Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 Review: A New Level Of Extreme

Samsung’s Odyssey Neo G8 is a 32-inch curved VA panel with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, G-Sync & FreeSync certification, HDR2000, 1,196-zone Mini LED backlight and wide gamut color.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G8
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Despite just-average color volume, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 beats the 4K competition in every other performance metric. And it’s a relatively good value besides. If you have a fast PC and are looking for the ultimate gaming monitor, it’s hard to imagine a better display.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Stunning SDR and HDR images

  • +

    Color accurate out of the box

  • +

    Next-level gaming performance

  • +

    Smooth motion processing and low input lag

  • +

    Excellent value

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Color gamut volume is just average

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The debate between speed and resolution in gaming monitors is a matter of perspective. If you play fast-paced shooters or eSports games, additional speed will give you a competitive advantage. High frame rates mean the picture will stay sharp when objects and backgrounds move quickly. But high resolution and pixel density are better choices if you like to take in the view and explore the virtual environment.

Many players want 4K simply because the latest consoles support it. But that comes with a hit to frame rates. The fastest and best 4K gaming monitors have been limited to 144 Hz or slightly higher with overclocking; until now. Samsung has just raised the bar with a 240 Hz 4K monitor, the first I’ve ever tested. The Odyssey Neo G8 is a 32-inch VA panel with a 1000R curve, HDR, Adaptive-Sync, a 1,196-zone dimming Mini LED backlight and 2,000 nits peak in HDR mode. This monitor checks all the right boxes that should put it squarely in contention as one of the Best 4K Gaming Monitors.

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • Dantte
    I've read multiple reviews on this monitor and every single one has said the same thing except this one:
    SCANLINES SCANLINES SCANLINES are so bad on the G8, one review put it on their "do not buy" list
    Buying Samsung is like playing the lottery, some will get a good one and most will get a bad one
    The Neo G7 beats the G8 in every aspect except speed, but seriously you are buying this monitor for image quality and there isnt a graphics card on the planet that can push 4K@240FPS, so do yourselves a favor and get the better Neo G7 165Hz version.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Dantte said:
    I've read multiple reviews on this monitor and every single one has said the same thing except this one:
    SCANLINES SCANLINES SCANLINES are so bad on the G8, one review put it on their "do not buy" list
    Buying Samsung is like playing the lottery, some will get a good one and most will get a bad one
    The Neo G7 beats the G8 in every aspect except speed, but seriously you are buying this monitor for image quality and there isnt a graphics card on the planet that can push 4K@240FPS, so do yourselves a favor and get the better Neo G7 165Hz version.
    Game choice and settings will get most things to 4k 240 easily.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    Samsung needs to quit with this 1000R BS.

    1500R was enough. 1800R is/was better.
    Reply
  • CaptRiker
    WHY only DP 1.4 ?!?! you'll only be able to hit 240 hz at 4k with HDMI 2.1

    a mega monitor this new should have included the latest DP spec. sigh
    Reply
  • colossusrage
    helper800 said:
    Game choice and settings will get most things to 4k 240 easily.
    Don't know about "easily" but definitely dependent on the game.
    Reply
  • drivinfast247
    helper800 said:
    Game choice and settings will get most things to 4k 240 easily.
    Curious as to what games and what PC specs for you to say "4k 240 easily"?
    Reply
  • helper800
    drivinfast247 said:
    Curious as to what games and what PC specs for you to say "4k 240 easily"?
    A 3060 with an 11 series 11400 will get you 4k 240 in all esports titles with med settings or lower. Non-engine locked older titles will do it as well with 4k support.
    Reply
  • truerock
    CaptRiker said:
    WHY only DP 1.4 ?!?! you'll only be able to hit 240 hz at 4k with HDMI 2.1

    a mega monitor this new should have included the latest DP spec. sigh

    Display Port 2.0 (and USB 4 v2) are not available on any Nvidia graphics card.

    I'm very glad Samsung has stepped up and delivered a monitor with these specs.
    There is definitely a chicken-and-egg situation in play regarding 4k, 10-bit, 120Hz monitors, graphics cards and games.
    Reply
  • drivinfast247
    helper800 said:
    A 3060 with an 11 series 11400 will get you 4k 240 in all esports titles with med settings or lower. Non-engine locked older titles will do it as well with 4k support.
    Why on planet earth would ANYONE spend twice the cost of their PC on a monitor to play CS:GO @ 4k low?
    Reply
  • helper800
    drivinfast247 said:
    Why on planet earth would ANYONE spend twice the cost of their PC on a monitor to play CS:GO @ 4k low?
    Why would anyone buy an esports monitor to get esports fps in an esports game for as cheap as possible? Even if not, my argument was not that someone would do it (they do), it was that its simply possible. Here is a quick and dirty comparison, can even play at med to high in esports games at 4k 240.
    Reply