More affordable Strix Halo model emerges — Early Ryzen AI Max 385 Geekbench result reveals an eight-core option

AMD Strix Halo Ryzen AI Max
(Image credit: AMD)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • Notton
    I would guess the difference is caused by Cache size.
    It's 80MB for 395 and 40MB for 385
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Notton said:
    I would guess the difference is caused by Cache size.
    It's 80MB for 395 and 40MB for 385
    That won't affect single-core performance, since a core only has direct access to the L3 cache on its CCD (which is 32 MB, in each case).

    Even multi-threaded performance doesn't really benefit from the extra cache, other than a bump when you go from one CCD to two, because what usually matters is the per-core L3 cache.
    Reply
  • usertests
    It's an anomalous result, and the graphics performance is where the real action is. Even AI users probably won't care about this SKU unless it's often paired with 64-128 GB and offered significantly cheaper.
    Reply