Ads
Ads
All about Software
 Latest Software articles
Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?

Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?
Often hailed as the solution to Windows Vista performance problems, we wanted to know just how much better Windows 7 really is. We put one of our most recent test platforms through its paces to find out, benchmarking raw performance and responsiveness. Read More

  • How To: Windows XP Mode In...Ubuntu Linux?
    Windows 7's XP Mode has already convinced many users who sat out for Vista to go out and upgrade. But will they buy the right version of Windows 7 to get XPM? You do know you can get the same XP functionality from a Linux distribution for free, right? Read More
All Software articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
crazy : Xiao Xiao 7 A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
Ads

Sponsored links

Activision Did Not Want CoD: Modern Warfare

Next news
4:20 PM - October 8, 2009 by Marcus Yam

Activision wanted more World War II. We're glad Infinity Ward didn't.

It's hard to imagine that any publisher wouldn't want a stunning shooter series such as Call of Duty: Modern Warfare in their stable, but it turns out that Activision originally rejected the idea.

"With Call of Duty 2, we were dead set against it being World War 2," Infinity Ward boss Vince Zampella told the Official PlayStation Magazine, as reported by CVG. "And something I'll add to that, Activision also did not want Modern Warfare. They thought working on a modern game was risky and [thought], 'oh my god you can't do that, it's crazy!' They were doing market research to show us we were wrong the whole time."

"We had to fight for everything," chimed in CoD project lead, Jason West. "They wanted it to be World War 2. Again."

Of course, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare ended up being one of the biggest hits of 2007 and its sequel, Modern Warfare 2 will easily be one of the biggest for 2009.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
CRosko42 10/08/2009 10:32 PM
Hide
-19+

Big props to I.W. on ignoring the so called "research" and pushing forward anyway.

I'm looking forward to spending most of my gaming time during winter break with MW2.

bydesign 10/08/2009 10:38 PM
Show
nun 10/08/2009 10:38 PM
Hide
-5+

"Of course, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare ended up being one of the biggest hits of 2007 and its sequel, Modern Warfare 2 will easily be one of the biggest for 2009."

Hell yea!

IronRyan21 10/08/2009 10:39 PM
Hide
-4+

Ugh if COD4 was another WW2....... I wonder what sold more COD WAW or COD4. Modern Warfare Rocked, and I can't wait for MW2. Good call by the Project Team.

agentjon 10/08/2009 10:42 PM
Hide
-20+

Shows that execs have no clue what us plebs want.

doomtomb 10/08/2009 10:43 PM
Hide
-17+

Activision is like a wannabe EA now

fonzy 10/08/2009 10:46 PM
Hide
-2+

If i had to pick one I would buy Battlefield Bad Company 2 but I probably won't pick up either.

I'm patiently waiting for BF3.

Jerky_san 10/08/2009 10:52 PM
Hide
-1+

The thing about Cod 4 is that it didn't paint anyone in a real bad light. Yeah you had "terrorist" but they weren't all from a specific country.. nor did they mention which country the war was going on in even though you could probably guess.. Sometimes edgy is the best way to go.

Platypus 10/08/2009 10:53 PM
Hide
-3+

Now if the MMO companies would try to think on their own instead of just copying all of the previous "fantasy" titles before it, we might start a nice trend here.

Occasionally you get a title outside of the typical genre (Eve, City of Heroes) but there are so many other areas of fiction already out there developers refuse to touch. They keep going with fantasy "because that's what the research tells us to do."

Props to anyone who is willing to take that chance and make something different.

kami3k 10/08/2009 11:25 PM
Show
spectrewind 10/08/2009 11:27 PM
Hide
-7+

agentjon :
Shows that execs have no clue what us plebs want.



Exactly. This statement reaches far beyond the entertainment industry as well.

kami3k 10/08/2009 11:28 PM
Hide
-1+

doomtomb :
Activision is like a wannabe EA now



No, it IS what EA was 2 years ago. EA actually somewhat cares now. Activision only care about money, money and money. Not about improving gaming as a well and coming up with new ideas. This is why they kept spryo (or w/e it's called) and dropped games like WiC: Soviet Assault and even Brutal Legend.

schmich 10/08/2009 11:40 PM
Hide
-1+

It's written (especially the title) as if they didn't want the final product COD4:MW, as if the product was bad. That's not true, they simply wanted it set in WW2. If the same team developed the game WW2 it would probably also be a great game. WW2 games needed a break though, so I'm glad they didn't.

Dekasav 10/09/2009 12:24 PM
Hide
-3+

Actually, the entire reason I never bought CoD: MW was the modern part. Guess I'm odd...

