Best Gaming Monitors

After years of near-stagnation, the monitor space—and the gaming monitor space in particular—has exploded with innovation in recent years. There’s screen-smoothing adaptive refresh (in both AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync flavors), ultra-high refresh rates (up to 240Hz!), curved displays & ultrawides (both aimed at increasing immersion), and pixel-dense 4K screens with high refresh that are visually stunning, but as hard on the wallet as they are on pretty much any graphics card setup.

That’s not to mention the various panel technologies, which all have their own advantages and weaknesses. Various types of IPS, TN and VA technologies are all vying for your eyeballs—and your wallet.

How do you tell what’s the best screen for your gaming needs in this complex minefield of marketing and actually impressive technological advancements? If you’re not sure where to start (or what most of the jargon above actually means) our monitor buying guide is a good place to start. But if you already know what features you’re after and just want a short list of the best of what’s currently available, you can find our favorites, among the dozens we’ve tested broken out by major categories below.

Why Trust Us

Tom's Hardware has been reviewing PC hardware for more than two decades. We put each monitor through a battery of tests which measure everything from brightness and contrast to color accuracy and response time.  We've tested hundreds of models, from 60-hz budget panels for feature-packed flagship screens, so we can separate the best from the dim and inaccurate disappointments.

Quick Shopping Tips

  • Panel technologies: when it comes to display, TN < IPS ≠ VA. TN monitors are the fastest but cheapest due to poorer viewing angles. IPS monitors have slightly slower response times and show color better than VA monitors, but VA monitors have better contrast than IPS displays.
  • Refresh rates: bigger numbers are better. This tells you the number of times your monitor updates with new information per second and is measured in hertz (Hz), and therefore the number of frames per second (fps) the monitor is capable of actually displaying on screen. Bigger numbers equal smoother images. If you’re a gamer, refresh rate is especially important, and you’ll want a monitor with at least 75Hz (most monitors designed for gaming offer at least 144Hz), combined with the lowest response time you can find.
  • Curved or non-curved? This depends on preference. The logic behind curved monitors is that they more closely mimic the curved manner in which your eyeballs see, but some notice the difference more than others. Further, you may not like the appearance of a curved monitor if it’s against a wall (it’ll stick out more), or if you’re opposed to the widescreen ratios of most curved monitors. Many will tell you a curved monitor is worthless if it’s smaller than 30 inches, which also has pricing implications. If you’re unsure, try one out and see if you notice any difference. If not, don’t bother paying more.

Best 4K Gaming Monitor

With densely packed pixels and less of a need to switch on anti-aliasing effects, 4K screens (3840x2160 resolution) can deliver truly stunning visuals. But keep in mind you’ll need a very powerful graphics card to achieve smooth frame rates. And most 4K panels are limited to 60Hz refresh rates due to connectivity bandwidth limitations. So serious competitive gamers may want to look elsewhere.

Alternate:

Best 144hz Gaming Monitor

These high-refresh screens used to be the bleeding edge of gaming, with their abilities to deliver triple-digit frame rates. While faster panels have now been introduced, 144Hz screens still offer a good balance of high-end performance at reasonably price points. While competitive esports swear by extremely fast refresh rates, it’s arguably whether the eye—and your body’s reflexes—can tell the difference between 144Hz and panels and pricier faster models capable of running at 200Hz and up.

Alternate:

Best Budget Gaming Monitor

Not everyone can afford to drop several hundred dollars (or more) on a gaming screen. And many people shouldn’t. For more casual gamers, and those who often use their PCs for productivity purposes as well, a good 60Hz panel is sufficient—especially if you don’t also have a high-end card capable of pushing modern games beyond 60 frames per second (fps).

Alternate:

Best Curved Gaming Monitor

Curved TVs are kind of silly. But it’s arguable that a monitor, which you’ll usually be sitting directly in front of, provides a better sense of immersion—particularly if your monitor is also an ultra-wide model. The wider field of view does a better job of realistically portraying first-person fields of view while also providing a less physically restrictive window on your gaming world of choice. Just be sure to check out a few in stores if possible, as some people prefer screens with tighter curves than others.

Alternate:

Best Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

The wider field of view of an ultra-wide monitor is particularly good for first-person games, especially if the monitor is also curved. This provides a more realistic view of what’s happening around you, rather than the more condensed visuals you get from a more standard screen ratio. When you aren’t gaming, ultra-wide screens are also great for productivity, letting you display more full-sized documents and Web pages side-by-side at once.

