Intel's rumored 'Nova Lake-AX' allegedly packs insane specs but might never launch — reportedly featured 28 CPU cores, 48 Xe3 GPU cores, and an upgraded 256-bit memory bus to counter AMD Strix Halo

Intel Arrow Lake
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel’s lack of a proper answer to AMD’s Strix Halo—and by extension, Apple’s M-series—has left a clear gap in the high-end APU space. The Blue Team hasn’t seriously competed in the graphics-focused mobile market for a while, but that might be about to change. Just yesterday, “Nova Lake-AX” leaked as a potential return to form, marking what could be Intel’s most capable mobile chip to date; just the ace needed to stir up the market again. Now, we have a full spec breakdown, and it paints a very different picture of what’s coming.

The details come courtesy of leaker Raichu in a now-deleted tweet, a reliable name in the Intel rumor mill. According to him, Nova Lake-AX features a massive 28-core CPU layout on a single compute tile, instead of the two we're expecting on the upcoming Nova Lake-S desktop lineup. It's comprised of 8 P-Cores, 16 E-Cores, and 4 LP-Cores, likely based on the rumored Coyote Cove and Arctic Wolf architectures. Similar to Lunar Lake, these cores will lack hyperthreading in order to gain some efficiency. Still, Intel appears to be targeting hybrid compute performance at a scale we haven’t seen from its mobile segment before. Yet, the CPU isn't even the most interesting bit—that designation would go to the GPU.

Intel's Nova Lake-AX rumored specs

(Image credit: Raichu on X)

Nova Lake-AX is rumored to feature 384 Execution Units—equivalent to 48 Xe-Cores, assuming an 8-unit-per-core setup like Xe2—based on Intel’s upcoming Xe3 architecture. That’s more than double the core count of Intel’s own Arc B580 desktop GPU, which has 20. This would mark a massive leap over Meteor Lake and Lunar Lake, and possibly even surpass AMD’s Strix Halo, which peaks at 40 RDNA 3.5 Compute Units. For further context, Apple’s M4 Pro has up to 20 GPU cores, while Lunar Lake tops out at just 64 EUs. If accurate, Nova Lake-AX could offer the highest iGPU compute density ever seen in an x86 chip.

That kind of GPU horsepower demands serious bandwidth, and Intel seems ready. Nova Lake-AX is rumored to support LPDDR5X memory at speeds up to 9,600 MT/s, possibly even 10,667 MT/s, across a wide 256-bit bus. That would both match and exceed AMD’s Strix Halo, which also uses a 256-bit interface but tops out at only 8000 MT/s. Apple’s M-series chips use unified memory up to 8,533 MT/s in the M4 Max, though the narrower bus limits their actual throughput. Nvidia’s upcoming N1 SoC, which also targets the hybrid APU segment with a custom Grace CPU and Blackwell GPU cores, remains largely under wraps, but it will likely feature even faster memory.

All that being said, despite the impressive specs, Nova Lake-AX may never even launch. The tipster Raichu notes that the design is currently “paused,” and earlier leaks suggest it was sidelined internally as Intel restructured its client roadmap. This makes it unclear whether the project will be revived or permanently scrapped. Even so, the fact that such a spec sheet exists—and was developed far enough to leak—shows Intel was seriously exploring a high-performance APU to rival AMD’s and Apple’s best.

That’s important because the market is shifting. AMD has significantly upped its game and dominates the high-end APU space with Strix Halo, at least on the Windows side. Apple’s M-series SoCs continue to lead on performance-per-watt and have become increasingly competitive in raw power. Even Nvidia will soon be gunning for the same territory. If Intel wants to remain relevant in this segment, a chip like Nova Lake-AX—whether it launches or not—might need to go from rumor to roadmap again.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • Penzi
    Oh man! Vapourware always has the best specs!
    Reply
  • usertests
    That kind of GPU horsepower demands serious bandwidth, and Intel seems ready. Nova Lake-AX is rumored to support LPDDR5X memory at speeds up to 9,600 MT/s, possibly even 10,667 MT/s, across a wide 256-bit bus. That would both match only match and exceed AMD’s Strix Halo, which also uses a 256-bit interface but tops out at only 8000 MT/s. Apple’s M-series chips use unified memory up to 8,533 MT/s in the M4 Max, though the narrower bus limits their actual throughput.
    Even if it's not cancelled or "paused", they may end up competing with LPDDR6 devices that make 10,000 MT/s less impressive.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    I wonder if the Strix Halo itself actually has a proper market, I'm not seeing it storming the shelves or the top selling ranks anywhere.

