Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super review: More VRAM and bandwidth, slightly higher performance

There's surprisingly little uplift in most games from the memory upgrades.

Asus RTX 4070 Ti Super TUF Gaming card photos and unboxing
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The RTX 4070 Ti Super improves Nvidia's offerings, landing right between the 4070 Ti and 4080. It replaces the 4070 Ti in the product stack, at the same still-high $799 price point. The additional memory helps in certain workloads, and it's a decent upgrade overall, especially for anyone still running an older GPU.

Pros

  • +

    Good overall performance

  • +

    16GB and 256-bit interface

  • +

    DLSS, AI, AV1, and ray tracing

  • +

    More cores and VRAM, same price

Cons

  • -

    Only moderately faster than 4070 Ti

  • -

    Expensive and out of reach for many gamers

  • -

    Limited RGB on Asus card (could be a pro for some)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Super marks the second salvo in Nvidia's mid-cycle 40-series Super refresh, taking over from the existing RTX 4070 Ti that will now be phased out. On paper, this looks like a nice upgrade, bumping from the AD104 to the AD103 GPU and, in the process, adding 4GB of memory and a 64-bit wider interface, plus 10% more shader cores, all at the same $799 MSRP. But therein lies the problem, as the Ada Lovelace architecture has always felt like too much of a generational increase in pricing. Still, the RTX 4070 Ti Super, with both of its suffixes, will go up against the best graphics cards, hoping to entice gamers who haven't snagged a GPU in a few years.

We noted at the announcement, as well as in the RTX 4070 Super review, that the cards appear to be launching in reverse order of excitement. We found plenty to like with the 4070 Super, and the additional memory finally gets Nvidia to 16GB of VRAM and a 256-bit interface for under $800. Prior to the 4070 Ti Super, you would have needed to spend 50% to get the RTX 4080 if you wanted that much memory and bandwidth, and at that point, why not just go all the way and buy an RTX 4090? It's not that $799 graphics cards are affordable, but they're certainly more affordable than what was previously available.

Realistically, no one who has already purchased an RTX 40-series GPU or one of AMD's RX 7000-series RDNA 3 GPU alternatives will be looking to buy one of the new Super models. Instead, it's those who haven't upgraded since the RTX 20-series and RX 5000-series (or earlier) that are the target. That means we're talking about people who waited an extra year for a bump in performance and specs and don't want to just give the current generation GPUs a pass and wait for RTX 50-series and RDNA 4. There are also people who might be building a new PC, of course, and if it's time to upgrade, then the Super cards all represent a move in the right direction: more performance, improved specs, and better values.

Here's the full rundown of the specifications for all the current generation Nvidia and AMD GPUs that have launched. Note that the RX 7600 XT and RTX 4080 Super are still missing, as those haven't quite launched yet — with the AMD part arriving tomorrow, alongside official retail availability for the 4070 Ti Super and the 4080 Super coming next week.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Graphics Card RTX 4070 Ti Super RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Super RTX 4070 RTX 4080 RTX 4060 Ti 16GB RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7700 XT RX 7600
Architecture AD103 AD104 AD104 AD104 AD103 AD106 AD106 AD107 Navi 31 Navi 31 Navi 32 Navi 32 Navi 33
Process Technology TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC 4N TSMC N5 + N6 TSMC N5 + N6 TSMC N5 + N6 TSMC N5 + N6 TSMC N6
Transistors (Billion) 45.9 35.8 32 32 45.9 22.9 22.9 18.9 45.6 + 6x 2.05 45.6 + 5x 2.05 28.1 + 4x 2.05 28.1 + 3x 2.05 13.3
Die size (mm^2) 378.6 294.5 294.5 294.5 378.6 187.8 187.8 158.7 300 + 225 300 + 225 200 + 150 200 + 113 204
SMs / CUs / Xe-Cores 66 60 56 46 76 34 34 24 96 84 60 54 32
GPU Cores (Shaders) 8448 7680 7168 5888 9728 4352 4352 3072 6144 5376 3840 3456 2048
Tensor / AI Cores 264 240 224 184 304 136 136 96 192 168 120 108 64
Ray Tracing Cores 66 60 56 46 76 34 34 24 96 84 60 54 32
Boost Clock (MHz) 2610 2610 2475 2475 2505 2535 2535 2460 2500 2400 2430 2544 2655
VRAM Speed (Gbps) 21 21 21 21 22.4 18 18 17 20 20 19.5 18 18
VRAM (GB) 16 12 12 12 16 16 8 8 24 20 16 12 8
VRAM Bus Width 256 192 192 192 256 128 128 128 384 320 256 192 128
L2 / Infinity Cache 48 48 48 36 64 32 32 24 96 80 64 48 32
Render Output Units 96 80 80 64 112 48 48 48 192 192 96 96 64
Texture Mapping Units 264 240 224 184 304 136 136 96 384 336 240 216 128
TFLOPS FP32 (Boost) 44.1 40.1 35.5 29.1 48.7 22.1 22.1 15.1 61.4 51.6 37.3 35.2 21.7
TFLOPS FP16 (FP8) 353 (706) 321 (641) 284 (568) 233 (466) 390 (780) 177 (353) 177 (353) 121 (242) 122.8 103.2 74.6 70.4 43.4
Bandwidth (GBps) 672 504 504 504 717 288 288 272 960 800 624 432 288
TDP (watts) 285 285 220 200 320 160 160 115 355 315 263 245 165
Launch Date Jan 2024 Jan 2023 Jan 2024 Apr 2023 Nov 2022 Jul 2023 May 2023 Jul 2023 Dec 2022 Dec 2022 Sep 2023 Sep 2023 May 2023
Launch Price $799 $799 $599 $599 $1,199 $499 $399 $299 $999 $899 $499 $449 $269
Online Price $800 $740 $600 $535 $1,160 $450 $385 $300 $960 $760 $510 $440 $260
Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Loadedaxe
    As always, very thorough review. I wish these insane prices would come down to normal levels.

