Early Snapdragon X Elite benchmark shows Arm CPU is faster than AMD's top-end mobile APU

Snapdragon X Elite
(Image credit: Qualcomm)

A leaked Geekbench 6 result for the Snapdragon X Elite shows the Qualcomm CPU performing better than the Ryzen 9 7940HS - AMD's flagship laptop APU. The Snapdragon X Elite was faster in both the single- and multi-core scores. If genuine, these scores indicate that the upcoming Arm-based CPU will be more than a match for x86 silicon in laptops and maybe even desktop PCs.

The leaked result apparently came from a test run on a "Qualcomm ZH-WXX" PC, which is presumably the name of a reference PC for the Snapdragon X Elite. It's hard to say if this reference PC shows performance consistent with what the final product is expected to have, however.

The Snapdragon X Elite is highly anticipated as it should be Qualcomm's fastest Arm chip ever, featuring 12 Oryon cores developed by Nuvia, which Qualcomm acquired in January 2021. The CPU is fabbed on TSMC's 4nm node and can boost to 4.3 GHz on two cores, with the other cores being limited to 3.8 GHz. On paper, the CPU doesn't seem like it would lead the competition, since both AMD and Intel's top mobile offerings can break 5 GHz and come with more threads, and more cores in Intel's case too.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Snapdragon X Elite Performance in Geekbench 6 Windows
Sample chipSingle-CoreMulti-Core
Snapdragon X Elite2,57412,562
Ryzen 9 7940HS2,47511,667
Ryzen 9 7945HX2,72715,623
Ryzen 5 76002,73612,260

Despite its on-paper specifications, the Snapdragon X Elite is able to exceed the performance of AMD's Ryzen 9 7940HS APU, which is AMD's top-end mobility-focused APU. Of course, AMD also has its 7045-series APUs, which are basically Ryzen 7000 desktop chips ported to a laptop form factor. The flagship Ryzen 9 7945HX beats the Snapdragon here, but not by a huge margin.

The Snapdragon could even be a potent desktop CPU if Qualcomm wishes, as it was able to match the Ryzen 5 7600 in multi-core performance and come within striking distance of its single-core performance. To be clear, the Snapdragon X Elite probably won't be competing with the likes of the Ryzen 9 7950X or Intel's Core i9-14900K, but it would nevertheless be one of two other CPUs in the world able to compete with midrange x86 chips (the other being Apple's M3).

Of course, there's one important question: is this benchmark legit? A couple of areas in the Geekbench 6 results are a little weird, with the reported base CPU clock speed being 4.01 GHz rather than 3.8 GHz and there being two CPU clusters of eight and four cores each, which is strange though it does at up to 12.

Despite these oddities, there's good reason to believe this benchmark is the real deal. Searching "Qualcomm Oryon" on Geekbench 6 will show you tons of other results for what is ostensibly the Snapdragon X Elite, including six Windows results tested on the Qualcomm ZH-WXX PC, such as the one we just looked at. The scores were all pretty consistent too, which is one point that indicates the result's authenticity. The earliest result for Windows was done on October 31, which incidentally was just after Qualcomm hosted a press event in late October to preview the performance of the Snapdragon X Elite.

Additionally, at that very same press event, Qualcomm was showcasing the Snapdragon X Elite in Geekbench 6 for Windows. That alone strongly indicates the leaks could be real, but Qualcomm also made hard performance claims for Geekbench 6's Windows version: a single-core score of roughly 2,900 and a multi-core score of about 15,000 per Anandtech. The publicly available scores fall short of those claims, but since this is all pre-launch silicon, there could be several reasons why this is the case, such as a lack of optimization or misconfigured settings. 

Matthew Connatser

Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.

  • Findecanor
    Sounds good. Just too bad that the chip is from Qualcomm.

    Does it run a Linux distro or FreeBSD?
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Is this any surprise given what we saw with the Apple M1? Actually this chip gives the same overall multi-core result as the M1 in Geekbench, and is only about 20% slower than the M3.

    The real question, however, will be how well it runs x86 programs in relation to native x86 processors. If the translation layer is as seamless as Apple's then there's no problem, but if it's not, then there's going to be a major issue, especially since Arm based Windows laptops aren't exactly cheap compared to x86.
    Reply
  • Notton
    It looks good for now, but I wonder how it will scale.
    For example, the M1 was stellar when it launched, but M2 and M3 were lackluster improvements comparatively.

    Computation benchmark numbers are one thing, but I'd like to see the power consumption/efficiency numbers as well.
    Reply
  • Brian D Smith
    BDSSNOPES must label the headline FALSE. The 7045 is the top end AMD laptop processer. Even the guts of the article says so...with some 'wordplay'.
    Reply
  • kristoffe
    Ad paid for by qualcomm... and hiding with some clever wording here and there that it DOES NOT beat the flagship mobile apu from amd. Ah, paid for reviews.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    IMO, these CPUs just need to be fast enough. Obviously, faster is better, but as long as they're not significantly faster or slower, minute differences in performance won't sway people one way or another.

    I predict Qualcomm will shoot itself in the foot by pricing these like they're Apple products, however. I think they have consistently undermined their previous attempts to penetrate the Windows laptop market through unrealistic pricing, and now that they have something actually competitive, I expect them to double-down on this unsuccessful strategy.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Findecanor said:
    Does it run a Linux distro or FreeBSD?
    Well, it seems they and Lenovo are (finally) providing pretty good Linux support for its Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 laptops, however belatedly. One might hope this is setting the stage for supporting their next gen at launch.
    https://www.phoronix.com/news/Qualcomm-Mainline-Linux-2024
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    The real question, however, will be how well it runs x86 programs in relation to native x86 processors. If the translation layer is as seamless as Apple's then there's no problem,
    You can look at reviews of the Lenovo Thinkpad X13S. That's a Win11/ARM laptop, based on the Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3. I think I recall NotebookCheck's review saying they had compatibility problems with a few of the programs they tried to run, but it was basically the first laptop to support Win11/ARM and that's when Microsoft launched their emulator for x86-64. Prior to that, they only supported running 32-bit x86 code on ARM. So, one might hope those early issues have been sorted out, to some extent.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Brian D Smith said:
    BDSSNOPES must label the headline FALSE. The 7045 is the top end AMD laptop processer.
    I think the article is right on what some might consider a technicality. They used the word "APU", which doesn't really apply to the 7045.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    bit_user said:
    You can look at reviews of the Lenovo Thinkpad X13S. That's a Win11/ARM laptop, based on the Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3. I think I recall NotebookCheck's review saying they had compatibility problems with a few of the programs they tried to run, but it was basically the first laptop to support Win11/ARM and that's when Microsoft launched their emulator for x86-64. Prior to that, they only supported running 32-bit x86 code on ARM. So, one might hope those early issues have been sorted out, to some extent.
    And according to a How To Geek article from last week the translation layer currently available is still an effective steaming pile of poo compared to Apple's Rosetta 2 translation layer. But since this processor won't be out until likely 24H2 time, a supposedly massive overhaul of Windows 11 will hopefully improve the translation layer if Microsoft has any hope of making Windows On Arm, and potentially a new fully featured Windows Phone, a reality, or a joke.
    Reply