Report: Acer Nukes Smartphone Launch Due to Google Threat

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • deadlockedworld
    I'm pretty sure Intel lost some big lawsuits for exactly this.
    Reply
  • johnners2981
    Meh, as long as it wasn't apple I don't need my pitchfork
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    If that OS is an Android rip off, what did you expect?

    Cheers!
    Reply
  • blazorthon
    What an interesting situation. Is Google's threat fair?
    Reply
  • boiler1990
    Isn't this the definition of stifling competition?
    Reply
  • metallifux
    Android is open source so i'm thinking this is BS
    Reply
  • jimmyjohnz
    metallifuxAndroid is open source so i'm thinking this is BS
    I'm pretty sure Google has teams that go and work with other companies to build android for different devices though. It sounds like they're threatening to cut off support to Acer in this way, not deny them access to Android itself.
    Reply
  • teh_chem
    Pretty mean. The story implies back-door pressure from Google, but I wonder if there is wording in the actual business agreements between Acer and Google that essentially prevents them from making another phone while still collaborating with and making Android devices.

    But let's face it--Acer's hardware sucks. Intervention of Google aside, it probably would have sucked regardless.

    Reply
  • samwelaye
    Alibaba is saying Google told Acer not to do it. Acer has not officially said it and neither has Google, so for all we know there is more behind this.
    Reply
  • internetlad
    I saw the word "Nuke(s)" in the title and immediately knew who wrote this and the quality of the article.
    Reply