Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 review: $549 price and performance look decent on paper

Given the recent spate of sold-out launches, there's no reason to expect the 5070 to sell at MSRP any time soon.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia RTX 5070 Founders Edition: Content Creation, Professional Apps, and AI

Modern GPUs like the RTX 5070 aren't just about gaming. They're used for video encoding and professional applications, and increasingly, they're being used for AI. We've revamped our professional and AI test suite to give a more detailed look at the various GPUs. We'll start with the AI benchmarks, as those tend to be more important for a wider range of users.

Procyon has multiple AI tests, and we've run the AI Vision benchmark along with two different Stable Diffusion image generation tests. The tests have several variants available that are all determined to be roughly equivalent (in output) by UL: OpenVINO (Intel), TensorRT (Nvidia), and DirectML (for everything, but mostly AMD). There are also options for FP32, FP16, and INT8 data types, which can give different results. We tested the available options and used the best result for each GPU.

Procyon has finally received the necessary update to run the TensorRT workloads on Blackwell 50-series GPUs. As we've seen in some of the other test results, the 5070 FE ranks about 20% ahead of the 4070 in Stable Diffusion, but still comes in clearly behind the 4070 Ti. It's also quite a bit faster than any AMD GPU at present, but we'll have to see if RDNA 4 can change that tomorrow.

The AI Vision test received some updates to the CUDA code that clearly boosted performance on the 50-series GPUs, but it seems we'll need to retest the 40-series cards as their results now appear outdated.

ML Commons' MLPerf Client 0.5 test suite does AI text generation in response to a variety of inputs. There are four different tests, all using the LLaMa 2 7B model, and the benchmark measures the time to first token (how fast a response starts appearing) and the tokens per second after the first token. These are combined using a geometric mean for the overall scores, which we report here.

While AMD, Intel, and Nvidia are all ML Commons partners and were involved with creating and validating the benchmark, it doesn't seem to be quite as vendor-agnostic as we would like. AMD and Nvidia GPUs only have a DirectML execution path, while Intel has both DirectML and OpenVINO as options. Intel's Arc GPUs score quite a bit higher with OpenVINO than with DirectML.

The RTX 5070 beats the 4070 Ti here, but comes in just behind the 7900 XT in tokens per second. The time to first token on the other hand strongly favors the Nvidia GPUs.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition performance charts

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

We'll have some additional SPECworkstation 4.0 results below, but there's an AI inference test composed of ResNet50 and SuperResolution workloads that runs on GPUs (and potentially NPUs, though we haven't tested that). We calculate the geometric mean of the four results given in inferences per second, which isn't an official SPEC score but it's more useful for our purposes.

The RTX 5070 again beats the RTX 4070 Ti, along with squeaking past the RX 7900 XTX. Even without using FP4, it looks like Blackwell does better in some of the AI workloads than Ada.

For our professional application tests, we'll start with Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, which has support for Nvidia Optix, Intel OneAPI, and AMD HIP libraries. Those aren't necessarily equivalent in terms of the level of optimizations, but each represents the fastest way to run Blender on a particular GPU at present.

The RTX 5070 delivers 22% better performance than the RTX 4070 in our Blender geomean score, edging past the 4070 Ti again. AMD's GPUs again fall quite a bit behind the pace set by Nvidia for this ray tracing workload.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition performance charts

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

SPECworkstation 4.0 has two other test suites that are of interest in terms of GPU performance. The first is the video transcoding test using HandBrake, a measure of the video engines on the different GPUs and something that can be useful for content creation work. We use the average of the 4K to 4K and 4K to 1080p scores. Note that this only evaluates speed of encoding, not image fidelity.

The RTX 5070 has the same video encoding block as the other Blackwell GPUs, though clock speeds can vary slightly. It looks like the 5070 clocks higher than the 5070 Ti in this particular test, and the Blackwell GPUs are slightly faster than the Ada cards. AMD's 7000-series GPUs all deliver nearly identical performance, though it's worth pointing out that this is purely the speed of encoding. Our GPU encoding tests indicated AMD had significantly lower image fidelity — something RDNA 4 is supposed to finally address.

Our final professional app tests consist of SPECworkstation 4.0's viewport graphics suite. This is basically the same tests as SPECviewperf 2020, only updated to the latest versions. (Also, Siemen's NX isn't part of the suite.) There are seven individual application tests, and we've combined the scores from each into an unofficial overall score using a geometric mean.

