Ads
Ads
All about Tweaking & Tuning
 Latest Tweaking & Tuning articles
Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 1

Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 1
Think your Athlon or Phenom processor is already tuned to deliver the best balance between performance and power consumption? Think again. We show you how to tweak Cool'n'Quiet for even more aggressive speed at maximum efficiency using several AMD CPUs. Read More

  • Desktop Linux For The Windows Power User
    Are you a die-hard Windows user, sworn to shun all things Apple, yet (secretly) intimidated by the pocket-protector stereotype of Linux? Fear not! We got our hands on Ubuntu 9.04 and walk you through getting it running in this step-by-step guide. Read More
All Tweaking & Tuning articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

adventure : Ray Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
Ads

Sponsored links

Overdrive: U.S. Team IRONMODS Wins!

Next news
11:10 AM - December 14, 2008 by Patrick Schmid

After 16 hours of intense overclocking over two days, we have a world champion. Team IRONMODS from the United States - Jeremiah Allen, Jake Crimmins and Ton Khowdee, achieved the best scores during our Overdrive event, overclocking Core i7 Extreme 965 systems on X58 Eclipse motherboards by MSI. The race was long, but it also was almost neck and neck, as the scores kept improving almost every minute.

The Taiwan team CBB had a head start, as they quickly posted scores during the event. France started a bit late, with one team member being delayed on day one. Italy and Germany were always very active and the US team took some time to get up to speed. But their efforts were worth it: they were fastest in two 3DMark benchmarks, they dominated in wPrime 1024M and 32M. These four wins, combined with good scores on the other benchmarks, assured IRONMODS win.

Italy was close behind, with two wins in SuperPI 1M and 3DMark 05. Germany reached third place, with the strategy being to not fall too far behind the others in any benchmark. France was fourth and Taiwan fifth, as they had issues running the Core i7 in triple channel memory mode.

Final results:

BenchmarkUSATaiwanGermanyFranceItaly
SuperPi 1.5 1M8,0788,1578,0937,9877,985
SuperPi 1.5 32M7 min 49,969 s7 min 52,516 s7 min 40,953 s7 min 24,990 s7 min 40.984 s
wPrime 1.55 32M5,1885,4225,2195,7565,297
wPrime 1.55 1024M160,937170,375165,872186,982165,11
PiFast 4.117,5617,8617,4417,2917,36
AquaMark 2003253814251703319212238929233043
3DMark 017101071591727647154571821
3DMark 037979475002761056986576188
3DMark 053676235893365863573337070
3DMark 062673325483241942231825143

As you can see, all the teams except Taiwan, which had those pesky hardware, were able to reach top scores in at least two benchmark categories. Even France, which took fourth place, reached two Overdrive records.

Congratulations to the US team, IRONMODS, which proved to be a magnanimous winner, thanking all the other guys for being excellent competitors and great sportsmen. We were glad to have the opportunity to host all these guys, and we'll provide a summary article next week.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
Shadow703793 12/14/2008 5:56 PM
Hide
-2+

Well done!

cl_spdhax1 12/14/2008 6:04 PM
Hide
-2+

woot gj usa!!

Nicku 12/14/2008 6:43 PM
Hide
-0+

congrats to all teams !

dieseldre2k 12/14/2008 11:06 PM
Hide
-4+

yay, we regain the nerd crown! what an honor!

Pei-chen 12/14/2008 11:16 PM
Hide
-0+

So what's the final clock speed? You have only posted a "Clock Speeds Reached after Less Than 5 Hours" a few pages back. I assume the team managed to squeeze more performance.

sacre 12/15/2008 12:24 PM
Show
kelfen 12/15/2008 1:03 AM
Hide
-1+

Wootz Wootz Great job

nebun 12/15/2008 11:02 AM
Show
blackened144 12/15/2008 2:57 PM
Hide
-0+

Quote :if they used some kind of fancy cooling set up then this is really not that great. how many people can really afford to cool their systems for every day use? not many. we need to see more test done an system that people can afford


This was not the "who can get the most stable overclock using only air cooling and make the CPU last 500 years of 'regular use' contest"... This was a "who could overclock the most using "fancy cooling' with it being just barley stable enough to post the fastest scores before their CPU melted down "OVERDRIVE" contest"..

nebun 12/15/2008 3:53 PM
Show
blackened144 12/15/2008 4:13 PM
Hide
-0+

Quote :so what's the point? if someone wants to know the potential of a certain cpu it would be much easier to just call the company that made it and ask them. i am sure that intel and amd perform such tests in their labs. at least you think that they would. oh well, such a waste.


This competition was not to determine "the potential of a certain cpu", the purpose of this competition is to see which overclocking team is better than the other. Stop being such a pantywaste.

rambo117 12/15/2008 4:35 PM
Hide
-0+

yay!!! go IRONMODS!!!

nebun 12/15/2008 5:05 PM
Show
blackened144 12/15/2008 5:24 PM
Hide
-2+

Quote :i say again: what does this prove?


