Steam Deck OLED Review: Console-Style Upgrade

A bigger, better OLED screen and a larger battery are among the Steam Deck OLED's many small improvements.

Steam Deck OLED
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Steam Deck OLED is a lighter, brighter version of Valve's handheld, with a larger battery and roomier storage options. But its performance is about the same, meaning it's likely only worth it for those who have waited to get a handheld gaming PC.

Pros

  • +

    Big, bright OLED display

  • +

    Larger battery

  • +

    Longer charging cable

  • +

    Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3

  • +

    1TB storage option

Cons

  • -

    HDR can be finicky

  • -

    Battery life is still not great for intense games

  • -

    Performance remains slightly behind AMD Z1 Extreme

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

With the original Steam Deck, Valve took console-level simplicity and made it collide with PC-grade customization. Now, with the Steam Deck OLED ($549 to start, $649 as tested), Valve is taking another move from the console playbook: the mid-cycle refresh.

This isn't the Steam Deck 2, nor the Steam Deck Slim. Like Sony and Microsoft have before it, Valve is using a die-shrink for a more efficient chip, but isn't changing performance targets for the Steam Deck OLED. This makes for, in theory, more battery life, especially with a new, larger 50-watt hour battery. Of course, battery life is also tied deeply to the display, and here, Valve has gone bigger with a 7.4-inch OLED panel that gets quite bright, with support for HDR games.

There are also a slew of small changes, including a switch to Wi-Fi 6E, adjustments to repairability, grippier joysticks and better haptics, and storage options that go up to 1TB. But it still feels very much like its predecessor. This is definitely the best version of the Steam Deck out there, (and one of the best PC gaming handhelds) but I'm not sure you need to upgrade if you're happy with the one you have.

Design and Comfort of Steam Deck OLED

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Giroro
    I still regret that I ever bought a Steam Deck. They're so giant and unwieldy, but they make it look small way smaller than it is in the marketing.
    If they had at least used all that extra space for a bigger and less-crap screen ... that would at least be one less thing to point and laugh at. I think I still wouldn't like it though. It would still feel like gaming on an etch-a-sketch, and still look way too silly to use in public.
    Reply
  • Sluggotg
    With the die shrink, I would think you could Overclock and/or Undervolt to get more performance at the same power draw or longer battery life with the standard performance. Looks like a good refresh of the platform.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I understand what Valve is doing with the Steam Deck, but I'm still a bit disappointed that there won't be one with a decent CPU for a long while.

    I think Qualcomm will likely charge way too much to land in a device like this, but a pure Zen 4c based custom SoC would probably be amazing.

    I like my Ally a lot, but windows is as much a disadvantage as advantage. Valve's hardware control is fantastic on the Deck and much simpler to set than any Windows based handheld.
    Reply
  • P1nky
    There's no way the original Deck had just 167 nits screen! Check your numbers. It should be at least 400, but most people measured it above 500 nits.
    Reply
  • P1nky
    You're the only publication where OLED scored lower FPS than the original. It should be the opposite. Check your numbers.
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    With no real GCN (Polaris&vega apus) support from AMD anymore, steam really needs to get some 8000 chips in there ASAP
    Reply
  • LabRat 891
    digitalgriffin said:
    With no real GCN (Polaris&vega apus) support from AMD anymore, steam really needs to get some 8000 chips in there ASAP
    Unrelated. Steam Deck's been RDNA 2.0 since the start.

    All I want to know, is what parts are 100% swap'able w/ OG Steam Deck.
    The OLED and larger fan is attractive.
    Reply
  • Order 66
    This Steam Deck OLED came out of nowhere for me since I had remember that there wasn't supposed to be any new steam deck models.
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    LabRat 891 said:
    Unrelated. Steam Deck's been RDNA 2.0 since the start.

    All I want to know, is what parts are 100% swap'able w/ OG Steam Deck.
    The OLED and larger fan is attractive.
    Well I learned something new.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    LabRat 891 said:
    All I want to know, is what parts are 100% swap'able w/ OG Steam Deck.
    The OLED and larger fan is attractive.
    I'm not sure much will be, GamersNexus did a teardown and comparison video: 9jhRh11bTRAView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jhRh11bTRA
    Reply