The RTX 5070 comes in second to last out of the tested GPUs in the viewport rankings, only beating the RTX 4070 — as it should. AMD's drivers for its consumer cards tend to be more friendly toward these professional applications, which is why the 7800 XT and above beat the Nvidia GPUs.

These AI and professional tests are ultimately just one aspect of GPU performance, and if you only care about gaming they shouldn't exert much influence on your choice of GPU. That's especially true of the professional tests. AI could become something useful even for gaming, maybe, but higher Blender performance will only matter if you're actually using Blender for 3D modeling.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Thunder64
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    logainofhades said:
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Which, sadly, has a going price of basically $1000 or so new, or you can take your chances with eBay where prices over the past 30 days are averaging $789.55. Not that I expect the 5070 to be any better in the near term. Minor gains are the new status quo, so 20% faster for nominally the same price as the outgoing generation isn't bad.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.
    I would say the entire 30-series in late 2020 throughout 2021 was, so far, worse than what we've had from the 50-series. RTX 3080 selling for $2000–$2500? RTX 3090 going for up to $4500? Yeah. And you know what? None of that was the fault of Nvidia or AMD.

    The current supply restrictions are much more in Nvidia's control, because it's deciding to prioritize AI over consumer. But I can't fault a company for choosing to do more of the thing that accounted for 88% of its revenue last year.

    Is four stars too high? 🤷‍♂️ That's based on the theoretical MSRP, because GOK what the actual prices are going to be throughout 2025! On paper, everything looks decent. In practice, everything is fubar — and I mean that about all GPUs right now. So writing emotionally vapid comments blaming Nvidia for lack of stock just isn't something I'm going to bother doing. Yes, the supply situation sucks right now. Prices suck right now. You can't buy these at $549 right now (unless you win the lottery). But if you could buy one at that price? Sure, it's a 4-star card, maybe 3.5-star. And getting bent out of shape about a half a star difference of opinion isn't worth the effort.

    Put another way: Read the review, look at all the pretty charts, decide for yourself how good/bad/whatever the card is. But don't get hung up on one number that tries (and always fails) to encapsulate way too much information.
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    LMAO decent price!!!! And he even omitted direct comparison with the 4070 Super!!!!! Hahaha what a joke, this is the most n greed shill website in the whole world

    throwback when this same guy said 4070>6950 at same price 😂 this is comedy. Can't wait to see the 9070 "review" tomorrow where he will try and fail to make it look bad compared to this failure
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    I get where you're coming from, and if the 9000 series had launched first, i would have some real issues with that score. But the 9000 series hasn't launched yet, the market is a mess with pricing all over the place, and the RTX 4070 Super and 7900 GRE basically no longer exist in retail. Given the space this card has launched into, if it can be had at MSRP, it's appropriate. Do I love it? No. But looking at it outside of a bubble, until there are more competing products, it's not the worst thing. It could definitely use more vram though.

    As for the worst GPU launch ever, nah, we tend to forget just how bad the GeForce FX 5000 and GTX 400 launches were. I'm tempted to throw the Radeon HD 2000 series in there, but they at least typically made it through their warranty period before they would outright die. This could not be said for the flagships from those other two series, the HD 2000 series was just hot, loud, and not very competitive. That said, is this the worst launch in 15 years? Undoubtedly.
    Reply
  • baboma
    >This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars?

    No surprise. 5070 is getting special attention because of Huang's "5070 > 4090" CES blurb that had the cognoscenti gnashing their teeth. The throng is itching for payback, and this is their chance.

    >What a joke.

    Yes, it's a joke that people are crying about overpriced GPUs, when the price of everything else had just jumped 25% overnight.

    >Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.

    Famous last words.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    This is the first review I've read, and I'd have to say that was an unexpectedly poor result.
    Leaving out the 4070S was on purpose(probably on urging from someone who provided the hardware for testing, we can guess who), no doubt because that was what it needed to stand up to and be compared with and I knew I was not alone seeing that omitted as glaringly telling.
    I'm not sure it really matters, because there will not be any real availability of note probably until the 5070S is close to release.
    MSRP? haha, that's the real joke.
    Reply
  • DRagor
    btmedic04 said:
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    You forgot about fake ROPs
    Reply