AMD's dual-cache Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 appears in first benchmark leaks — gaming-focused CPU features 192MB of L3 cache stacked across both CCDs
Early numbers paint a likable picture.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
In late October, AMD's mid-cycle Zen 5 refresh leaked, giving us a glimpse at two new X3D CPUs the company has in store for CES 2026. One of those was the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, a higher-boosting version of the existing 9800X3D, and which has been featured in several leaks over the past few weeks. The other chip was a lot more mysterious: a supposed dual-cache Ryzen 9 9950X3D2, but updates on it went radio silent ever since — today, it has finally reappeared on both PassMark and Geekbench.
In PassMark, the 9950X3D2 achieved a multi-score rating of 71,585 and a single-core rating of 4,716. Both of those numbers are within the margin of error of the 9950X and 9950X3D, but a bit far from the highest-scoring CPUs on the database. Keep in mind that PassMark listings can be fabricated, so take all this with a heavy grain of salt.
The 9950X3D2 is reported to carry a whopping 192 MB of total L3 cache, which PassMark confirms, achieved by stacking it across both CCDs. It features the same 16-core, 32-thread layout as the 9950X and 9950X3D, but instead of 3D V-Cache on just one chiplet, it's present underneath both. This doubles the otherwise 96 MB L3 cache (32 MB L3 + 64 MB X3D) to 192 MB.
This would be the first time the chipmaker has achieved such a feat, rounding out an impressive generation as Zen 5 already made a massive leap by fully unlocking these SKUs. That was made possible by putting the extra 3D V-Cache under the CCD instead of on top, allowing for better thermal and power efficiency. Now, doubling that cache can lead to even more (albeit slight) gains in gaming workloads.
The second leak comes courtesy of Geekbench, where it appeared on socketed on a Galax B850M motherboard, paired with 96 GB of DDR5 memory. This listing confirms the boost clocks at 5.6 GHz, which aligns with the initial rumor. The 9950X3D2 scores 3,456 in the single-core test — the highest on Geekbench's processor benchmark database — while netting 21,062 points in the multi-core test, close to its namesake 16-core brethren.
Both the PassMark and Geekbench listings reiterate the core config, while the former mentions the 9950X3D2 as a 170W CPU, going against the 200W TDP that was being thrown around till now. AMD could've tweaked the final specs, or what's more likely is just the lack of samples and early nature of these runs has led to incorrect reporting.
These appearances suggest that either the CPUs have started to be shipped off to reviewers, or that motherboard vendors are testing these to configure the BIOS for launch.
This leak comes with CES 2026 right around the corner, where AMD could reveal new processors.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
Stomx Why Intel not adding large L3 caches to its chips? Who cares for additional 30 W of power consumption when GPUs trash 500, soon will 1 kW and for their AI exercises some folks already run four 3090/5090.Reply
I already upgraded my PSU to 3 kW and 240V -
Dntknwitall I remember a few months back when many were saying that dual ccd 3d cache was basically impossible and wouldn't come to fruition, and i said they would be eating their words cause AMD will find a way to do it. Well here we are they have done it and i was right as I am with many things people argue with me about. Thanks for making it all to easy AMD.Reply -
80251 It's hilarious and ironic Intel was the 1st to come out w/large L3 cache (128MiB of eDRAM) w/their i7-5775c, which despite showing clear benefits (esp. in gaming) they decided to give up on.Reply
Whoever made that dumb decision should've been fired. -
TerryLaze Reply
It's a business, if something is too expensive to do it's not a good idea to do it.80251 said:It's hilarious and ironic Intel was the 1st to come out w/large L3 cache (128MiB of eDRAM) w/their i7-5775c, which despite showing clear benefits (esp. in gaming) they decided to give up on.
Whoever made that dumb decision should've been fired.
AMD is barely making any money from consumer CPUs and a big reason for that is that the cache costs more, other than also big cores costing more than smaller ones.