Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 Review: A New Level Of Extreme

Samsung’s Odyssey Neo G8 is a 32-inch curved VA panel with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, G-Sync & FreeSync certification, HDR2000, 1,196-zone Mini LED backlight and wide gamut color.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G8
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The G8 can be enjoyed without calibration in its Custom mode, or sRGB if you need the smaller gamut. A bit of tweaking produces better numbers but no visible change in quality.

Grayscale and Gamma Tracking

Our grayscale and gamma tests use Calman calibration software from Portrait Displays. We describe our grayscale and gamma tests in detail here.

The only visible error in the G8’s default grayscale measurement run is at 100% brightness. This will be nearly impossible to spot in real-world content. Gamma runs a tad light, but this is minor.

My calibration required some compromise. I adjusted the RGB sliders to dial in the 80% step, but that introduced a visible green error in the darker steps. By adding in a click of blue, I got all errors under 3dE. The visual difference is minute. Gamma proved to be a choice of either too light or too dark. After viewing familiar content, I settled on the latter because it had superior color saturation.

sRGB grayscale and gamma tracking are nearly perfect, with no visible errors. You can make the same choice in gamma if you wish. Mode 1 is what’s shown above. Mode 2 is lighter yet and Mode 3 is darker.

Comparisons

The G8 compares well in the pre-calibration test with a 2.19dE average error. Calibration makes little difference, so it slips to last place. But the errors are still invisible, so all the monitors look the same in practice.

The gamma tests show the G8 to have average luminance tracking accuracy with a reasonably tight 0.14 range of values and a 4.54% deviation from 2.2. That’s on Mode 3 with an actual value of 2.30. On Mode 1, the actual average is 2.13 (3.18% deviation), so it’s a little closer to spec. But I prefer the image at Mode 3 for its superior color saturation.

Color Gamut Accuracy

Our color gamut and volume testing use Portrait Displays’ Calman software. For details on our color gamut testing and volume calculations, click here.

At the G8’s default settings, the gamut is mostly on-point with a slight red under-saturation. Green is under as well, which is typical of extended color screens. After calibration, the chart looks much the same, but by choosing gamma Mode 3, there is greater saturation in red and magenta. This makes a visible difference. The average error is slightly lower (2.35dE) on Mode 1, but again, the picture looks better on Mode 3.

sRGB has a little under-saturation in red and a hue error in magenta but overall, it is on spec with a low 1.65dE average. This mode is perfectly viable for color-critical work.

Comparisons

Since I chose the Odyssey Neo G8’s gamma Mode 3, the color error is slightly higher than where I started. But because red saturation is increased, the picture is better. This is an example of compromise within the specification. No matter which way you go, the errors are below 3dE. And you can choose either gamma while remaining accurate. It’s nice to have two choices that are both good. I cannot fault the G8’s color fidelity.

I had expected a little more color volume from the G8’s Quantum Dot backlight, but 89.58% coverage of DCI-P3 is still respectable. If color volume is a priority for you, there are monitors with more, like the ViewSonic, which is an overachiever. But, for gaming, the G8 will satisfy. Its sRGB volume is nearly ideal, with only a slight under-saturation in the red primary.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor: A 2022 Guide

MORE: How to Choose the Best HDR Monitor

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • Dantte
    I've read multiple reviews on this monitor and every single one has said the same thing except this one:
    SCANLINES SCANLINES SCANLINES are so bad on the G8, one review put it on their "do not buy" list
    Buying Samsung is like playing the lottery, some will get a good one and most will get a bad one
    The Neo G7 beats the G8 in every aspect except speed, but seriously you are buying this monitor for image quality and there isnt a graphics card on the planet that can push 4K@240FPS, so do yourselves a favor and get the better Neo G7 165Hz version.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Dantte said:
    I've read multiple reviews on this monitor and every single one has said the same thing except this one:
    SCANLINES SCANLINES SCANLINES are so bad on the G8, one review put it on their "do not buy" list
    Buying Samsung is like playing the lottery, some will get a good one and most will get a bad one
    The Neo G7 beats the G8 in every aspect except speed, but seriously you are buying this monitor for image quality and there isnt a graphics card on the planet that can push 4K@240FPS, so do yourselves a favor and get the better Neo G7 165Hz version.
    Game choice and settings will get most things to 4k 240 easily.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    Samsung needs to quit with this 1000R BS.

    1500R was enough. 1800R is/was better.
    Reply
  • CaptRiker
    WHY only DP 1.4 ?!?! you'll only be able to hit 240 hz at 4k with HDMI 2.1

    a mega monitor this new should have included the latest DP spec. sigh
    Reply
  • colossusrage
    helper800 said:
    Game choice and settings will get most things to 4k 240 easily.
    Don't know about "easily" but definitely dependent on the game.
    Reply
  • drivinfast247
    helper800 said:
    Game choice and settings will get most things to 4k 240 easily.
    Curious as to what games and what PC specs for you to say "4k 240 easily"?
    Reply
  • helper800
    drivinfast247 said:
    Curious as to what games and what PC specs for you to say "4k 240 easily"?
    A 3060 with an 11 series 11400 will get you 4k 240 in all esports titles with med settings or lower. Non-engine locked older titles will do it as well with 4k support.
    Reply
  • truerock
    CaptRiker said:
    WHY only DP 1.4 ?!?! you'll only be able to hit 240 hz at 4k with HDMI 2.1

    a mega monitor this new should have included the latest DP spec. sigh

    Display Port 2.0 (and USB 4 v2) are not available on any Nvidia graphics card.

    I'm very glad Samsung has stepped up and delivered a monitor with these specs.
    There is definitely a chicken-and-egg situation in play regarding 4k, 10-bit, 120Hz monitors, graphics cards and games.
    Reply
  • drivinfast247
    helper800 said:
    A 3060 with an 11 series 11400 will get you 4k 240 in all esports titles with med settings or lower. Non-engine locked older titles will do it as well with 4k support.
    Why on planet earth would ANYONE spend twice the cost of their PC on a monitor to play CS:GO @ 4k low?
    Reply
  • helper800
    drivinfast247 said:
    Why on planet earth would ANYONE spend twice the cost of their PC on a monitor to play CS:GO @ 4k low?
    Why would anyone buy an esports monitor to get esports fps in an esports game for as cheap as possible? Even if not, my argument was not that someone would do it (they do), it was that its simply possible. Here is a quick and dirty comparison, can even play at med to high in esports games at 4k 240.
    Reply