Intel's Xeon 7 'Diamond Rapids' to reportedly pack 192 cores, 16 memory channels, and 500 watts of power consumption

Intel Xeon 6 processor
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel's next-generation Xeon processor, codenamed Diamond Rapids, will reportedly utilize a new platform with a 9324-pin LGA socket, indicating a revised memory subsystem and PCIe lane configuration. But a leaked slide published on Sunday by X86 is dead&back reveals that the new CPU could feature up to 192 high-performance cores as well as eight or 16 DDR5 memory channels. Please note that we are dealing with information from an unofficial source, so please take it with a grain of salt.

Intel's rumored specs for the Xeon 7 'Diamond Rapids' processor include up to 192 cores, an eight-channel or 16-channel memory subsystem, and a thermal design power of 500W. We already know that Intel's Diamond Rapids processors will use 2nd Generation MRDIMM memory modules, which will support data transfer rates higher than 8800 MT/s supported by existing Xeon 6 'Granite Rapids.' If these next-generation processors support 12,800 MT/s memory modules, the entire memory subsystem of these CPUs would support a peak bandwidth of over 1.6 TB/s, representing a significant increase compared to existing designs (approximately 844 GB/s for Granite Rapids).

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • DS426
    Holy smokes that's a lot of memory bandwidth if true!

    AMD still isn't entertaining a 4-socket platform?
    Reply
  • kanewolf
    Hopefully, with that power envelope, they will also have a 32 core high clock version for HPC. 192 cores is good for virtualization and things like that, but typically the clock speeds are lower.
    Reply
  • Firestone
    Finally. It only took Intel ten years to make a real CPU. If you don't have at least 100 cores why bother
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    kanewolf said:
    Hopefully, with that power envelope, they will also have a 32 core high clock version for HPC. 192 cores is good for virtualization and things like that, but typically the clock speeds are lower.

    Turbo clocks will take care of that ... you need to look into 32 cores max turbo out of 192 cores..
    Reply
  • kanewolf
    newtechldtech said:
    Turbo clocks will take care of that ... you need to look into 32 cores max turbo out of 192 cores..
    IMO, no. HPC specific models are designed different than the many-core versions.
    Reply
  • Rob1C
    The air coolers by Dynatron go up to 660W for Intel and 600W for AMD.

    https://www.dynatron.co/product-page/c21
    https://www.dynatron.co/product-page/j25
    It's true that some of that could just be headroom, but liquid cooling would take us even further.

    We should be able to get more than just 32 cores at higher clocks, and an increased cache size for HPC.

    Instead of a race for the most cores it's looking like a race for the most pins, and who can break 10K first; which is great, since it means more PCIe lanes, faster CXL, increased memory bandwidth and interprocessor communication; unless everything collapses when optical comes in a few years.
    Reply