Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 review: $549 price and performance look decent on paper

Given the recent spate of sold-out launches, there's no reason to expect the 5070 to sell at MSRP any time soon.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition looks good on paper, with 20% higher performance than its predecessor and a $549 MSRP. It's a good upgrade, but we can't help but worry retail availability will prove to be just as limited as with other Blackwell GPU launches, meaning the price is likely to climb significantly higher for at least a few months (and probably longer).

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Decent generational performance increase

  • +

    Same theoretical price as the RTX 4070

  • +

    DLSS 4 Transformers, MFG, and other AI features

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Serious concerns with retail pricing and availability

  • -

    Multi-frame generation marketing claims

  • -

    Only 12GB of graphics memory

  • -

    RX 9070 lands tomorrow with 'better' specs

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Introducing the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition has a big hole to fill in the graphics card market. As the first true mainstream offering for the Blackwell RTX 50-series GPUs, it takes over from the discounted RTX 4070 Founders Edition with the same nominal $549 base MSRP. It also has the same 12GB of VRAM and nearly the same number of streaming multiprocessors (SMs) — 48 versus 46 — but with the new Blackwell features. On paper, getting a faster GPU for less money with new features should make this one of the best graphics cards, but we have some concerns.

The biggest problem will no doubt be retail availability and pricing, and we've seen every GPU launch of the past few months sell out almost instantly. From Intel's $249 Arc B580 to the $1,999 RTX 5090, with the RTX 5080 and RTX 5070 Ti filling in the middle, MSRPs have been effectively non-existent. We don't expect the 5070 to buck that trend, and it's all starting to feel a lot like 2021 — just with AI-induced GPU shortages rather than cryptocurrency mining shortages. When will it end? That's a difficult question to answer.

Nvidia posted record earning of $130 billion for the 2025 fiscal year that just ended, more than double its 2024 earnings. Nearly all of the gains came from its AI and data center business, which accounted for 88% of gross revenue. Gaming was a very distant second place at just 8.7% of the total revenue. Nvidia has been saying it's no longer primarily a gaming company for a while now, and nowhere is that more apparent than in the financials.

With massive demand coming from the AI sector, and with limited 5nm-class wafers from TSMC, the simple economics show that it's far more profitable to make data center and AI products right now rather than consumer GPUs. It's not that Nvidia won't order any consumer GPUs, but it's unlikely to be anywhere near sufficient to meet the demand. And in fact, right now virtually every graphics card of the past two years is either sold out or severely overpriced relative to the launch MSRP — with the only exceptions being the RTX 4060, AMD's RX 7600 (the RX 7600 XT currently starts at $430, $100 more than its original MSRP), and Intel's Arc B570.

The prospects for reasonably priced GPUs look grim, in other words. It could be many months before anything gets close to MSRP — and that goes for AMD's RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 that are slated for review tomorrow. We expect those to be just as hard to acquire at MSRP as the RTX 5070, which will officially go on sale tomorrow. But maybe our pessimism will prove misplaced! For now, all we can do is look at the performance and features on tap, and hope that supply will catch up to demand sooner rather than later.

Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Thunder64
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    logainofhades said:
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Which, sadly, has a going price of basically $1000 or so new, or you can take your chances with eBay where prices over the past 30 days are averaging $789.55. Not that I expect the 5070 to be any better in the near term. Minor gains are the new status quo, so 20% faster for nominally the same price as the outgoing generation isn't bad.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.
    I would say the entire 30-series in late 2020 throughout 2021 was, so far, worse than what we've had from the 50-series. RTX 3080 selling for $2000–$2500? RTX 3090 going for up to $4500? Yeah. And you know what? None of that was the fault of Nvidia or AMD.

    The current supply restrictions are much more in Nvidia's control, because it's deciding to prioritize AI over consumer. But I can't fault a company for choosing to do more of the thing that accounted for 88% of its revenue last year.

    Is four stars too high? 🤷‍♂️ That's based on the theoretical MSRP, because GOK what the actual prices are going to be throughout 2025! On paper, everything looks decent. In practice, everything is fubar — and I mean that about all GPUs right now. So writing emotionally vapid comments blaming Nvidia for lack of stock just isn't something I'm going to bother doing. Yes, the supply situation sucks right now. Prices suck right now. You can't buy these at $549 right now (unless you win the lottery). But if you could buy one at that price? Sure, it's a 4-star card, maybe 3.5-star. And getting bent out of shape about a half a star difference of opinion isn't worth the effort.

    Put another way: Read the review, look at all the pretty charts, decide for yourself how good/bad/whatever the card is. But don't get hung up on one number that tries (and always fails) to encapsulate way too much information.
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    LMAO decent price!!!! And he even omitted direct comparison with the 4070 Super!!!!! Hahaha what a joke, this is the most n greed shill website in the whole world

    throwback when this same guy said 4070>6950 at same price 😂 this is comedy. Can't wait to see the 9070 "review" tomorrow where he will try and fail to make it look bad compared to this failure
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    I get where you're coming from, and if the 9000 series had launched first, i would have some real issues with that score. But the 9000 series hasn't launched yet, the market is a mess with pricing all over the place, and the RTX 4070 Super and 7900 GRE basically no longer exist in retail. Given the space this card has launched into, if it can be had at MSRP, it's appropriate. Do I love it? No. But looking at it outside of a bubble, until there are more competing products, it's not the worst thing. It could definitely use more vram though.

    As for the worst GPU launch ever, nah, we tend to forget just how bad the GeForce FX 5000 and GTX 400 launches were. I'm tempted to throw the Radeon HD 2000 series in there, but they at least typically made it through their warranty period before they would outright die. This could not be said for the flagships from those other two series, the HD 2000 series was just hot, loud, and not very competitive. That said, is this the worst launch in 15 years? Undoubtedly.
    Reply
  • baboma
    >This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars?

    No surprise. 5070 is getting special attention because of Huang's "5070 > 4090" CES blurb that had the cognoscenti gnashing their teeth. The throng is itching for payback, and this is their chance.

    >What a joke.

    Yes, it's a joke that people are crying about overpriced GPUs, when the price of everything else had just jumped 25% overnight.

    >Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.

    Famous last words.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    This is the first review I've read, and I'd have to say that was an unexpectedly poor result.
    Leaving out the 4070S was on purpose(probably on urging from someone who provided the hardware for testing, we can guess who), no doubt because that was what it needed to stand up to and be compared with and I knew I was not alone seeing that omitted as glaringly telling.
    I'm not sure it really matters, because there will not be any real availability of note probably until the 5070S is close to release.
    MSRP? haha, that's the real joke.
    Reply
  • DRagor
    btmedic04 said:
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    You forgot about fake ROPs
    Reply