Alternate:

Best G-Sync Gaming Monitor

If you have an Nvidia graphics card and are looking for the smoothest gaming experience possible, a G-Sync-capable monitor should be on your short list. In general, G-Sync monitors provide a better overall experience than AMD’s competing screen-smoothing FreeSync tech. But G-Sync monitors also require additional hardware to do their screen-smoothing work. So, expect to pay more for your ultra-smooth G-Sync experience compared to FreeSync monitors or displays without variable refresh features at all.

Alternate:

Best Freesync Gaming Monitor

AMD’s FreeSync tech (and the newer FreeSync 2) eliminates screen tearing in games via screen-smoothing variable refresh tech, so long as you’re using an AMD graphics card. FreeSync also doesn’t require additional hardware, so monitors don’t tend to cost significantly more than monitors that don’t have variable refresh. Just note that the variable refresh window varies from monitor to monitor and can be narrower than many competing G-Sync monitors. But G-Sync monitors cost more, and if you have an AMD card, variable refresh won’t work with a G-Sync screen.

Alternate:

Best 240Hz Gaming Monitors

For gamers who place prime importance on smooth gaming and lightning-fast response times, these displays offer the best of the best, and are a good fit for very serious gamers. That said, you will need a very high-end graphics card to push these screens to their limits. And it’s arguable how much real-world differences they offer most gamers compared to 144Hz or 200Hz monitors.

Best 240Hz G-Sync Gaming Monitor

Best 240Hz FreeSync Gaming Monitor

MORE: How We Test Monitors

MORE: How To Choose A Monitor

MORE: All Monitor Content

 

 

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
15 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • rabbit4me1
    Your views are completely biased typical Tom's Hardware. He completely forgot to mention the LG 32 inch gaming monitor with g-sync completely blows away the Predator line. But now I believe Tom's is biased toward that particular line anyway.?
  • hannibal
    Would you consider adding bed HDR monitors?
    It is the next trend in monitors and so many "HDR" monitor is not really HDR because of poor panel can not show HRD content as they should... And HDR is really interesting concept, if and when it is supported by software.
  • islandwalker
    We would and will add picks for HDR monitors. I personally use a Sony HDR 4K TV with a peak brightness of about 900 nits as my monitor at home (and do a fair bit of gaming). But in terms of HDR gaming content and gaming-specific HDR monitors, I think we're still in the very early stages. Once we see more games and gaming screens, particularly those rated at HDR 600 and up, we will add a section for HDR gaming monitors. In the meantime, you can check out our monitor reviews page, which has reviews of more than a few HDR dispays--just not gaming-specific models.
  • nobspls
    We need a category for best 4K 40" and larger with g-sync.
  • derekullo
    Anonymous said:
    We need a category for best 4K 40" and larger with g-sync.


    Consider waiting for the release of the BFG displays. (Big Format Gaming)

    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/big-format-gaming-displays/
    https://www.asus.com/ROG-Republic-Of-Gamers/ROG-Swift-PG65/

    65", 4k, 120 hertz with G-Sync

    I don't expect it to be cheap, but I do expect it to be sexy.
  • papality
    I guess nobody told Tom’s that the X27 came out
  • tntermimator
    How about this one for $220? Did I do good?
    "Acer Gaming Monitor 27” Curved ED273 Abidpx 1920 x 1080 144Hz Refresh Rate AMD FREESYNC Technology"
  • milkod2001
    Many options there still nothing close what i and believe also many others would want. 32'' 100Hz+ non curved 4k Gsync or Freesync and factory calibrated at reasonable price around $1000 max.
  • papality
    You're not gonna get a monitor with feature set at a price that low until you get mainstream (ie ~$250) single GPUs that can drive that performance. There's way too much engineering involved in a panel that can do HFR + 4K + G-Sync to make it that cheap.
  • hang-the-9
    Seems there is a big jump in the prices in the article, $170 for budget, then goes up to almost $400, then to $500 and up.

    There must be a 24-27" model range with 75,120,144hz good for gaming that is in the $200 range to put in also.
  • willie nugs
    Why is there no ultra-wide category? Not a single 3440x1440 monitor on this entire list!
  • deemon
    I would like the list of best FreeSync 2 displays. Because HDR... + FreeSync.
  • careysb
    I would like to see a review of 43" 4k/UHD monitors. Seems that many (all?) have an issue with pixels where glass meets bezel. There is also a lot of confusion when it comes to supplied software to split the screen into multiple virtual screens. One customer review talked about virtual screens automatically expanded running apps to fill the virtual screen. Very undesirable in my opinion.

    The top of my list so far is LG, followed by Dell.
  • JohnBonhamsGhost
    why have they ignored high refresh-rate, high resolution, extra-wide screen, and/or curved all-in-ones? this is not a very good article for knowledge on modern screen options.