Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 vs Intel Arc B580 Face Off: $249 graphics cards duke it out for budget gaming supremacy

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 vs Intel Arc B580 Face Off
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Back when Intel's Arc B580 graphics card launched about a year ago, it was one of the only options in town for folks who wanted a truly modern GPU for less than $300. Supply and demand apparently didn't balance out, however, because the B580 consistently sold for much more than its $249 list price for many months.

Now that Nvidia's GeForce RTX 5050 has arrived at a $249 MSRP (and you can find RX 9060 XT 8GB cards for well under $300), the B580 faces some stiff competition - and it's readily been available from stock for that same $249 of late.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jeffrey Kampman
Senior Analyst, Graphics

As the Senior Analyst, Graphics at Tom's Hardware, Jeff Kampman covers everything that has to do with graphics cards, gaming performance, and more. From integrated graphics processors to discrete graphics cards to the hyperscale installations powering our AI future, if it's got a GPU in it, Jeff is on it. 

  • Crazyy8
    The difference is small enough between the two that people are going to buy the RTX 5050, turn on DLSS Quality, and get the same or better performance as the B580 with virtually the same image quality. The RTX 5050 can even use higher DLSS modes or 4xFG and get "4090 performance, at $259********". Plus, you are guaranteed a decade or more of driver support, CUDA, blender and other application comparability, DLSS updates, et cetera, AND Nvidia is a name brand in the GPU market.

    Things aren't looking so good for Intel right now, if you buy Intel you risk driver support ending earlier than Nvidia, more so if Intel flops further in the GPU and CPU market. Their DLSS isn't as good as Nvidia's, worse frame gen, no cuda, worse AI support/performance, et cetera++++++.

    All of this isn't even accounting for the soon to be rising GPU cost due to RAM/DRAM shortage.
    The only thing going for Intel is the fact they have better raw performance than Nvidia while being such a new player, but that isn't really hard considering the state of Nvidia's budget lineup.

    I hope Intel can compete against Nvidia, but I don't see many people buying Intel's GPUs for now.
    Reply
  • Marlin1975
    So B580 better for gaming but a bunch of other stuff, most do not care about, goes to Nvidia.
    OK... got it.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    If I was forced to buy an 8gb GPU, I would spend the extra $25 and get an RX 9060xt. While improvements have been made, the B580 still suffers from CPU overhead issues.

    PCPartPicker Part List
    Video Card: Gigabyte GAMING OC Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB Video Card ($274.99 @ Amazon)
    Total: $274.99
    Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
    Generated by PCPartPicker 2025-11-25 14:01 EST-0500
    Reply
  • Gururu
    It's interesting that I must be the only one that runs 1440 high settings exclusively since I purchased the B580. Never even tried 1080. If the 5050 is good at 1440 too, then we should see these tests because I suspect a lot of people will be doing 1440 on these cards.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    logainofhades said:
    If I was forced to buy an 8gb GPU, I would spend the extra $25 and get an RX 9060xt. While improvements have been made, the B580 still suffers from CPU overhead issues.

    PCPartPicker Part List
    Video Card: Gigabyte GAMING OC Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB Video Card ($274.99 @ Amazon)
    Total: $274.99
    Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
    Generated by PCPartPicker 2025-11-25 14:01 EST-0500
    Iam at same boat... with the new steam machine using a 8gb gpu I think all games will be made thinking on that.
    the 9060xt with 8gb it's now gold
    Reply
  • scottsoapbox
    Gururu said:
    It's interesting that I must be the only one that runs 1440 high settings exclusively since I purchased the B580. Never even tried 1080. If the 5050 is good at 1440 too, then we should see these tests because I suspect a lot of people will be doing 1440 on these cards.
    Do you play older games or not mind lower frame rates?

    Also, there are 1440p and 4K results.
    Reply
  • scottsoapbox
    Amdlova said:
    Iam at same boat... with the new steam machine using a 8gb gpu I think all games will be made thinking on that.
    the 9060xt with 8gb it's now gold
    No game developers will care about the steam machine until it sells at least 10 million units.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    Gururu said:
    It's interesting that I must be the only one that runs 1440 high settings exclusively since I purchased the B580. Never even tried 1080. If the 5050 is good at 1440 too, then we should see these tests because I suspect a lot of people will be doing 1440 on these cards.
    Well, it also highly depends on what games you are playing. And in your case, because you have a very strong CPU, you would be maxing out the card. Users in this tier of GPU won't have such strong systems/CPUs to really push FPS.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Marlin1975 said:
    So B580 better for gaming but a bunch of other stuff, most do not care about, goes to Nvidia.
    OK... got it.
    More like: B580 barely faster at native gaming tests, but once you factor in DLSS and drivers and everything else, that marginal lead evaporates. Intel had about a five month gap where it could have made inroads, but B580 supply and pricing at the time were poor. Now that the cards are available, Nvidia has an updated architecture that swings the needle back toward its GPU.
    Gururu said:
    It's interesting that I must be the only one that runs 1440 high settings exclusively since I purchased the B580. Never even tried 1080. If the 5050 is good at 1440 too, then we should see these tests because I suspect a lot of people will be doing 1440 on these cards.
    Painting with a broad stroke, 1440p high tends to be very similar in relative performance to 1080p ultra. Doing both 1440p high testing and 1080p ultra testing ends up doubling the amount of tests for very little additional insight. At some point, you need to crop out tests that just take too much time and focus on a subset of performance. I did 1080p medium testing to throw out one more data point, but I totally understand the desire to trim the fat and only do ultra tests.

    PS: @Jeff Kampman I am very happy to see that my charts and tables are still being used! Hopefully they're helpful and aren't getting in the way.
    :)
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Gururu said:
    It's interesting that I must be the only one that runs 1440 high settings exclusively since I purchased the B580. Never even tried 1080. If the 5050 is good at 1440 too, then we should see these tests because I suspect a lot of people will be doing 1440 on these cards.
    I like to go 4k when the game has XeSS. Like Indiana Jones with XeSS balanced.
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Well, it also highly depends on what games you are playing. And in your case, because you have a very strong CPU, you would be maxing out the card. Users in this tier of GPU won't have such strong systems/CPUs to really push FPS.
    Gamers Nexus does tests that max out the GPU and they found that no CPU bottleneck exists. Do you think most would max out the GPU with a B580 or 5050? Also by "very strong" do you mean Alder Lake or Zen 3 with 6c, because those are strong enough to make the CPU bottleneck in realistic use scenarios go poof.
    m9uK4D35FlM:1032View: https://youtu.be/m9uK4D35FlM?t=1032

    I wouldn't call my 13600k that I use with my B580 "very strong" but at least it is wildly out of the range of potentially being a CPU bottleneck at the best image quality I can get at 60 fps. As opposed to a stock Ryzen 2600 that is flat out incapable of 60 fps in many modern games with a 5090.
    Reply