The CPU Core Wars return — Intel Nova Lake leak teases monster 52 cores, DDR5-8000, and 32 PCIe lanes rumored, would rival AMD's finest

12th Gen Alder Lake
(Image credit: Intel)

Yesterday, it emerged that Intel's next-generation Core Ultra 9 'Nova Lake-S' processors for desktops will feature as many as 52 cores, which makes them quite formidable contenders both for gaming and for performance-demanding applications. It turns out that the whole Nova Lake-S platform will be quite beastly too, as it will support DDR5-8000 memory and will feature as many as 32 PCIe 5.0 lanes, according to Jaykihn, a blogger with an excellent reputation when it comes to Intel's plans.

Intel's range-topping Core Ultra 9 'Nova Lake-S' processors for desktop PCs are set to pack 16 high-performance Coyote Cove cores, 32 energy-efficient Arctic Wolf cores, and four low-power Arctic Wolf cores. Memory subsystem of the new CPU will feature two channels supporting up to one DDR5-8000 memory module per channel, though it is unclear whether Intel plans to support regular DDR5-8000 DIMMs, or DDR5-8000 CUDIMMs with a clock driver chip.

There is a small catch, though, as each pair of Nova Lake's high-performance cores will feature a shared 2MB L2 cache, according to HXL. Using shared L2 cache will affect the performance of Coyote Cove cores, though this is a necessary tradeoff to pack up to 52 cores into next-generation Core Ultra 9 and up to 42 cores into next-generation Core Ultra 7 CPUs, as well as double the number of high-performance cores in high-end CPUs. Hopefully, support for high-speed DDR5 memory will offset the smaller L2 cache, and the performance of Coyote Cove will not be lower than the performance of Lion Cove cores.

Furthermore, Intel's Nova Lake CPUs will feature 24 PCIe 5.0 lanes: x16 lanes for graphics cards (which can be bifurcated to two x8 or to four x4 lanes) as well as two x4 lanes for SSDs. In addition, the chipset will support eight PCIe 5.0 lanes and 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes for peripherals, which could enable rather monstrous systems with loads of storage and plenty of add-in cards and accelerators.

Intel's next-generation Core Ultra 'Nova Lake-S' processors for desktops will reportedly use the all-new LGA1954 packaging and a new socket, so those who want to have up to 52 cores will have to upgrade to a new platform.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • logainofhades
    And it will need its own mini reactor to run.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Or at least a bit more power than ARL.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    logainofhades said:
    And it will need its own mini reactor to run.
    Only if you overclock it which is the dumbest thing ever to do with a high core count CPU....so of course that's what every review is gonna do.

    Arrow lake is like twice as efficient as anything else at low power according to computerbase.de but nobody knows it because everybody puts the power draw to unlimited and runs a power virus to show high power numbers.
    https://i.imgur.com/00HJj5p.jpg
    Reply
  • Konomi
    But how likely is it that Intel can launch it without a major issue of some kind? Is the IMC going to crap itself after a few months of running at that DDR5 8000?
    Reply
  • SonoraTechnical
    Konomi said:
    But how likely is it that Intel can launch it without a major issue of some kind? Is the IMC going to crap itself after a few months of running at that DDR5 8000?
    Are there alt of instances of Integrated memory controllers failing due to high speed memory? Just asking, because I don't know the answer to that question.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    SonoraTechnical said:
    Are there alt of instances of Integrated memory controllers failing due to high speed memory? Just asking, because I don't know the answer to that question.
    It was one of the things suspected to be the cause of the 14th gen degradation, and ryzen also has many issues with not running all ram or stopping to boot after a while with fast ram.

    It's a justified concern to have at this point.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Hey anybody, what is Windows even *doing* with the various kinds of cores?
    Have they ever posted anything to explain this?
    Or is Intel just putting out hardware features that don't mean anything.

    Can I get something with just 8 or 4 performance cores and fewer "energy efficient" cores and larger cache per core/core-pair?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    TerryLaze said:
    Arrow lake is like twice as efficient as anything else at low power
    I wouldn't get an AMD chiplet-based Ryzen 7000 or 9000, if I really cared about power-efficiency. They both use the same, inefficient IO die. That's what's keeping them from scaling down well.

    I'd be really interested in seeing the same graph with a Ryzen AI Max 395 mini PC.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    JRStern said:
    Can I get something with just 8 or 4 performance cores and fewer "energy efficient" cores and larger cache per core/core-pair?
    People who have a LGA1700 and want a modest upgrade for it will have the option to drop in Bartlett Lake. It should have up to 12 Raptor Cove cores on a monolithic die. It should be like what Raptor Lake would've been, if it were P-only.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Also, I wanted to remind folks that Nova Lake will feature APX and AVX10. It also sounds like they'll just go ahead and let us have full AVX-512, too. So, some big ISA extensions on the way!

    This is the kind of upgrade I've been waiting for. Even so, I think one compute chiplet will be more than enough for my home needs.
    Reply