X3nophobe 10/09/2009 12:27 PM
Hide
-2+

Love COD4 but would welcome a remake of COD2 with the achievements and new lobby system. COD2 is still my favourite in the series .

stradric 10/09/2009 12:49 PM
Hide
-6+

My guess is that Activision wanted to stick with a politically safe WW2 story rather than let the developers have creative freedom with the tumultuous political climate of today.

As far as my money goes, I'm way more interested in modern warfare than WW2 warfare. I didn't even bother with WaW despite it being complete gameplay-wise. The WW2 shooter genre is completely oversaturated as far as I'm concerned. I'll stick with what's in there and not even bother with anything new.

hakuryuu 10/09/2009 1:43 AM
Hide
-2+

Well Activision wasn't asking the right people because myself and a lot of people are so friggin sick of WW2 games at this point. I wasn't that interested in WW2 in the first place so why would I want to play the same basic story yet again? There is a reason I didn't play CoD5:WaW.

eddieroolz 10/09/2009 1:46 AM
Show
Anonymous 10/09/2009 3:33 AM
Hide
-5+

There's only so much you can mine out of WWII. Kudos to Infinity Ward to trying something new.

hakesterman 10/09/2009 4:05 AM
Hide
-1+

Why would you want to base video games now on something that happened 40-80 years ago when you have the ability to put them into todays weapons???? Kinda silly if you ask me. Although i think WW2 games still have a nitvh, but they need to be more creative in their game designs and better AI.

ProDigit80 10/09/2009 5:34 AM
Show
Maxor127 10/09/2009 6:21 AM
Hide
-5+

Just shows publishers don't know shit. I'm actually disgusted now reading how dumb Activision was and probably how every other publisher is. That's why we get franchises that get run into the ground instead of fresh games because publishers don't like taking risks. And the sad thing is Modern Warfare wasn't that big of a risk. In fact, it was a long overdue and logical evolution of the series.

CoryInJapan 10/09/2009 7:26 AM
Hide
-1+

COD4 is easily the best COD game in the series..Actually I didnt like the COD series much untill COD4. After reading this article I love Infinity ward even more now.To celebreation on some good news Im going to go play some COD4.

archange 10/09/2009 8:21 AM
Hide
-0+

CoD-check, CoD2-check, CoD4-(woohoo)check, WoW-check, MW2 - can't freakin' wait!

I did love CoD2, back in the day, played it online until the arrival of Modern Warfare, which was the first game that actually made me want to create a clan. Which I did. Kudos to Infinity Ward - hopefully we'll be porting the clan to the new installment ASAP.

datawrecker 10/09/2009 4:26 PM
Hide
--2+

kami3k :
Bah who cares, CoD 4 2 will still suck ass just like the first one did. Second biggest game purchase mistake on my part. Number one will be getting the collectors edition of age of conan.



Wow, your taste in games must suck, considering that you actually purchased Age of Conan. Even wasted money on the collectors edition. AND THEN YOU TOLD EVERYONE!! LOL!!! Looks like those are your top three mistakes right there.

TommySch 10/09/2009 5:43 PM
Hide
-0+

kami3k :
Bah who cares, CoD 4 2 will still suck ass just like the first one did. Second biggest game purchase mistake on my part. Number one will be getting the collectors edition of age of conan.



Age of conan... If i was you I would keep that information secret.

jerreece 10/09/2009 6:28 PM
Hide
-1+

IronRyan21 :
Ugh if COD4 was another WW2....... I wonder what sold more COD WAW or COD4. Modern Warfare Rocked, and I can't wait for MW2. Good call by the Project Team.



Not to mention COD WAW was NOTHING like the previous CoD games that were so popular. The game play/feel just wasn't the same at all. Graphically, it was pretty. But it just wasn't the same as the MoH/CoD series was.

liquidsnake718 10/09/2009 6:42 PM
Hide
-1+

Lol age of Conan....

smokinu 10/09/2009 7:12 PM
Hide
-1+

HAHAHA Dude I was thinking the same thing abotu Age of Conan. What a freaking waste of time and money... I coulda spent that at the strip club

jerreece 10/09/2009 7:20 PM
Hide
-2+

smokinu :
I coulda spent that at the strip club



Talk about a waste of time & money.

You get 20 or 30 minutes of "Yay! Giggle, Blush, Oops I wet myself"... and you still go home single, lonely, and a loser with less cash.

For the record, I do play Age of Conan, and actually enjoy it. :) But I also play Crysis, GTA IV, CoD series, and many others.

