Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 review: $549 price and performance look decent on paper

Given the recent spate of sold-out launches, there's no reason to expect the 5070 to sell at MSRP any time soon.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Nvidia's special environmentally friendly packaging program continues with the RTX 5070 Founders Edition. Recycled materials and no ink make for an interesting if somewhat boring looking box. But it's what's inside that counts.

Nvidia's RTX 50-series Founders Edition cards are all dual-slot designs, but that's far easier to manage with a 250W TGP model like the RTX 5070 — the RTX 5090 packing a 575W TGP into a dual-slot chassis is far more impressive. The 5070 has smaller fans but otherwise follows the same design language as its bigger siblings.

There are two fans, measuring just 90 mm (maybe 91mm), compared to the 110 mm fans on the 5080/5090 cards. The card dimensions are also more compact, at 243x109x33 mm. It's still moderately heavy, however, weighing in at 1155g — not a welterweight, then.

Given the smaller dimensions and lower power requirements, the RTX 5070 FE doesn't use the double flow through design that Nvidia touted on the RTX 5090 and 5080 FE models. The back fan (away from the IO) does have a flow through design, while the front fan (near the IO) vents out the IO bracket. Which means the radiator fins opposite the fan near the IO bracket are more for appearances rather than actually being useful. (The RTX 4070 as an example just had a flat cover in the same location.)

There's also no RGB lighting to speak of, unlike the 5090 and 5080. That's also in keeping with Nvidia's tradition on the lower tier Founders Edition cards — the 4070 Super, 4070, and 4060 Ti FE models were all unlit in terms of LEDs. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but if you like the bling, you might want to look elsewhere.

Display outputs follow the standard with three DisplayPort 2.1a and a single HDMI 2.1b. The DP outputs are all full UHBR20 (80 Gbps) capable, though do note that 80 Gbps cables tend to be very short at present — 1.2m or less.

As with every Founders Edition card going back to the RTX 30-series, Nvidia opts to not use native 8-pin power connections. Instead, you get a 16-pin 12V-2x6 connector, angled so that the cable doesn't stick straight up (which looks nicer but can be more difficult to disconnect), with a 16-pin to dual 8-pin adapter. The adapter has a much larger plastic shroud around the 16-pin connector, making it far easier to remove from the card; typical direct 16-pin cables from a PSU are a different story.

Melting connectors shouldn't be a problem for the RTX 5070, considering the 16-pin connector only needs to carry up to 250W of power. The 8-pin to 16-pin adapter features the same flexible individually sleeved cables as the 5080/5090, but with only two 8-pin connections.

In general, its a nice looking minimalist design that should work well even in compact cases. But enough talk; let's get to the benchmarks. We know that's what you're really here to see (and probably just skipped this whole page).

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Thunder64
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    logainofhades said:
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Which, sadly, has a going price of basically $1000 or so new, or you can take your chances with eBay where prices over the past 30 days are averaging $789.55. Not that I expect the 5070 to be any better in the near term. Minor gains are the new status quo, so 20% faster for nominally the same price as the outgoing generation isn't bad.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.
    I would say the entire 30-series in late 2020 throughout 2021 was, so far, worse than what we've had from the 50-series. RTX 3080 selling for $2000–$2500? RTX 3090 going for up to $4500? Yeah. And you know what? None of that was the fault of Nvidia or AMD.

    The current supply restrictions are much more in Nvidia's control, because it's deciding to prioritize AI over consumer. But I can't fault a company for choosing to do more of the thing that accounted for 88% of its revenue last year.

    Is four stars too high? 🤷‍♂️ That's based on the theoretical MSRP, because GOK what the actual prices are going to be throughout 2025! On paper, everything looks decent. In practice, everything is fubar — and I mean that about all GPUs right now. So writing emotionally vapid comments blaming Nvidia for lack of stock just isn't something I'm going to bother doing. Yes, the supply situation sucks right now. Prices suck right now. You can't buy these at $549 right now (unless you win the lottery). But if you could buy one at that price? Sure, it's a 4-star card, maybe 3.5-star. And getting bent out of shape about a half a star difference of opinion isn't worth the effort.

    Put another way: Read the review, look at all the pretty charts, decide for yourself how good/bad/whatever the card is. But don't get hung up on one number that tries (and always fails) to encapsulate way too much information.
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    LMAO decent price!!!! And he even omitted direct comparison with the 4070 Super!!!!! Hahaha what a joke, this is the most n greed shill website in the whole world

    throwback when this same guy said 4070>6950 at same price 😂 this is comedy. Can't wait to see the 9070 "review" tomorrow where he will try and fail to make it look bad compared to this failure
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    I get where you're coming from, and if the 9000 series had launched first, i would have some real issues with that score. But the 9000 series hasn't launched yet, the market is a mess with pricing all over the place, and the RTX 4070 Super and 7900 GRE basically no longer exist in retail. Given the space this card has launched into, if it can be had at MSRP, it's appropriate. Do I love it? No. But looking at it outside of a bubble, until there are more competing products, it's not the worst thing. It could definitely use more vram though.

    As for the worst GPU launch ever, nah, we tend to forget just how bad the GeForce FX 5000 and GTX 400 launches were. I'm tempted to throw the Radeon HD 2000 series in there, but they at least typically made it through their warranty period before they would outright die. This could not be said for the flagships from those other two series, the HD 2000 series was just hot, loud, and not very competitive. That said, is this the worst launch in 15 years? Undoubtedly.
    Reply
  • baboma
    >This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars?

    No surprise. 5070 is getting special attention because of Huang's "5070 > 4090" CES blurb that had the cognoscenti gnashing their teeth. The throng is itching for payback, and this is their chance.

    >What a joke.

    Yes, it's a joke that people are crying about overpriced GPUs, when the price of everything else had just jumped 25% overnight.

    >Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.

    Famous last words.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    This is the first review I've read, and I'd have to say that was an unexpectedly poor result.
    Leaving out the 4070S was on purpose(probably on urging from someone who provided the hardware for testing, we can guess who), no doubt because that was what it needed to stand up to and be compared with and I knew I was not alone seeing that omitted as glaringly telling.
    I'm not sure it really matters, because there will not be any real availability of note probably until the 5070S is close to release.
    MSRP? haha, that's the real joke.
    Reply
  • DRagor
    btmedic04 said:
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    You forgot about fake ROPs
    Reply