Zuckerberg: No Facebook Phone, Confirms Search Engine

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer
    People want answers to their queries, not a pile of results to sift through, he added. "Search engines are really evolving to give you a set of answers, ‘I'm too lazy to do any research for myself, so snoop into all of my personal information and then do my thinking for me,'" he said.

    Fixed that for you...
    Reply
  • spartanmk2
    The weekend cant get here soon enough :(
    Reply
  • samkl
    Search engines have simple workflow: ask-> find -> answer. If you keep getting irrelevant answers, then search feels like a broken experience.

    Facebook has huge wealth of data. Some might be useful and some is just mumbo-jumbo . Interesting how FB will make their data useful and what people will find useful.
    Could "googling" become "facebooking"?
    -SK

    Reply
  • teh_chem
    Old_Fogie_Late_BloomerPeople want answers to their queries, not a pile of results to sift through, he added. "Search engines are really evolving to give you a set of answers, ‘I'm too lazy to do any research for myself, so snoop into all of my personal information and then do my thinking for me,'" he said.Fixed that for you...But on the other hand, why would I want to make a research project out of finding a specific site/answer/product? Sure, I'm fine with sifting through results to find what I need, but if I don't have to, why would I want to? I'd rather just be more efficient so I can do other more worthwhile things with my time. Not that a search result takes up THAT much time to sift through, but what MZ is discussing is less of a "search" and more of an "answer." And I think--despite how I feel about FB in general--that that does have relevance to a lot of users. His example is pretty good too--"I'm similar to my friends, and I probably have similar food opinions, so find me a sushi restaurant around me that my friends also liked." That should be an entirely different answer than if you searched yelp or google places. I think FB has mostly been a joke in terms of its IPO, but there is also the capacity to produce a service that appeals to a lot of people. Outside of sharing your mundane trivial quips, that is...
    Reply
  • Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer
    teh_chemNot that a search result takes up THAT much time to sift through...This is my point. We're not talking the difference between "a research project" and "do more worthwhile things with my time". We're talking a few minutes. If it is worth it to someone to tell Facebook a whole bunch of personal information just to save a minute or two while looking for a sushi place, then great, but...
    Reply
  • dalethepcman
    Why would I search facebook for sushi restaurants my friends liked in New York. When I could just ask my friends what restaurants they like?

    And if I was feeling especially introverted, then I would go to urbanspoon for newyork and click on sushi...

    Social search is a useless tool for the masses, and only assists governments and corporations on tracking users and gathering trend data.
    Reply
  • halcyon
    Facebook. What a waste.
    Reply
  • teh_chem
    Old_Fogie_Late_BloomerThis is my point. We're not talking the difference between "a research project" and "do more worthwhile things with my time". We're talking a few minutes. If it is worth it to someone to tell Facebook a whole bunch of personal information just to save a minute or two while looking for a sushi place, then great, but...Oh, don't get me wrong--I'm not disagreeing with you in principle. It doesn't matter to me personally if I look through a set of results--but at the same time, a set of results is not actually an answer. And if a user is looking for an answer, then that's not the best service for them. I think it's a realistic lack in the "search service" market, especially when you consider that most people are doing things on their phones vs. their desktops--on an inherently less-UI-friendly platform for "lengthy" search/browsing.
    Reply
  • anti-painkilla
    Soon 'hot single girl within 50km that has low standards' will actually bring back results.
    Reply
  • Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer
    anti-painkillaSoon 'hot single girl within 50km that has low standards' will actually bring back results.The search engine will look at all the women you tag as "Close Friends" (or whatever) on Facebook, analyze their pictures to build a profile of what you find attractive, and then offer you a "hotness" slider so that you can select how close to that ideal the potential search result has to be.

    It'll also have a slider allowing you to choose which standard of "single" you're comfortable with.

    Clicking "More options" will also let you set your standard for "female".
    Reply