    If no one had credit cards, they would not be selling well at all. I am still going to hold out until the offerings from both AMDs and Nvidias next gen arrives.
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    Wow, that's... disappointing, honestly. Like Jarred mentioned, I too was expecting it to be closer to the 4080. At the very least, I thought it would consistently outperform the 7900XT at 1440p.

    I had my eye on this card to finally replace my RTX 2060, but after seeing these benchmarks, I'm not so sure.
    Part of me wants to have the better memory specs, in case games coming over the next few years will benefit more from it (Alan Wake seems to show that.) And I may upgrade from 1440p to 4K, but not for at least a year. But futureproofing is hard, since I don't own a crystal ball.
    The other part of me thinks the 4070 Super is close enough in performance, and I could use the saved $200 to buy a 4TB SSD that I could make use of. But I don't wanna regret my decision in 2 years.But with either choice, I'm sure I'll be absolutely ecstatic when I upgrade from my 2060. : P

    In any case - awesome review, Jarred! You do great work. : )
    Reply
  • Colif
    Nvidia repeating what they did with 2070 Super.
    4070 TI Super is mostly a 4080
    2070 Super was mostly a 2080

    Guess old play book worked back then.
    8U_S8vrRs-Y
    Reply
  • DavidLejdar
    Thanks for the detailed review! I don't care much for ray-tracing. So, if I'd upgrade towards 4K, it looks like the RX 7900 XT would be a better option for me - as it is a bit cheaper and with a bit more rasterization performance.
    Loadedaxe said:
    As always, very thorough review. I wish these insane prices would come down to normal levels.

    If no one had credit cards, they would not be selling well at all. I am still going to hold out until the offerings from both AMDs and Nvidias next gen arrives.
    It sure ain't cheap. In my case, I easily miss out on some other stuff though. I.e., it hasn't been until 2023 that I got me a smartphone (and then only a cheap one) - meanwhile at home, a rig with DDR5 RAM already, which should last some years.

    Also, here in Germany, we have universal health-care and federal minimum wage of 12.42 Euro. So even with locally low salary (full-time), and after payslip-deductions (such as for that mandatory health-care insurance), and with not too high a rent (as not every owner here needs money for a golf course), it is possible to save up a bit for a rig (without worry of needing a fortune for medical expenses).

    And some accountancy helps too. Like, when someone spends i.e. $2 a day on fizzy drinks, drinking water instead means a saving of nearly $60 a month, or $720 a year. Smoking? Smoke some less. And voila, $800 for a GPU, while having improved health.

    Not saying that I will get me a new GPU soon, and no reason to overspend of course. And if I'd be living in the countryside, to begin with, I'd would likely need a car and pay insurance for it, even if driving only a few miles every day on empty roads. Etc. But if one can put aside some $40 a month (without interest rate), not that tough to have a modern rig.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    AMD will likely need to lower the MSRP of the 7900 cards.

    Smart move would be to match the 7900XTX msrp to the new 4070ti Super.
    Reply
  • Devoteicon
    Loadedaxe said:
    I wish these insane prices would come down to normal levels.
    They are normal.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    All I can say is, go Intel? Need a disruption in the upper mid-range for sure. Even if it is 4070 Super / 7800XT levels of performance that would kick off some re-pricing.
    Reply
  • FoxtrotMichael-1
    Loadedaxe said:
    I wish these insane prices would come down to normal levels.
    I'm not sure what else you spend your money on but inflation has affected every aspect of the economy. Just about everything I buy for a family of 5 is twice as expensive as it was a decade ago.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Eximo said:
    All I can say is, go Intel? Need a disruption in the upper mid-range for sure. Even if it is 4070 Super / 7800XT levels of performance that would kick off some re-pricing.
    100% agree and watching for it
    Reply
  • edzieba
    There's surprisingly little uplift in most games from the memory upgrades
    No surprise at all: the 4xxx (and 3xxxs) series have not been memory capacity limited in any of the cards released thus far. Even the 4060Ti 8/16gb only started to see serious performance disparities when settings were cranked far enough for the performance choice to be between "not very good" and "still not very good", so 12GB/16GB is going to offer naff-all in real world testing.

    Remember: buy cards based on actual benchmarking (ideally of the games you play), not based on numbers on the box.
    Reply