Trump administration reportedly mulls investing in Intel to bolster national security — direct cash assistance would speed Ohio fab build out
A lot of money is coming Intel's way?

The U.S. government is considering a plan to purchase a stake in Intel in a bid to speed up completion of the company's delayed semiconductor complex in Ohio, reports Bloomberg, citing sources familiar with the matter. If the plan comes to fruition, this could become a crucial instrument to put Intel in the foundry game with the right process technologies and enough capacity. The idea reportedly emerged after the meeting between President Donald Trump and Intel's chief executive, Lip-Bu Tan, earlier this week.
None of the parties has formally confirmed the plan, so take the information with a grain of salt.
The idea centers on providing Intel with additional financial support to advance its manufacturing site, once called Silicon Heartland in Ohio, which was once promoted as one of the largest chip production sites in the world, once it is fully built and equipped. Construction has been repeatedly postponed, and the latest timeline pushed mass production of chips in Ohio into the next decade.
Speeding up completion of the fab would be crucial for Intel's foundry initiative, which requires ample production capacity, as well as U.S. national security, as the company and its partners will be able to produce chips on its most advanced fabrication process domestically.
The campus was once expected to require investments of over $100 billion to fully realize its potential, though initial investments to build the first phase of the fab, along with utilities and an office building, are significantly lower and might be in the range of tens of billions. The amount of equity the government might acquire has not been specified, and the structure of the deal is still under discussion, according to people familiar with the talks cited by Bloomberg.
Although President Donald Trump heavily criticized Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act, which provided chipmakers with grants, buying a stake in Intel would not be the first time the Trump administration has entered into a direct business partnership with a private company. Recent examples include a 'golden share' in United States Steel Corp. to facilitate its sale to a Japanese buyer. Also, the Department of Defence recently acquired a $400 million preferred equity position in MP Materials, a major rare earth producer in America, and became its largest shareholder.
Officials are reportedly considering a model similar to the MP Materials arrangement, potentially combining government equity with guaranteed purchase agreements, loans, private investment, and formal public-sector collaboration. Such a package is designed to give investors confidence in the stability of the project while ensuring that taxpayer funds are tied to strategic outcomes.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
For Intel, the timing of the possible financial influx and the confidence of the U.S. government may be even more important than the money itself. On the one hand, the company needs to build up capacity for its own products and those of its outside customers. On the other hand, it needs to gain their trust by demonstrating both competitive process technologies and financial stability. The help of the U.S. administration will provide both, but Intel must ensure that its fabrication processes are ready for third-party chip designers, and its capacities meet their requirements.
Although the deal between Intel and the U.S. government is yet to be finalized (if there is a deal, of course), one of the outcomes of the talks between Donald Trump and Lip-Bu Tan is the signal that the White House is confident in Tan's leadership despite Trump's earlier calls for him to resign over concerns about his ties to Chinese business interest.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
joeer77 No no no! $37 trillion dollars in debt. We don't have money for this. Americans will not see one penny return on investment. No more corporate welfare. How many millions did Pat Gelsinger get when he was sent packing? How many millions is LBT getting now? I shouldn't have to fund these CEOs bad decisions.Reply -
thestryker This sort of investment makes sense if it's tied into firm requirements. Building additional fabs is important, but at the country level they're only important if Intel continues node advancement. Without node advancement it's effectively just an interest free cash injection for additional capacity.Reply
TSMC was built on the back of national investment and has continued to get beneficial treatment. Rapidus in Japan would be nowhere without the heavy government backing. This is the reality of bleeding edge manufacturing and if having home grown technology is important to the country it's necessary. -
Math Geek thestryker said:This sort of investment makes sense if it's tied into firm requirements. Building additional fabs is important, but at the country level they're only important if Intel continues node advancement. Without node advancement it's effectively just an interest free cash injection for additional capacity.
TSMC was built on the back of national investment and has continued to get beneficial treatment. Rapidus in Japan would be nowhere without the heavy government backing. This is the reality of bleeding edge manufacturing and if having home grown technology is important to the country it's necessary.
that's pretty much what i am thinking as well. another fab pumping out tired old tech really does not do anything. they let their RnD lapse and got complacent while AMD worked hard to innovate. now Intel is reaping the results of sitting on their thumbs for a decade. a million more power hungry inferior cpu's flooding the market is not going to change their situation.
the only thing i don't believe we'll ever know is whose fault that is. the CEO of course gets the blame but in the end we do know that the CEO is simply employed to milk as much cash as possible for the shareholders. most often to the detriment of the company itself. so it's possible the shareholders caused it since the money was flowing for a long time with little competition. they likely demanded the money rather than letting it be used for the long term benefit of the company.
but that's just my guess. -
Gururu Its the only U.S. owned fab in the country. This is a no brainer for a sitting president.Reply -
Notton
Uhh.... Texas Instruments? Micron?Gururu said:Its the only U.S. owned fab in the country. -
TechieTwo I feel that Intel has gotten way too much tax payer funding and delivered nothing of value. In fact they laid off thousands of employees weeks after receiving $8.5 Billion in U.S. funds. They are expected to get $11 Billion in loans also under the "Chips Act".Reply
Adapting the Chinese model of controlling corporate actions via partial company ownership isn't a good Biz model nor political strategy IMNHO. With Intel's history of FTC anti-trust violations there is no reason for tax payers to continue to fund Intel's failed Biz model. -
thestryker
They probably should have said advanced/leading edge because nobody else is in the same league as Intel. There are only three foundries in the world in that conversation: TSMC, Intel and Samsung. Only one of those three has been consistently executing in the EUV era (2016+).Notton said:Uhh.... Texas Instruments? Micron? -
rluker5 I agree with thesrtryker's point of tying investments to the continuation of node advancement. Especially at this point when Intel already has one foot in the door for that.Reply
The country already pays for many less fruitful scientific pursuits. -
magbarn
Excactly. China's government has dumped well over a $100 billion dollars into their chip building industry. Taiwan has forbidden TSMC AZ from making the latest process nodes. In fact, TSMC AZ is going to be making 3nm finally in 2027, 5 years behind their Taiwan fab.thestryker said:This sort of investment makes sense if it's tied into firm requirements. Building additional fabs is important, but at the country level they're only important if Intel continues node advancement. Without node advancement it's effectively just an interest free cash injection for additional capacity.
TSMC was built on the back of national investment and has continued to get beneficial treatment. Rapidus in Japan would be nowhere without the heavy government backing. This is the reality of bleeding edge manufacturing and if having home grown technology is important to the country it's necessary.