Asus ROG Xbox Ally X review: Getting a grip on Windows gaming

Finally, a version of Windows 11 focused on gaming handhelds.

Asus ROG Xbox Ally X
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus ROG Xbox Ally X has excellent ergonomics thanks to controller-style grips, and Microsoft's handheld-focused Xbox experience is far better than using the Windows 11 desktop. The AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme delivers improved performance, but it may not be worth upgrading if you have an existing Ally.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Comfortable with controller grips and balanced weight

  • +

    Xbox Full Screen Experience is way easier to use than standard Windows 11

  • +

    Improved performance, especially at 720p

  • +

    Finally, an Xbox button

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    More expensive than last-gen ROG Ally X

  • -

    Screen isn't as vivid as OLED-based competition

  • -

    No included carrying case

  • -

    Some features are promised down the line, so this isn't finished yet

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Outside of Valve's Steam Deck, the weakest link in PC gaming handhelds has been Windows 11. Time after time after time, Windows 11's lack of a true gaming-first mode has made it just short of a dealbreaker even on some of the best PC gaming handhelds.

But when Asus teamed up with Xbox on the Asus ROG Xbox Ally X ($999.99 as tested), it didn't just mean new hardware with the AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme chip and comfortable grips; it also meant a full-screen Xbox mode that is easy to navigate with a controller and even hides some of the components from Windows 11 that can slow down gaming. It doesn't have Steam Deck levels of polish, but it's a revelation compared to the standard Windows desktop.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Heat_Fan89
    Too expensive for what it does and it short time you'll read that a new more powerful version is coming out. I'd rather put that money towards a desktop build.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    I really want to see the performance implications when SteamOS is installed on this device.
    Reply
  • colossusrage
    Heat_Fan89 said:
    Too expensive for what it does and it short time you'll read that a new more powerful version is coming out. I'd rather put that money towards a desktop build.
    Not really, AMD doesn't have anything coming out in the next year or two that should be significantly more powerful. Same goes for Intel and Nvidia doesn't make handheld type chips at this point. So where's that performance coming from? If anything I don't see a truly more powerful handheld coming for at least 2-3 years when Zen 6 and RDNA 4 or 5 are put into an APU that can utilize FSR 4.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I think it's really gross that Asus/Microsoft have misbranded this device to trick people into thinking that this is an Xbox, when it is in no way compatible with Xbox.

    There is exactly 2 Xbox features carried into this device: First the officially licensed controller.
    Second, the junk GUI, which devotes literally half of the usable space on the home screen to poorly disclosed advertisements.

    Personally I think this entire class of devices are heavy, oversized, overpriced, fragile, inconvenient, and under performing (Even steam deck). So I'm not the customer here. Microsoft also has an extremely poor reputation when it comes to software support for their semi-portable devices (Zune, Surface, Windows phone, etc). I've similarly been disappointed with Asus's software on both my laptop and when they straight lied that they were going to let people unlock the bootloaders of their phones...

    But most importantly, the people who actually want a device like this are not going to get anything close to the experience they were promised, and that's what really sucks. They're being promised an Xbox, and this is not an Xbox. Its a PC. If you own the Xbox version of a game, this will not play it.

    Unless of course Xbox fans are coming to the platform solely for the ads, because you'd better believe they're going to keep nailing the classic Xbox "Devote a huge chunk of the screen to targeted ads for services you're already subscribed to" experience.
    Reply
  • GenericUser2001
    colossusrage said:
    Not really, AMD doesn't have anything coming out in the next year or two that should be significantly more powerful. Same goes for Intel and Nvidia doesn't make handheld type chips at this point. So where's that performance coming from? If anything I don't see a truly more powerful handheld coming for at least 2-3 years when Zen 6 and RDNA 4 or 5 are put into an APU that can utilize FSR 4.
    There are some smaller-brand handhelds (like the GPD Win 5) coming out soon that are cramming in Strix Halo chips; those units will be substantially more powerful. Granted, those devices will also be substantially more expensive.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Giroro said:
    I think it's really gross that Asus/Microsoft have misbranded this device to trick people into thinking that this is an Xbox, when it is in no way compatible with Xbox.
    Giroro said:
    Its a PC. If you own the Xbox version of a game, this will not play it.

    This is important to see repeated.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    From a technical standpoint these devices sound rather good and a step in the right direction. Unfortunately the pricing doesn't match the technical side.

    I still think the biggest selling point of the Steam Deck and original Ally were their respective price points. At launch the Steam Deck options were $400-600 and the Ally $600-700 (even though the $600 one really should have been less) which for usable handheld PCs was all new territory. These Asus handhelds are $600 for the same APU as the Steam Deck uses and $1000 for a small performance improvement over the Ally and Ally X (+43% and +25% cost).

    I pre-ordered the original Ally and have been happy with it, but nothing since has even remotely tempted me. The improvements have been so minimal yet the prices have all gone up. I don't think I'd buy another handheld unless it was closer to a 50% performance increase over what I've got and certainly the pricing needs to be reasonable.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Heat_Fan89 said:
    Too expensive for what it does and it short time you'll read that a new more powerful version is coming out. I'd rather put that money towards a desktop build.
    agreed these devices are for specific users and use cases.

    When I was in my late teens and early 20s I would have picked one up.

    However now when i'm out of the house and i'm driving or going places have no time for a mobile gaming platform regardless of how good it is. I just never have time to sit down and game when out. So I prefer the full desktop experience at home with my desk a big chair and much better ergonomics.
    Reply
  • blppt
    Maybe I'm missing something, but was there some reason given as to why MS wouldn't just make an Xbox compatible handheld since they're using the misleading branding?
    Reply
  • Notton
    blppt said:
    Maybe I'm missing something, but was there some reason given as to why MS wouldn't just make an Xbox compatible handheld since they're using the misleading branding?
    Allegedly, AMD required 10 million unit sales for a custom Xbox SoC, which is why Microsoft cancelled their own handheld.

    For reference, Steamdeck sold some 1.6 million on its launch year, in 2022. It's estimated Valve has hit 4 million sales in 2025 after 3 years.
    The estimated total sales of console/handheld PCs is around 6 to 8 million.
    Reply