Your Top Picks: Tom's Hardware Forums' Q1 2013 BestConfigs

Home NAS Server

 Five Home NAS Server builds were chosen to represent this category's BestConfigs. 

Breadwhistle’s “No shirt, no shoes, but LOTS of storage” handily took the win with 15 votes. 

Congratulations to forum member Breadwhistle for having his recommended build picked by the Tom's Hardware community this quarter!

Unlike 2011’s NAS PC, Breadwhistle didn’t include a pricey NAS enclosure, which shored up enough cash for a potent processor, unlike the previous build's embedded VIA Nano. This year’s NAS PC is powered by the A6-5400K, a dual-module APU. It's not exactly a gamer’s delight, but surely up to any network storage task.

ASRock’s full-ATX FM2A75 motherboard served as Breadwhistle’s canvas for this build. Plenty of room for additional components, USB 3.0, and SATA 6Gb/s should keep this NAS server relatively modern for years to come.

Four gigs of G.Skill DDR3-1600 and a 64 GB SSD from Crucial also present a step up from the previous build’s DDR3-1333 and 5,400 RPM hard drive. The 80 PLUS-certified CX430 from Corsair’s Builder Series powers yet another system, while the Asus DRW-24B3ST makes a third appearance in a BestConfig this quarter.

G.Skill RipjawsXG.Skill RipjawsXCrucial m4Crucial m4Corsair CX430Corsair CX430

A trio of 3 TB Western Digital Red hard drives handle the network-attached storage need.

One reason that Breadwhistle was able to create a better system than the previous NAS BestConfig winner (at the same price point) was his choice of chassis. Whereas the last system included a purpose-built NAS enclosure, Breadwhistle opted instead for the Cooler Master Elite 430, a pretty standard mid-tower.

This configuration came to $773.38 when originally submitted by Breadwhistle. The current prices of Breadwhistle’s “No shirt, no shoes, but LOTS of storage” can be found in the BestConfigs shopping tables.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
72 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • nordlead
    A good thing I don't use these "forum best configs" as guides. It looks like every single one of them was built by a power hungry gamer rather than an economical engineer that builds to meet specific requirements.

    The NAS chosen here has WAY to much space dedicated to the OS drive (driving up costs), and all the benefits of the SSD are lost (you won't be loading new programs off the SSD) except for the low power. But that can be achieved for much less cash with a CF or SD card (or even a USB stick, but I don't care for those since they can easily be unplugged). You also don't need 4GB of RAM in a NAS, nor do you need a fancy case with a window when it will be stuck in a closet. I could shave $150-200 off of that machine no problem and cut the electrical costs, all while serving files via NAS to multiple machines at the same time without missing a beat. Heck, my Atom D525 does all of that at a measly 30W (measured at the wall) along with online backups, and serves web pages at a decent clip for myself and my close friends. Since I'm sure the intent of the 3x 3TB hdds was for RAID 5, you could put that $ towards a 4th and do RAID 10. Or you could put it towards actual backup instead of redundancy.
    11
  • echondo
    That is not a "budget" AMD system...
    11
  • internetlad
    nevertellWhy do all the builds use poser ram ?


    And what RAM would you suggest, Mr. RAM Expert? What's wrong with brands like Mushkin and G.Skill? They're incredibly popular.

    Honestly, does brand even make a difference in RAM besides warranty? You put it in and it works or it doesn't. As long as you have enough RAM to accomodate what's running, and it doesn't BSOD, I don't really care about the brand.
    10
  • Other Comments
  • k1114
    Congrats to everyone!
    4
  • echondo
    That is not a "budget" AMD system...
    11
  • EzioAs
    Anonymous said:
    That is not a "budget" AMD system...


    Still within a certain budget. Just not on the lower side for a gaming PC.
    -2
  • nevertell
    Why do all the builds use poser ram ?
    -7
  • nordlead
    A good thing I don't use these "forum best configs" as guides. It looks like every single one of them was built by a power hungry gamer rather than an economical engineer that builds to meet specific requirements.

    The NAS chosen here has WAY to much space dedicated to the OS drive (driving up costs), and all the benefits of the SSD are lost (you won't be loading new programs off the SSD) except for the low power. But that can be achieved for much less cash with a CF or SD card (or even a USB stick, but I don't care for those since they can easily be unplugged). You also don't need 4GB of RAM in a NAS, nor do you need a fancy case with a window when it will be stuck in a closet. I could shave $150-200 off of that machine no problem and cut the electrical costs, all while serving files via NAS to multiple machines at the same time without missing a beat. Heck, my Atom D525 does all of that at a measly 30W (measured at the wall) along with online backups, and serves web pages at a decent clip for myself and my close friends. Since I'm sure the intent of the 3x 3TB hdds was for RAID 5, you could put that $ towards a 4th and do RAID 10. Or you could put it towards actual backup instead of redundancy.
    11
  • samwelaye
    budget AMD gamer: 1000$. budget intel gamer: 500$. wth is going on here. sure 1000 IS a budget by the definition of it, but this is by no means a "budget" build
    7
  • internetlad
    nevertellWhy do all the builds use poser ram ?


    And what RAM would you suggest, Mr. RAM Expert? What's wrong with brands like Mushkin and G.Skill? They're incredibly popular.

