AMD is unfazed by Panther Lake's big integrated GPU — 'It's not even a fair fight' to compare the Arc B390 to Strix Halo, AMD exec claims
AMD also hints that Panther Lake's price point won't be pretty
Tom's Hardware sat down with AMD's SVP and GM of Client Product Group, Rahul Tikoo, at CES 2026 in Las Vegas, Nevada, to get AMD's response surrounding Intel's new speedy Panther Lake mobile CPUs. Tikoo revealed that AMD is not afraid of Intel's new chips, claiming its lineup of high-performance Ryzen AI Max (Strix Halo) APUs and mainstream Ryzen AI series chips fulfill the market's needs more effectively.
Tikoo said that Intel's Panther Lake competition isn't anything for AMD to worry about. "Strix Halo, or Ryzen AI Max will kill it. [...] It's not even a fair fight at that point, because it's discrete-level graphics." the exec remarked. He said that AMD is in the most optimal position possible in the market, and that the company is meeting market demands better by providing two distinctly different lines of chips that provide very specific performance requirements for the demands of power users/prosumers and mainstream consumers.
"...And then, our strategy, okay, Strix Halo [and] Ryzen AI Max competes against that (Panther Lake 12 Xe), and it's better than that in terms of graphics performance, all of that. And then, for the mainstream of the market, that don't value that much graphics [power], because honestly, most of the people that are using Notebooks, that are outside of the creator or gaming spaces are, you know, they don't need that graphics performance."
Tikoo clarified that he believes shoppers will make decisions based on their needs, rather than looking for a chip that can do a little bit of everything.
"...So, like, people make choices, right? When they go into this space, they're like, Okay, here's the applications I'm using... or here's the gaming I'm doing."
The AMD lead also didn't miss the chance to jab Intel a bit, noting how Intel did not add any Strix Halo APU models into its benchmark comparisons — limiting its benchmarking runs strictly to its lower-end Ryzen AI series chip and its own previous-generation chips.
"There's a reason why they didn't compare it right there. [...] they compared their highest-end to our midpoint." He also subtly exposed that Intel's pricing for Panther Lake won't be pretty: "And, oh, by the way, that 12 Xe [Panther Lake]... Wait until you see the price point on that. It's gonna be, you know. Enough said."
Panther Lake is Intel's latest and most powerful mobile CPU platform to date, built on its new 18A process node, with high-performance Cougar Cove P-cores, Darkmount E-cores, and Intel's highly potent Xe3 integrated graphics engine. The flagship Core Ultra X9 388H comes with 16 cores in total (four P-cores, eight E-cores, and four LP-cores), 18MB of L3 cache, Arc B390 iGPU with 12 Xe cores, and support for up to 96GB of LPDDR5x-9600 memory.
Intel's slides claim that the X9 388H packs 10% more performance for the same power as the previous-gen Arrow Lake-H Ultra 9 285H, and 60% more performance in the same metric as Intel's Lunar Lake Ultra 9 288V. Intel claims the Arc B390-equipped X9 388H is 77% faster on average than the Ultra 9 288V in gaming tests. Intel's new Xe3 iGPU flagship is so fast, in fact, that Intel claims the X9 388H gets roughly similar performance to an Nvidia RTX 4050 laptop GPU in most games at a 60W sustained power envelope, with the X9 388H operating at just 45W sustained.
If you want a better perspective, Intel's Xe3 B390 iGPU was able to pull off 80 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p high settings with XeSS set to Balanced mode in our hands-on testing.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
- Jake RoachSenior Analyst, CPUs
-
redgarl The 388h will be the flagship CPU for Nvidia GPUs anyway. You will never use the iGPU unless it is used as an APU, which Nvidia will not be thrilled about since they need those for their mobile GPUs.Reply
If only Nvidia didn't force OEMs to use Intel CPUs for their GPUs... /SARCASM -
thestryker I am curious what Strix Halo at the 45W-65W range that PTL will run in laptops looks like. What I've seen of the handhelds indicates they're anywhere from 1.5-2.5x faster than LNL at ~20W. While Strix Halo certainly scales a lot more I think the performance in that power range may end up a lot closer than AMD would probably like.Reply
I imagine the PTL SKUs with 4 Xe3 cores will be the most common across the board. They'll also be in several of the thin/power limited gaming segments. It seems like ARL HX SKUs will continue to be used for the "high end" gaming segment.
