Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super Specs Leaked
The GeForce RTX 40-series, which has given us some of the best graphics cards, will reportedly receive the usual Nvidia "Super" treatment. @Kopite7kimi, a well-known leaker who tends to publish accurate information about Nvidia's upcoming graphics cards, has published possible specifications of Nvidia's GeForce RTX 4080 Super add-in-board as well as some other 'Super'-designated graphics cards. As it turns out, Nvidia is prepping a major GeForce RTX 40-series with at least three 'Super' cards.
Suppose the leaked information is correct, and it ought to have significant accuracy since the formal launch of Nvidia's GeForce RTX 40-series 'Super' lineup is 'weeks away,' according to the source. In that case, the GeForce RTX 4080 Super will indeed run the AD103 graphics processor in its complete configuration with all 10,240 CUDA cores enabled.
In addition, Nvidia allegedly plans the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super and GeForce RTX 4070 Super. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super will supposedly get Nvidia's AD103 GPU with its 48 MB of L2 cache and a 16GB 256-bit GDDR6X memory subsystem, which will significantly increase its performance compared to the original RTX 4070 Ti model. Meanwhile, even the naming of the card looks odd.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 40-Series Super Specifications*
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0
GPU
FP32 CUDA Cores
Memory Configuration
L2 Cache
TBP
MSRP
*GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
AD102
18176 (?)
24GB 384-bit 24 GT/s GDDR6X (?)
?
600W (?)
?
GeForce RTX 4090
AD102
16384
24GB 384-bit 21 GT/s GDDR6X
72 MB
450W
$1,599
*GeForce RTX 4080 Super
AD103
10240
16GB 256-bit 22.4 GT/s GDDR6X
?
?
?
GeForce RTX 4080
AD103
9728
16GB 256-bit 22.4 GT/s GDDR6X
64 MB
320W
$1,199
*GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super
AD103
8448
16GB 256-bit 22.4 GT/s GDDR6X
48 MB
?
?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AD104
7680
12GB 192-bit 21 GT/s GDDR6X
48 MB
285W
$799
*GeForce RTX 4070 Super
AD104
7168
?
48 MB
?
?
GeForce RTX 4070
AD104
5888
12GB 192-bit 21 GT/s GDDR6X
36 MB
200W
$599
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
AD106
4352
8GB or 16GB 128-bit 18 GT/s GDDR6
32 MB
160W
$399/$499
GeForce RTX 4060
AD106
3072
8GB 128-bit 17 GT/s GDDR6
24 MB
115W
$999
*Specifications are unconfirmed.
Even @kopite7kimi does not believe that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super and GeForce RTX 4070 Super will happen.
Meanwhile, considering colossal price and performance gaps in Nvidia's GeForce RTX 40-series lineup, an addition to the family is reasonable. Huge gaps were logical earlier this year to make people buy more expensive options, but at this point, it may make sense to fill these gaps and address gamers who are transitioning from the previous generation of graphics cards.
Yet again, the naming scheme of the supposed new graphics cards looks so off that we would take the information about them with a massive grain of salt.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
Nonstarter. the 80 class for the price and what 500 more cores, it's like 13900k - 14900k. Useless.
The only ones that *might* be palatable at a reasonable price bump would be the 4070s. But it also seems like trying to shoehorn in more SKUs with previously binned parts.
The alleged 4070 Ti Super specs are exactly what I hope for. If that comes true, and at the same price point, I'd be happy to buy that.
The 4080 Super, though... that's just weird to me. If true, there would be six different cards packing the 5,888-10,240 CUDA core range, and then nothing up until the 4090 with 16,384? That's a huge gap. There aren't enough defective AD102 dies to create a new SKU with them? I have trouble believing this.
The alleged 4070 Ti Super specs are exactly what I hope for. If that comes true, and at the same price point, I'd be happy to buy that.
The 4080 Super, though... that's just weird to me. If true, there would be six different cards packing the 5,888-10,240 CUDA core range, and then nothing up until the 4090 with 16,384? That's a huge gap. There aren't enough defective AD102 dies to create a new SKU with them? I have trouble believing this.
The current 4080 is a xx60 class GPU to begin with. Any 70 class from the 4000 series is a 50 class, so no, it's not worth it at any price point. A real 80 class would have been palatable at a midpoint between the current 4080 and 4090 and maybe at $799 max. Of course, if that is all that's on offer then, one does what one must.
The current 4080 is a xx60 class GPU to begin with. Any 70 class from the 4000 series is a 50 class, so no, it's not worth it at any price point. A real 80 class would have been palatable at a midpoint between the current 4080 and 4090 and maybe at $799 max. Of course, if that is all that's on offer then, one does what one must.
Not sure where you been the last few years this is 2023 not 2018.
The 4080 is a XX80 class card not a XX60.
EDIT The main thing that kills the Green Team is the price if your just looking for pure performance without the bit of extra stuff AMD really spanks them for performance per dollar.