    And IMHO the main problem is price.

    Strix Halo should be cheaper than a normal CPU + dGPU combination, for what it delivers to normal consumers in productivity and gaming and the BOM bill of devices based on it.

    Yet the market is still filled with last generation hardware that sports say a Zen 8 core APU with an RTX 4060 at far below €1000. And that delivers better gaming, while it lasts long enough at 2D desktop work on battery to let single laptop owners survive outside their office, home or dorm.

    I know it's technically very different, but who's ready to pay for a difference that doesn't provide practical value to the vast majority of the market?

    Notebook entry level LLM inferencing isn't a mass market, if it's anything but marketing hallucinating itself, or letting LLMs do it for them. Especially if you ask HBM prices for getting 128GB of LPDDR5 soldered in.

    And paying in excess of €3000 for RTX 5050 performance on a desktop?

    AMD is trying to grab market share from Apple, I guess, using what is basically a console design... without a console using it to pay for the scale to make it cheap.

    But Strix Halo doesn't seem to deliver 24H on a single charge nor does it deliver on whatever Fruity Cult fans look for when they buy a top end Mx laptop.

    Strix Halo is designed to be cheaper than that CPU + dGPU combo, lowering component count and using commodity DRAM, but they aren't selling it that way.

    That low value tiny niche market doesn't get any bigger by Intel trying to catch up: they'd be stupid to try for halo, given their current state. AMD could lower the price towards their production cost, which in Intel's case would be far higher, whether they use their own fabs or not, again for lack of scale.

    It's not surprising me at all that Strix Halo is already seeping into the Aliexpress superNUCs market, where it might sell like wildfire, once the prices come into range, perhaps only because AMD has its successors pushing out of the fabs and they do have surplus.

    So why is AMD not selling Strix Halo nearer to production cost already?

    I got plenty of speculations, very few insights.
    Reply
  • FunSurfer
    Where is the article of the rumored AMD's insane Zen 6 specs: 12 core CCD, 24 cores, 48 threads, 48mb cache per CCD, 7ghz core speed?
    I want to comment "AMD's Sandy Bridge moment".
    The Ryzen 7 12-core 10800X3D will boast at least 144mb cache, and so will the Ryzen 5 8-core 10600X3D.
    it will be interesting to see the effects of the cache boost from 96mb to 144mb (or even 192mb) to gaming performance. The cache amount didn't change from the 5800X3D.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    FunSurfer said:
    Where is the article of the rumored AMD's insane Zen 6 specs: 12 core CCD, 24 cores, 48 threads, 48mb cache per CCD, 7ghz core speed?
    I want to comment "AMD's Sandy Bridge moment".
    The Ryzen 7 12-core 10800X3D will boast at least 144mb cache, and so will the Ryzen 5 8-core 10600X3D.
    it will be interesting to see the effects of the cache boost from 96mb to 144mb (or even 192mb) to gaming performance. The cache amount didn't change from the 5800X3D.
    They seem to have the option of using 0-2 V-cache tiles per CCD and AMD is probably testing these combinations for EPYCs and desktop configurations right now.

    But without hands on or direct access to that data, you can just as well let some LLM generate you as many articles as you want for similar quality results.
    Reply
  • John Nemesh
    1) Intel has a LOT of heavy lifting to just CATCH UP to AMD in CPU performance. Nova Lake sounds great ON PAPER, but we won't know how the new architecture actually performs until it's released and we have real benchmarks.

    2) Intel will be forced to use TSMC if they want to compete at all, their own foundries are not up to the task.

    3) Even IF it's twice as fast as AMD (it won't be), I still wouldn't consider it, considering how they gaslit their customers over the failures that are continuing to happen with their Meteor Lake and Raptor Lake CPUs!

    They lost TRUST. They will have a very hard time earning it back.
    Reply
  • jg.millirem
    More Intel armpit-farting. What percentage of their plans do they stick to?
    Reply
  • heffeque
    abufrejoval said:
    I wonder if the Strix Halo itself actually has a proper market, I'm not seeing it storming the shelves or the top selling ranks anywhere.
    Do you mean the Strix Halo Framework Desktop that I've pre-ordered months ago (just a couple hours after it was presented) and hasn't shipped yet?
    The waiting list is large, but some brands prefer to wait a bit until drivers/bios/software are a bit less rough (and/or until AMD actually sends them the chips, you know how AMD does tons of paper-launches, especially on laptop hardware).
    Reply