Lenovo Legion Go Review: Bulky, Switch-Like Gaming PC

The Lenovo Legion Go has tons of hardware features, including detachable controllers, but that requires a big machine.

Lenovo Legion Go
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Lenovo Legion Go is a bulky handheld gaming PC with a bright display and detachable controllers. The sturdy kickstand is a welcome addition, but the high resolution won't work for all games, and a software learning curve makes it much more complicated than the Nintendo Switch it sort of emulates.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Bright, 8.8-inch display

  • +

    Detachable controllers (if you want them)

  • +

    Two USB-C ports

  • +

    Sturdy kickstand

  • +

    Comes with a case

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Performance sometimes falters on battery

  • -

    2560 x 1600 resolution isn't useful for most games

  • -

    Bulky for travel

  • -

    Can be difficult to navigate Windows with controllers

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

For every handheld gaming PC compared to the Nintendo Switch, we haven't seen a mainstream company release one that apes one of the Mario creator's major features: removable controllers. The Lenovo Legion Go ($699.99 to start, $749.99 as tested) does just that, but also differentiates itself from the Switch, as well as some of the best PC gaming handhelds like the  Valve Steam Deck and Asus ROG Ally with a bevy of features.

The Legion Go also has the biggest screen we've seen so far, with a mammoth 8.8-inch panel that happens to also boast gorgeous colors and a speedy refresh rate. Its 2560 x 1600 resolution, however, is out of reach for most games running on this platform. Lenovo also has more USB Type-C ports than its competitors, making it a more realistic option for those who want to both charge and connect to a monitor at the same time. It uses the AMD Z1 Extreme, the same chip that powers the ROG Ally.

But all of this engineering takes space, making the Legion Go bulkier than its competitors. For those who use all of the features, that may be worth it, but I think many may prefer a more portable system that is better at running games on battery.

Design and Comfort of the Lenovo Legion Go

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • peterf28
    I game on 40" fullHD tv, and I would not go under 32". 32" is minimum for any serious gaming. Portable gaming is good for Tetris or snake.
    Reply
  • tshrimp
    I just purchased the 2TB version at Microcenter. I don't find the Legion Go bulky, but I am used to the Steam Deck and this isn't much larger (11.8 x 5.15 x 1.61 vs 11.7 x 4.6 x 1.9) especially if you consider the screen size difference. Pros: Screen, comfort, joy sticks, D-pad, mouse responsiveness (and that it has one...looking at you Ally), performance (confused/strange on Tom Hardware's test results) mouse scroll wheel, kickstand, button feel and placement (see con as well), not having to use Heroic Launcher for non Steam games. easy to add games to the game launcher and usually show up without issue. Cons: FPS counter works ~5% of the time (installed MSI Afterburner), battery life, default VRAM set to 3GB (can change via BIOS, but not in Legion Space), Legion Space needs more features, and to remove game advertisements.

    All in all this is what I have been waiting for. More versatile than the Steam Deck, larger screen, and a lot of power for a handheld. There are some bugs that need to be ironed out, but the same can be said for both the Steam Deck and ROG Ally when they first launched. Thankfully this isn't really "Switch like" as that thing is mostly a first party app machine that gives me hand cramps ;).
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    Hm... this fills a certain niche, it's nice to have an alternative, but I would not buy this vs a switch for portability (size) or due to exclusives on there if I was on the Nintendo game bandwagon, and then again, I'm not sure I'd prefer this one over the Steam version with the solid Linux support and less overhead than Windows.

    That being said, if your niche is portable windows gaming, this might fill it for you.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I can't imagine using something 40% heavier than the Ally in a fully portable fashion. As it is the Ally is heavier than my 12.6" Android tablet which is about my limit for long term usage.

    I'm also surprised there wasn't a consistent performance advantage for the Legion over Ally given that it has ~17% more memory bandwidth even accounting for the extra ~11% pixels in the 1280x testing.
    Reply
  • helper800
    peterf28 said:
    I game on 40" fullHD tv, and I would not go under 32". 32" is minimum for any serious gaming. Portable gaming is good for Tetris or snake.
    Why do you need to have a 32"+ screen to be a 'serious' gamer? IMO 27" monitors are still pretty great especially if you can fit two of them or a double ultrawide instead of a 32" monitor. I have a 27, 32, and 55 inch OLED in front of me right now and would consider any of them for 'serious' gaming.
    Reply
  • tshrimp
    helper800 said:
    Why do you need to have a 32"+ screen to be a 'serious' gamer? IMO 27" monitors are still pretty great especially if you can fit two of them or a double ultrawide instead of a 32" monitor. I have a 27, 32, and 55 inch OLED in front of me right now and would consider any of them for 'serious' gaming.
    I thought most "professional" gamers used 24" high refresh screens. I guess they are not "Serious gamers" ;). I use a larger screen personally, but would never tell someone they are not a serious gamer because of screen size.
    Reply
  • helper800
    tshrimp said:
    I thought most "professional" gamers used 24" high refresh screens. I guess they are not "Serious gamers" ;). I use a larger screen personally, but would never tell someone they are not a serious gamer because of screen size.
    Right its almost a Truck size measuring contest, if you get my drift.
    Reply
  • peterf28
    helper800 said:
    Why do you need to have a 32"+ screen to be a 'serious' gamer? IMO 27" monitors are still pretty great especially if you can fit two of them or a double ultrawide instead of a 32" monitor. I have a 27, 32, and 55 inch OLED in front of me right now and would consider any of them for 'serious' gaming.
    Once you go 32"+, you cannot go back ..
    Reply
  • helper800
    peterf28 said:
    Once you go 32"+, you cannot go back ..
    I can easily.
    Reply