MSI Katana 17 HX gaming laptop review: 1080p gaming with Nvidia’s RTX 5070

RTX 50-series gaming at a much more palatable price point

MSI Katana 17 HX
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Katana 17 HX’s underlying hardware is solid with strong performance at a decent price, but the system needs a bit more polish.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Competitive 1080p gaming performance

  • +

    Attractive pricing

  • +

    Class-competitive battery life

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Display is dim and not as vibrant as competing laptops

  • -

    Productivity performance falls behind its peers

  • -

    Fans are loud

  • -

    Finicky touchpad-

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Since the introduction of gaming laptops featuring Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 50 Series GPUs earlier this year, most of the review units that we’ve received for testing have skewed towards the high-end. That means laptops with price tags surpassing $2,000, and at times, $3,000 or more. However, not every gamer has a budget that high or wants to spend that much on a laptop.

Thankfully, we’re starting to see less expensive RTX 50 laptops enter the market, including our MSI Katana 17 HX review unit. As its name suggests, the laptop features a large 17-inch display, an Intel Core i7-14650HX processor, an RTX 5070 GPU, 16GB of RAM, and a spacious 1TB SSD. Best of all, the laptop carries a price tag of just $1,300, which is at least in the realm of affordability.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Brandon Hill
Senior Editor

Brandon Hill is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware. He has written about PC and Mac tech since the late 1990s with bylines at AnandTech, DailyTech, and Hot Hardware. When he is not consuming copious amounts of tech news, he can be found enjoying the NC mountains or the beach with his wife and two sons.

  • cknobman
    Seriously in 2025 they are selling $1300 gaming laptops with 1080p displays?
    Seems like we are on replay from 2018.
    Reply
  • Narfhead
    cknobman said:
    Seriously in 2025 they are selling $1300 gaming laptops with 1080p displays?
    Seems like we are on replay from 2018.
    I do most gaming on mobile at 720p 25 fps and I think it looks pretty good.
    1080p is more than enough for me. Of course, I don't have 1300 dollars to throw away, so there's that.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    Narfhead said:
    I do most gaming on mobile at 720p 25 fps and I think it looks pretty good.
    1080p is more than enough for me. Of course, I don't have 1300 dollars to throw away, so there's that.
    I love my steam deck and 720-800p gaming on it.
    But its also priced appropriately with a screen small enough to make the resolution a non issue.

    But $1300 for 1080p gaming? 8GB vram?
    For a laptop?

    Hard pass.
    Reply
  • Pemalite
    $1300 for a large 1080P notebook display and an 8GB VRAM GPU with 384GB/s of bandwidth is pretty crap...

    You are better off saving some cash and going with a Geforce 5060Ti notebook and upgrading next year.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    So wait up, having a 8GB desktop GPU makes your computer explode and creates an black hole, but having an 8GB laptop GPU is fine...
    Reply
  • thestryker
    So an i5 masquerading as an i7, 5060 masquerading as a 5070 (low power to boot) and average overall performance. It's a shame that nvidia has a true monopoly in laptops because the 5070 Ti models all seem to start at over $2000 and that's the lowest model with more than 8GB VRAM. At least the display on this one is 1080p so there's no delusion about the overall viability of 1440p+ gaming with an 8GB video card.

    At least the uplift from 40 series to 50 series is relatively low so there might be some decent deals to be had on closeouts or refurbs with 4080s.

    Hopefully whatever cards come next (at the very least 70 series) will just use 3GB memory IC so the 128-bit bus width cards will at least have 12GB VRAM.
    Reply