Belardo 10/09/2009 7:48 PM
Hide
-1+

COD5: The Civil War
COD6: Roman Empire
COD7: The Cola Wars of 2025
COD8: Console Wars PS vs XB Blood Hell
COD9: Battlefield of the year 3000


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • By Travis Meacham Maybe the gamer on your Christmas list is more of the creative type, and you'd like to get a gift that encourages their creative side and their love of games. If that's the case, the FPS Creator from Enteractive and The Game Creators could fit that bill perfectly. The FPS Creator is a program for PCs that allows users to create complete first-person shooter games without writing a single line of code. It uses a simple drag-and-drop interface consisting of a set of pre-fab objects - weapons, furniture and enemies - and a design space where game levels may be constructed. It takes a little getting used to, but with some patience and the manual's step-by-step instructions, your gamer will be off and creating in no time. FPS Creator is packed with potential, and tools to help you realize same. FPS Creator reminded me of the Neverwinter Nights Toolset that came with both NWN games. The interface is pretty similar, and both use an object-oriented, scripting-supported graphical interface. FPS Creator can only take a game-builder so far without doing some coding, though. While it can design levels, drop in pre-made enemies, configure some simple A.I. routines, and populate each level with weapons, objects and ammo, those who really want to get into the finer workings of game design, will have to learn some scripting. Thankfully, FPS Creator has an active forum attached to its website. It offers a multitude of tutorials on using this tool, scripting basics, and even entire scripts gamers can copy and paste to suit their needs. Bear in mind that these sorts of game-creation tools deliver only what builders put into them. Novices won't build something to rival Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, but they might learn the basics of videogame design and level construction. Also, for anyone who's ever considered a career in game design, FPS Creator will give them a real taste of the work involved. This isn't a game unto itself, but it is an easy-to-use tool that introduces people to level design for first-person shooters. FPS Creator takes a little work, but creative types will find the results rewarding, and just might end up getting involved in a mod community when all is said and done.

  • Our test system for this article employs the Asrock 939 Dual SATA 2 motherboard, which is packed with an abundance of upgrade-oriented features. It supports native 8X AGP, PCI Express x16, single- and dual-core Socket 939 processors with dual-channel DDR memory, and even socket AM2 CPUs and DDR2 memory with a daughter board, which we used for testing. While searching online auction sites, we have seen people spending $200 or more for a Socket 939 Athlon 64 X2 4800+. It’s one of the fastest Socket 939 dual-core CPUs produced, but the device also represents a lot of money considering you can buy an even faster AM2 Athlon X2 for well under $100. Those stuck with Socket 939 will need to search the Web long and hard for a well-priced dual-core for their motherboard, but our AM2 compatible motherboard gives us the convenience of opting for an AM2 CPU with very little trouble and expense. We chose the following CPUs to examine the effects they have on gaming performance. First is the AMD Athlon 64 4000+. It’s base don the San Diego design, runs at 2.4 GHz, sports 1 MB L2 cache, and is one of the faster single-core desktop CPUs made. The direct comparison dual-core to this device is the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (2.4 GHz 1 MB cache per core). Next, we chose the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200 + dual-core, which has a 2.2 GHz Manchester architecture with 512 KB L2 cache per core. The single-core direct comparison would be the A64 3500+, so our A64 4000+ should have an advantage both in clock speed and L2 cache in single-threaded applications. And lastly, the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ AM2 dual-core is a 2.8 GHz Windsor design with 1 MB L2 cache per core. With these three CPUs, we should get a good look at single- versus dual-core in gaming and have a good idea about how CPU clock speeds affect game play. Tested Hardware Motherboard Asrock 939 Dual SATA 2 Bios vs. P 2.30 Asrock AM2 CPU Board RAM 2 GB (2 * 1 GB) dual-channel Adata DDR 400 (3-3-3-8) for Socket 939 2 GB (2 *1GB) dual-channel Corsair DDR2 533 (4-4-4-12) for Socket AM2 Video Cards XFX GeForce 8800 GS 384 MB PCI Express 580MHz core/ 700(1400) MHz memory HIS Radeon HD 4850 512 MB PCI Express 625 MHz core/ 993 (1986) MHz memory Sound Card Creative SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio Hard Drive Seagate Barracuda 250GB 7200 RPM 16 MB Cache SATA 3.0 Gb/s Power Supply Antec EarthWatts 430 W OS Windows XP Professional 32 bit Service Pack 2 Display Driver Nvidia ForceWare 174.74 AMD Catalyst 8.8 Benchmarks 3DMark05 v. 1.3.0 3DMark06 v. 1.1.0 F.E.A.R. v.1.08 Far Cry v.1.4 Need For Speed Carbon 1.4 Test Drive Unlimited 1.66A Oblivion 1.2 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 1.4 Crysis 1.2