Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 review: $549 price and performance look decent on paper

Given the recent spate of sold-out launches, there's no reason to expect the 5070 to sell at MSRP any time soon.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia RTX 5070 Founders Edition Full RT and DLSS 4 Testing (Coming later...)

As we've said in other recent reviews, there's a lot of other testing we want to conduct, but we've been short on time for the past month or more it feels like. We'll run the RTX 5070 and some other GPUs through some games that support DLSS 4 in the coming days, after the 9070-series launch. The tests will be similar to our DLSS 4, MFG, and full RT 5080 and 5090 benchmarks, but with a few additional games perhaps.

We'll discuss things in more detail once we have more numbers. Until then, here's the short recap of Multi Frame Generation. It's a key element in Nvidia's performance claims for the entire Blackwell family of GPUs, and the results — if taken purely at face value — can be highly misleading.

YouTube YouTube
Watch On

Above, you can see a video in which Bryan Catanzaro, Nvidia's VP of Applied Deep Learning Research, discusses the changes to DLSS 4. Some changes only affect the RTX 50-series GPUs while others apply to all RTX cards. DLSS upscaling is one that gets changed for everything with a new Transformers algorithm.

The short summary is that DLSS Transformers are more computationally intensive but yield better image quality results. We've played around with Cyberpunk 2077 and feel there's more to this than just marketing hype. Even with the Balanced and Performance modes, DLSS Transformers can still look very good at 4K. It could actually deliver on Nvidia's "better than native" claims for DLSS.

What about Multi Frame Generation is a different can of worms. As the name implies, it generates multiple frames rather than interpolating just one. It can run in three modes: 2X (generate a single frame), 3X (generate two frames), and 4X (generate three frames). In principle, it's a lot like the original framegen, just with more generated frames.

It takes two input images plus motion vectors and depth buffers and works to generate high-quality intermediate frames. In practice, there are some big changes compared to DLSS 3 on the RTX 40-series. MFG runs off the Blackwell tensor cores. We don't know if that means it can leverage the FP4 number format, but that would make sense. The OFA in the 40-series was a fixed function unit, and Nvidia apparently has reached the point where it can do better framegen via a software algorithm running a new AI model than by the old OFA. The new tensor-based framegen also runs faster than the OFA variant, even on an RTX 40-series GPU (or at least on the RTX 4090).

Nvidia Neural Rendering deep dive

(Image credit: Nvidia)

There are around 75 games and applications that are DLSS 4 enabled, according to Nvidia, either with native support or via Nvidia App overrides. (Nearly all of them are via the Nvidia App right now.) You can use the new DLSS Transformers model to get improved image quality, with a slight hit to performance relative to the previously existing DLSS CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models but with higher image quality. The performance hit does vary by the generation of hardware, however, and we expect transformers will run quite a bit slower than the CNN model on the 30- and 20-series RTX cards.

MFG now has native support in several games, including the latest 2.2.1 Cyberpunk 2077 patch, Alan Wake 2, and Hogwarts Legacy. We still need to test the 5070 Ti (and previous generation cards it replaces), so we'll hold off on any charts or analysis right now. But what we know of MFG from the 5080 and 5090 suggests it's not going to be a universal win.

In our view, MFG basically needs at least 30 FPS for rendered performance, and 40+ FPS is better, with MFG either doubling, tripling, or quadrupling that. But it does necessarily scale perfectly, often getting more like 75% better for each additional generated frame. At the same time, delays are introduced, and depending on the game, user, and controller of choice, the final result can be better or worse than the non-framegen / non-MFG experience.

The resulting output on your monitor generally looks smoother, but it doesn't necessarily feel that much better. The 5080, for example, got 36 FPS with 4K RT-Overdrive and DLSS Quality Transformers. Turning on MFG bumped that to 66, 95, and 122 FPS, with input sampling happening at 33, 32, and 31 FPS, respectively. That means responsiveness got worse at each level while the frame smoothing got better.

