stock this week. Bought AMD. Still made 22% since last August.

    In Oregon we pay 9% income tax. When Intel dies, Oregon dies and she is already dying. Especially in Portland.

    Nike is not enough tax revenue to fund the state. Logging and fishing industry is not enough either. The NVIDIA and Amazon data centers gobbling up the land in Hillsboro will not bring in enough tax revenue to matter.

    Get it together Intel. Take some EUV risks. Get your yield up.
    Did you get the long term investment tax reduction? Seems like if you kept the stock until August this year you would have paid less capital gains on the 22% profit.
    Reply
  • redgarl
    helper800 said:
    Did you get the long term investment tax reduction? Seems like if you kept the stock until August this year you would have paid less capital gains on the 22% profit.
    Not if it is in a registered account. You need to have a lot of Assets for someone in the middleclass to really invest in stocks outside of ROTH IRA and 401k.
    Reply
  • redgarl
    Intel is right now in a dead spiral.

    They cannot maintain their business model because they don't make enough revenue because of strong competition.

    If they cannot achieve it with the actual workforce, imagine what they are going to face with a smaller workforce...

    Intel will lose more and more momentum to try to maintain a business model that will generate even less revenue and will prevent them for any kind of leadership in the market.
    Reply