    Honestly, does brand even make a difference in RAM besides warranty? You put it in and it works or it doesn't. As long as you have enough RAM to accomodate what's running, and it doesn't BSOD, I don't really care about the brand.
    10
  • s3anister
    Interesting builds and over all decent. Can't say I agree with the choice of Motherboard and PSU for the High-End Intel build, though. Would have gone with the Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH or a similar Asus mobo and a Seasonic PSU myself.
    0
  • g-unit1111
    The name of my AMD Office PC was a quote from Bill Lumbergh from Office Space. "Yeah I'm gonna have to ask you to work on Saturday, Sunday too. We lost a lot of people over the weekend and we need to play sort of catch - up. If you could get here around 9:00, that'd be greaaaaaaaaaaaat."
    3
  • Nintendo Maniac 64
    Why would you use the 5800k over the 65w 5700 for a mere office machine? Not to mention the mobo chosen for it has no VRM heatsinks and therefore cannot reliably overclock anyway, making the aftermarket cooler pointless in the first place.
    4
  • internetlad
    Nintendo Maniac 64Why would you use the 5800k over the 65w 5700 for a mere office machine? Not to mention the mobo chosen for it has no VRM heatsinks and therefore cannot reliably overclock anyway, making the aftermarket cooler pointless in the first place.


    You have to remember this is the build that was VOTED FOR by the community. Of course the better chip is gonna get the fanboys all wet, even though, as you say, it IS for an office build.

    I quoted an extremely capable AMD office/APU gaming machine and managed to shave 150 bucks off the $500 budget, (I had spent a couple days researching it for my brother in law, who's wife wouldn't let him spend much.) and it didn't get one vote. Why? Maybe because it didn't have 3 terabyte drives, or 16 gigs of ram. It was a modest but extremely functional and cost effective machine for the cost, and nobody seemed to care.
    2
  • silverblue
    From what I've seen, the 5700 is the better chip, at least in terms of HTPCs. Sure, it's a few percent slower than the 5800K, but it's far better on power.
    1
  • nevertell
    internetladAnd what RAM would you suggest, Mr. RAM Expert? What's wrong with brands like Mushkin and G.Skill? They're incredibly popular.Honestly, does brand even make a difference in RAM besides warranty? You put it in and it works or it doesn't. As long as you have enough RAM to accomodate what's running, and it doesn't BSOD, I don't really care about the brand.

    Well, it's a rule of thumb that RAM without heatspreaders comes cheaper. And it's been proven time and time again, that those heatspreaders don't benefit the regular computer in any kind of way. If you're on a budget, ram is the first place to compromise, if you've already chosen something with heatspreaders and whatnot and you won't be using cpu's integrated graphics. It's only the iGPU's of todays A-series APUs that truly benefit from substantially faster RAM in any meaningul way.
    1
  • hapkido
    Anonymous said:
    So no benchmarks just a popularity contest ? Next time just post pics and stats of the girls that is something to vote on. May seem harsh but anyone can pull parts out of a catalog. assembling and getting it running optimally is what separates the wheat from the chaff.


    These were hypothetical builds. And assembling a PC is much easier than picking the right components. But if you want to buy me the parts from my media PC build, I'll benchmark it playing a video or something.
    0
  • JerryC
    These systems arent really complete. You need to include a monitor, keyboard and mouse to complete these systems.
    0
  • g-unit1111
    Anonymous said:
    These systems arent really complete. You need to include a monitor, keyboard and mouse to complete these systems.


    The rules were you had to create a system with the given budget, and keyboard, mouse, monitor, and OS were not included in the budget.
    1
  • jnkweaver
    The LAN system is more in line with the AMD budget build. Both in the $1200-1300 range.
    I own the ARC MIDI case and Fractal Design uses thick steel. I love Fractal Design cases but good luck hauling it around on LAN parties when the case alone weighs 20 lbs.

    I was surprised the high end Intel build didn't use the Noctua DH14 for the cooler. On a $2200 build it is worth spending the extra $70.

    Overall they were good builds and got alot of participation. It does seem though that the earlier builds in the article got low participation especially the Intel Home Office build.
    1
  • obrada
    I don't think that the budget intel gaming PC should had won. It says clearly on the rules that the range price was $1,000 and everyone who made the builds were on that range except 2 guys and 1 of the resulting the one with most votes. I believe that if the price range would have been $500 the story would have been different.
    0
  • hapkido
    Anonymous said:
    hapkidoThese were hypothetical builds. And assembling a PC is much easier than picking the right components. But if you want to buy me the parts from my media PC build, I'll benchmark it playing a video or something.


    Hypothetical build = hypothetical performance

    Take the fm2 home office monster g-unit1111 put together home office with only 4 usb ports on the board , sure it has a header for 6 more but not one is usb 3.0. Home office means lots of peripherals, fast ones that need 3.0 for everyday use. I just wish a little more thought went into this exercise but hey when pigs fly right !



    Are you seriously talking about benchmarking performance for a home office machine or implying a keyboard needs USB 3.0?

    While we're on the topic, what specifically is wrong with my $700 hypothetical performance media PC?
    -1
  • jkhoward
    I do not know how many of you have actually used the Fractal Design Micro ATX case but that thing sure isn't micro. It is one of the largest Mirco ATX cases that I have ever used.

    Yes it is a great case but for a "Micro" ATX case it is close to the size of a smaller Full Size tower.

    (:
    0