This proves that the team from America IRONMODS is the best overclocking team around and that you are indeed a pantywaste trying to ruin it for everyone else.

bounty 12/15/2008 5:36 PM
Hide
-0+

that IRONMODS got a better sample and guessed the better mobo to use?

bounty 12/15/2008 5:40 PM
Hide
-0+

Don't get me wrong, these people have mad skillz, but the margins on stuff like this leaves alot to chance I think.

blackened144 12/15/2008 7:00 PM
Hide
-0+

Thats why this only proves they are the best overclockers in this competition on that day.. If they did it the next day, or chose different hardware, who knows what would have happened. I compare it to professional poker. It takes a lot of skill to play the game competitively, but its a card game that in the end all boils down to chance.

blackened144 12/15/2008 7:07 PM
Hide
-0+

My point about the comparison to poker was simply that just because there is chance involved doesnt mean it still shouldnt be done.

nebun 12/15/2008 8:11 PM
Hide
--2+

blackened144 :
My point about the comparison to poker was simply that just because there is chance involved doesnt mean it still shouldnt be done.


any of those teams could have won, it all depends on the hardware. as you know not all processors, memory, or chipsets perform the same. it just happened that they had better performing hardware.

grieve 12/16/2008 12:25 PM
Hide
-0+

Not to change the subject… but blackened144 I think you are wrong about poker, it does not boil down to chance…. I will bet my life that if you play a champion poker player 10 nights in a row you might win 2 nights of the 10 (assuming you are an amateur player). No question luck is a factor; however in poker the best hand does not always win. At the end of the day you do need at least a few good hands to win, but you certainly don’t need pocket aces all night long. Poker = skill, and a little luck helps.

This OC tournament is won by the hardware. Not to take anything away from anyone who participated, there all top notch im sure. Im certain all teams used the same tricks/techniques, one team had the best hardware that day.

nebun 12/16/2008 1:59 AM
Hide
-0+

grieve :
Not to change the subject… but blackened144 I think you are wrong about poker, it does not boil down to chance…. I will bet my life that if you play a champion poker player 10 nights in a row you might win 2 nights of the 10 (assuming you are an amateur player). No question luck is a factor; however in poker the best hand does not always win. At the end of the day you do need at least a few good hands to win, but you certainly don’t need pocket aces all night long. Poker = skill, and a little luck helps.This OC tournament is won by the hardware. Not to take anything away from anyone who participated, there all top notch im sure. Im certain all teams used the same tricks/techniques, one team had the best hardware that day.



AMEN :)

Anonymous 12/16/2008 2:13 AM
Hide
-1+

Guys our cpu wasnt that good in the contest. Most of the other guys were way faster than us by atleast 200-300MHZ. We just had what it took to get the win. our GPU clocks were pretty good as well which whelped us in all of the 3d runs.

cangelini 12/16/2008 11:02 AM
Hide
-0+

Though I hate to burst the bubble of anyone so intent on being critical of competitive overclocking, these guys really do use different techniques and different strategies to set themselves apart from the competition. I’d recommend actually watching some of these guys in action before knocking what it is they do. It’s really fun stuff once you’re in the trenches, watching them try to maintain a temperature cold enough to sustain a certain clock speed but not so low as to cold bug out. Go Team Ironmods—was rooting for you guys all weekend!

Anonymous 12/16/2008 1:31 PM
Hide
-0+

hey, my Quad Core Xtreme computed Pi's 1M in 7,349. not overcloked...

boop334 12/16/2008 9:42 PM
Hide
-0+

Yes! USA ftw!

Crashman 12/17/2008 5:20 AM
Hide
-0+

dieseldre2k :




The USA team had no choice but to win...just to come out even. That is to say, if the US wins spectators from other countries just say "that's fine, lucky break, whatever" but if the US loses they try to rub our noses in it...

Most spectators don't know anything about good sportsmanship, it's always "USA-v-everyone else".

Having noted what usually happens, I'm really happy to see very little gloating in this thread!

Crashman 12/17/2008 5:33 AM
Hide
-0+

bounty wrote :

that IRONMODS got a better sample and guessed the better mobo to use?




One of the other teams in the US competition made similar claims, because they basically ruined some parts and wasted too much time preping others. In fact, they ripped a pin out of a pre-tested (and pre-loaded) motherboard and claimed it was that way when they got it. I won't mention any names, but they did get a third board just to shut them up, so "unlucky", the other guys had lessers "skillz" etc.

It's all about strategy, you get a dud part and try to work around it. Everyone got two boards and processors, so everyone should have been capable of picking the "less dudly dud".

BTW, I've played lots of poker, I've only sat through like, one game where every hand I had was bad. Yes, if you're bluffing or folding at every hand people eventually figure out that you're getting a bad run of cards...but that only happens in what, one of 500 games?

Anonymous 12/17/2008 11:33 AM
Hide
-0+

Howcome you make an overclocking contest without inviting any Polish and/or Portuguese team?!

miahallen 12/18/2008 8:37 AM
Hide
-1+

cangelini :



Thanks for all the encouragement everyone! We really enjoyed the contest, and thanks for your interest. To those of you who are critical of these types of events, I'd like to second C. Angelini's comments. It really is quite interesting to get involveved and/or see it go down in person. This contest lasted a total of 15 hours...if it was only about the hardware, and only up to chance...we would have only needed about 4 hours. However, it takes time to get the most out of the platform, and to extract the most of each benchmark, and the techniques/tweaks used by each team are often VERY different.

Crashman 12/18/2008 10:17 AM
Hide
-0+

Howdy Miah


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links