Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite for PCs Has 12 Oryon Cores, Tops Out at 4.3 GHz

Qualcomm
(Image credit: Qualcomm)

Qualcomm is taking another stab at an Arm PC system-on-a chip, this time based on the new Oryon cores that come from its purchase of Nuvia. The new chip, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite, will launch in laptops in mid-2024 and was unveiled today at the company's annual conference in Hawaii.

The chips are the latest volley in the attempt to successfully move more Windows users onto Arm. While the operating system support is there, there have been performance and compatibility issues with the Snapdragon 8cx chips. Now, Qualcomm says that Snapdragon X Elite will deliver far better efficiency with equivalent or better performance than competitors (a claim we'll have to test next year).

"We believe that this is like a pivotal moment for us," Kedar Kondap, senior vice president and general manager of compute and gaming at Qualcomm told Tom's Hardware in an interview. "Because what you will see with the Snapdragon X Elite platform is something you haven't seen before in terms of leadership, in terms of technology, performance per watt. You'll see the Qualcomm Oryon CPU distinguish itself in terms of its capabilities and the efficiency that it will drive."

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • thestryker
    It seems like these are aiming square at AMD/Intel laptops in the business and productivity area. I do wish they scaled up the memory bandwidth a bit, similarly to Apple, so that the graphics had more to work with. That being said these still ought to really put pressure on AMD/Intel to improve efficiency and hopefully that will have impact on the entire product stacks.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    The fireworks between ARM and Qualcomm might be getting a lot brighter after this announcement. I'll be curious if these processors actually ship if they can't resolve their differences by the ship date.
    Reply
  • ivan_vy
    year by year we keep hearing ARM new revolution in PC space yet never comes. Need to convince big OEM players first to make things happen.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    JamesJones44 said:
    The fireworks between ARM and Qualcomm might be getting a lot brighter after this announcement. I'll be curious if these processors actually ship if they can't resolve their differences by the ship date.
    They would need an injunction to stop them, and I don't believe they have one.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    thestryker said:
    They would need an injunction to stop them, and I don't believe they have one.
    I think at this point ARM has been negotiating in "good faith", but ARM has threatened to cancel Qualcomm's license if Qualcomm continues to develop Nuvia based processors.

    https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/16/arm_qualcomm_licensing_latest/
    Reply
  • ThomasKinsley
    I'm not too sure about Qualcomm, but this is great news for ARM. I heard MediaTek has announced that they are getting into the desktop market as well. x86 has had a great run, but with all of the recent exploits (Spectre, Meltdown, Downfall Inception, Zenbleed, etc.) and scummy business practices, I am ready to move on, even if it's just to voice my frustration with the current trend.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    JamesJones44 said:
    I think at this point ARM has been negotiating in "good faith", but ARM has threatened to cancel Qualcomm's license if Qualcomm continues to develop Nuvia based processors.

    https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/16/arm_qualcomm_licensing_latest/
    It doesn't matter, because that would just start a massive new lawsuit and have no impact on Qualcomm's ability to produce these chips. The only way for Arm to stop this is by getting an injunction from the court which is very much unlikely and the AvQ trial date (last information I saw) isn't until Sept 2024 which will be well after these have shipped. Should Arm actually win the case Qualcomm might be in trouble to some degree, but how much would depend on the ruling.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    ThomasKinsley said:
    I'm not too sure about Qualcomm, but this is great news for ARM. I heard MediaTek has announced that they are getting into the desktop market as well. x86 has had a great run, but with all of the recent exploits (Spectre, Meltdown, Downfall Inception, Zenbleed, etc.) and scummy business practices, I am ready to move on, even if it's just to voice my frustration with the current trend.
    I thought that ARM was also vulnerable to a lot of those as well. They just didn't get patches.
    Reply
  • MartianM
    thestryker said:
    It seems like these are aiming square at AMD/Intel laptops in the business and productivity area. I do wish they scaled up the memory bandwidth a bit, similarly to Apple, so that the graphics had more to work with. That being said these still ought to really put pressure on AMD/Intel to improve efficiency and hopefully that will have impact on the entire product stacks.
    AMD have a strong roadmap for improving efficiency with Zen 4, 5 and beyond. Intel Meteor Lake (15th gen?) should bump both efficiency and iGPU performance & performance/watt.

    What I find interesting is that Nuvia claimed they could design a better core than Apple, and with all the resources of Qualcomm, a 12x perf core chip can only do 50% better than an M2 4+4 chip. So 8 Nuvia cores matches 5-6 equivalent M2 perf cores, the M3 bumps this to 4-5 equivalent cores next week, and it isn’t out until mid next year. They are still multiple years behind Apple, just like in their phone performance cores.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    MartianM said:
    AMD have a strong roadmap for improving efficiency with Zen 4, 5 and beyond. Intel Meteor Lake (15th gen?) should bump both efficiency and iGPU performance & performance/watt.
    While Qualcomm has said nothing about single core (I bet AMD is probably almost as good, or maybe even better here) the multicore comparison is very good. A lot of work will need to be done to close that gap in laptop processors.

    Barring a miracle they won't be anywhere near the performance level Qualcomm is claiming here graphics wise. They're comparing with AMD's current top IGP, though with slow DRAM, and have a significant lead. Based on what I've seen DRAM scaling wise the AMD part stands to gain 10-20% performance which means Qualcomm would still be looking at 40-50% more performance. That isn't a gap Intel or AMD will be closing any time soon.
    MartianM said:
    What I find interesting is that Nuvia claimed they could design a better core than Apple, and with all the resources of Qualcomm, a 12x perf core chip can only do 50% better than an M2 4+4 chip.
    What we're seeing here is Nuvia's server core adapted to a laptop format. The next one ought to be showing a lot more of Qualcomm's design influence. I think it'll also depend on whether or not they continue to do high end Snapdragon chips based on Arm's reference design as well.
    MartianM said:
    So 8 Nuvia cores matches 5-6 equivalent M2 perf cores, the M3 bumps this to 4-5 equivalent cores next week, and it isn’t out until mid next year. They are still multiple years behind Apple, just like in their phone performance cores.
    This is pure guess work as we don't actually know how good Apple's performance cores are in isolation. Not to mention nobody knows what sort of performance increase lies with M3. That's not to say you're wrong just that we have no actual information yet.

    Qualcomm also doesn't have to compete with Apple in this space just AMD and Intel. They need to have a product that offers real advantages without a price premium which may have impacted their design.
    Reply