What happens with a slower GPU like the RTX 5070 Founders Edition? The starting FPS will be lower, which means it's more likely to have results where it will need higher levels of upscaling to reach acceptable performance levels. In some cases a game might feel like it's running worse than before, even though the reported FPS is higher. So, check back and we'll update this section with more details.

More to come....

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Thunder64
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    logainofhades said:
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Which, sadly, has a going price of basically $1000 or so new, or you can take your chances with eBay where prices over the past 30 days are averaging $789.55. Not that I expect the 5070 to be any better in the near term. Minor gains are the new status quo, so 20% faster for nominally the same price as the outgoing generation isn't bad.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.
    I would say the entire 30-series in late 2020 throughout 2021 was, so far, worse than what we've had from the 50-series. RTX 3080 selling for $2000–$2500? RTX 3090 going for up to $4500? Yeah. And you know what? None of that was the fault of Nvidia or AMD.

    The current supply restrictions are much more in Nvidia's control, because it's deciding to prioritize AI over consumer. But I can't fault a company for choosing to do more of the thing that accounted for 88% of its revenue last year.

    Is four stars too high? 🤷‍♂️ That's based on the theoretical MSRP, because GOK what the actual prices are going to be throughout 2025! On paper, everything looks decent. In practice, everything is fubar — and I mean that about all GPUs right now. So writing emotionally vapid comments blaming Nvidia for lack of stock just isn't something I'm going to bother doing. Yes, the supply situation sucks right now. Prices suck right now. You can't buy these at $549 right now (unless you win the lottery). But if you could buy one at that price? Sure, it's a 4-star card, maybe 3.5-star. And getting bent out of shape about a half a star difference of opinion isn't worth the effort.

    Put another way: Read the review, look at all the pretty charts, decide for yourself how good/bad/whatever the card is. But don't get hung up on one number that tries (and always fails) to encapsulate way too much information.
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    LMAO decent price!!!! And he even omitted direct comparison with the 4070 Super!!!!! Hahaha what a joke, this is the most n greed shill website in the whole world

    throwback when this same guy said 4070>6950 at same price 😂 this is comedy. Can't wait to see the 9070 "review" tomorrow where he will try and fail to make it look bad compared to this failure
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    I get where you're coming from, and if the 9000 series had launched first, i would have some real issues with that score. But the 9000 series hasn't launched yet, the market is a mess with pricing all over the place, and the RTX 4070 Super and 7900 GRE basically no longer exist in retail. Given the space this card has launched into, if it can be had at MSRP, it's appropriate. Do I love it? No. But looking at it outside of a bubble, until there are more competing products, it's not the worst thing. It could definitely use more vram though.

    As for the worst GPU launch ever, nah, we tend to forget just how bad the GeForce FX 5000 and GTX 400 launches were. I'm tempted to throw the Radeon HD 2000 series in there, but they at least typically made it through their warranty period before they would outright die. This could not be said for the flagships from those other two series, the HD 2000 series was just hot, loud, and not very competitive. That said, is this the worst launch in 15 years? Undoubtedly.
    Reply
  • baboma
    >This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars?

    No surprise. 5070 is getting special attention because of Huang's "5070 > 4090" CES blurb that had the cognoscenti gnashing their teeth. The throng is itching for payback, and this is their chance.

    >What a joke.

    Yes, it's a joke that people are crying about overpriced GPUs, when the price of everything else had just jumped 25% overnight.

    >Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.

    Famous last words.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    This is the first review I've read, and I'd have to say that was an unexpectedly poor result.
    Leaving out the 4070S was on purpose(probably on urging from someone who provided the hardware for testing, we can guess who), no doubt because that was what it needed to stand up to and be compared with and I knew I was not alone seeing that omitted as glaringly telling.
    I'm not sure it really matters, because there will not be any real availability of note probably until the 5070S is close to release.
    MSRP? haha, that's the real joke.
    Reply
  • DRagor
    btmedic04 said:
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    You forgot about fake ROPs
    Reply