Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite and X Plus: Specs, release date, benchmarks, and more

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite and Snapdragon X Plus badges.
(Image credit: Qualcomm, collage by Tom's Hardware)

Qualcomm and Microsoft have tried to make Windows on Arm a serious platform for years, and this next big swing is the most promising shot yet. In mid-2024, the first devices with Qualcomm's new Snapdragon X Series processors — the Snapdragon X Elite and Snapdragon X Plus — are poised to ship.

This time, things may be different. Qualcomm's X Elite and X Plus are based on the company's new Oryon cores, which the company is betting on for more power and efficiency. Following Apple's success with its M-series chips, Qualcomm is looking to prove what Arm can do for Windows notebooks, aiming for thin, long-lasting, powerful PCs. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Notton
    I hope you folks get to review one soon, because the slide claiming GPU performance is crazy.

    We already know that it hits a smooth 1080p 30fps with medium setting in Baulder's Gate 3, but we also know that Z1 Extreme (7840U) can do the same with slightly higher settings.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    If they're targeted for high end systems first then they're going to flop, since the M3 Macbook Air and Pro are already well established in that segment and have proven performance. They need to target them at the sub $750 market, undercutting the MacBook Air, moving great volumes for students, travelers, and other segments, and proving Windows On Arm and Snapdragon are viable, then they can go after the $1000+ market.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    Notton said:
    I hope you folks get to review one soon, because the slide claiming GPU performance is crazy.

    We already know that it hits a smooth 1080p 30fps with medium setting in Baulder's Gate 3, but we also know that Z1 Extreme (7840U) can do the same with slightly higher settings.
    It’s wildlife extreme. It’s a mobile benchmark that Qualcomm and Intel both have heavily optimized for. Everybody knows the AMD iGPU beats both in real games.
    Reply
  • ivan_vy
    Notton said:
    I hope you folks get to review one soon, because the slide claiming GPU performance is crazy.

    We already know that it hits a smooth 1080p 30fps with medium setting in Baulder's Gate 3, but we also know that Z1 Extreme (7840U) can do the same with slightly higher settings.
    remember when M2 was going to kill iGPU and dGPU laptops?
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/apple-introduces-m2-processor-8-core-cpu-10-core-gpu-up-to-18-more-performanceand MSI Claw with intel chip was going to kill SteamDeck and the like?
    let's wait and see real world performance.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    Notton said:
    Z1 Extreme (7840U) can do the same with slightly higher settings
    Not at a presumed 20 watts though
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    If they're targeted for high end systems first then they're going to flop, since the M3 Macbook Air and Pro are already well established in that segment and have proven performance. They need to target them at the sub $750 market, undercutting the MacBook Air, moving great volumes for students, travelers, and other segments, and proving Windows On Arm and Snapdragon are viable, then they can go after the $1000+ market.

    The CPU itself is cheap .. what makes APPLE expensive are the hig end components in it , like 6 Speakers and 4 MIC plus the screen and body of the notebook.

    I am really waiting for apple to release "student" version of their MACS ,Plastic body and two speakers only and one Mic ...this would lower the MAC air price by $300 at least. and I dont know Why Apple is ignoring tis market. they made "SE" Iphone , and they should make SE MAC AIR.
    Reply
  • Notton
    JamesJones44 said:
    Not at a presumed 20 watts though
    That's uhh, not my point?
    Take a look at the graph
    IDK what garbage laptop Qualcomm used to test the 7940HS on, but if you pump 60w into the 12CU GPU, it's not going to run that slow.
    ivan_vy said:
    remember when M2 was going to kill iGPU and dGPU laptops?
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/apple-introduces-m2-processor-8-core-cpu-10-core-gpu-up-to-18-more-performanceand MSI Claw with intel chip was going to kill SteamDeck and the like?
    let's wait and see real world performance.
    Yup, MSI Claw turned out to run SLOWER than Ally Z1 extreme, despite what early rumors suggested.
    In fact, MSI Claw performance and battery run times lookl bad compared to Steamdeck OLED.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    Notton said:
    Take a look at the graph
    They are not arguing a pure speed. They are auguring performance per watt which is Qualcomm's point. This is also package SoC wattage, not just iGPU.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44

    I'm shocked a 10 core cpu beats an 8 core cpu in multi core scores (X Plus vs M3).

    When you compare equal core counts it looks like the X Elite is about on par with an M3 Pro (15,610 vs 15,683 respectively).

    Reply
  • Brian_DM
    The NPU performance of 45 TOPS should be mentioned that is for Int8 performance.
    Most older chip performance is measured by Int16 performance, this is part of the apparent large jump in performance to this new SnapDragon X Plus/Elite
    Reply