The top PTL SKU probably won't be very common much like the LNL ones. There will be plenty of other options in more affordable SKUs. -
usertests I don't see how Panther Lake won't win in power limited handhelds and efficiency generally. That's where having a ~2 node advantage comes in handy.Reply
Strix Halo requires about 20-25W before it takes off from Strix Point. Any handheld with Panther Lake should be superior. I will be surprised if this is not the finding from reviewers.
As for pricing vs. Strix Point, Panther Lake 10/12 Xe core chips could be more expensive, but Strix/Gorgon Point prices need to go down, and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 should be reasonably priced to take on B390 and 5050/5060 laptops. Just include 32 GB LPDDR5X so it's not an AI-oriented product. -
Notton Reply
No, if you were a laptop designer, you wouldn't use the X9 388H for a laptop that has a dGPU because the X-prefix CPUs have cut down PCIe lanes.redgarl said:The 388h will be the flagship CPU for Nvidia GPUs anyway. You will never use the iGPU unless it is used as an APU, which Nvidia will not be thrilled about since they need those for their mobile GPUs.
If only Nvidia didn't force OEMs to use Intel CPUs for their GPUs... /SARCASM
More specifically
X9 388H: 4x PCIe 5.0 / 8x PCIe 4.0
386H: 12x PCIe 5.0 / 8x PCIe 4.0
All RTX50 mobile dGPUs run off of at least 8x PCIe 5.0 lanes, unless you want to starve them of PCIe bandwidth.
Techpowerup suggests they are all 16x cards, but I doubt that info is accurate, especially with the 5050m/5060m.
I'm not saying it's impossible to combine an X9 388H with an RTX 5090m, but it wouldn't make sense. -
watzupken I don't think flagship Panther Lake chips will be cheap, but neither are AMD's Strix Point and Halo. It's unlikely the iGPU on the Intel chip to be as fast as the Strix Halo, but if Intel can price it between the flagship Strix Point and Strix Halo offerings, it's going to hurt AMD.Reply -
bolweval "...And then, our strategy, okay, Strix Halo Ryzen AI Max competes against that (Panther Lake 12 Xe), and it's better than that in terms of graphics performance, all of that. And then, for the mainstream of the market, that don't value that much graphics , because honestly, most of the people that are using Notebooks, that are outside of the creator or gaming spaces are, you know, they don't need that graphics performance."Reply
Almost sounds like he's trying to convince himself... -
KevinS1010 I believe Panter Lake will destroy AMD this time, both in terms of performance and battery life. Serves them right for still betting on an RDNA3.5 APU.Reply -
irish_adam Reply
While Strix Halo is quite expensive it's also a "halo" product without peer so of course it's expensive. All of that expense isn't just AMD's fault either as there's only really 2 mobile products out that use it, one tablet and one laptop so the OEMs can also charge a large premium as they have a monopoly on those chips. The chips are made on 4nm which is now an older node making it cheaper to produce so AMD have a lot of margin to play with.watzupken said:I don't think flagship Panther Lake chips will be cheap, but neither are AMD's Strix Point and Halo. It's unlikely the iGPU on the Intel chip to be as fast as the Strix Halo, but if Intel can price it between the flagship Strix Point and Strix Halo offerings, it's going to hurt AMD.
Panther lake on the other hand is on a cutting edge node with questionable yields, it will definitely cost Intel more to produce these chips. Intel is hardly flush with cash so it cannot afford to keep pumping out expensive products and selling them cheap which they have been forced to do in recent years.
That being said I am excited to see the benchmarks come in for Panther Lake as it does look like Intel's first decent offering in a while. Though with global ram prices being what they are and will be this year Panther Lake could be a complete flop through no fault of it's own. -
TerryLaze Reply
All their products are cheap, compared to AMD, they only use half the amount of full (ie expensive) cores and don't use any x3d or other things that would increase price.irish_adam said:Intel is hardly flush with cash so it cannot afford to keep pumping out expensive products and selling them cheap which they have been forced to do in recent years.
What they did in recent years is to pay TSMC their headroom which is what AMD is forced to always do.
It's going to hurt AMD either way, even if it's just because they used to be the monopoly on APUs with good GPU performance.watzupken said:I don't think flagship Panther Lake chips will be cheap, but neither are AMD's Strix Point and Halo. It's unlikely the iGPU on the Intel chip to be as fast as the Strix Halo, but if Intel can price it between the flagship Strix Point and Strix Halo offerings, it's going to hurt AMD.
Now every other (prob more) handheld will be intel, if not future consoles even, since selling consoles below cost has pretty much ended.