Intel's First Phone is the Xolo X900, On Sale April 23

33

When Intel announced the first Medfield-powered phone at CES 2012 this past January, the phone the company had on stage was Kenovo's K800. Last week, Intel's Sean Maloney confirmed that the K800 would launch in May. However, recent comments made by Intel CEO Paul Otellini implied that the first Medfield phone would launch this week. Though most people assumed this meant the K800 would be hitting sooner than Maloney thought, it seems Otellini was talking about a different phone altogether.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • halcyon
    I like how its only available in India. Is that supposed to be some kind of test market?
    Reply
  • sharpiedpanda
    Maybe they are testing the functionality of the hardware over there and bringing it to the states when Windows 8 launches
    Reply
  • vilenjan
    Considering the number of Intel employees that come from India, its like a national brand there :P
    Reply
  • halcyon
    From what I can discern this phone looks like another "me-too" device. I think if you dislike Apple these "me-too" devices may be appealing. However, being brand agnostic, the Razr/Razr Maxx were the only compelling (and non-plastic cased) Android phones I really liked enough to spend money on. ...too bad the screens really left a lot to be desired.
    Reply
  • classzero
    India can keep that atom phone
    Reply
  • besplatan
    I don't really care about an x86 phone. There shouldn't be any advantage in having the same architecture or OS on all your devices. Instead, the same services and apps should be available on all devices, so we don't get locked in to a specific hardware or OS manufacturer.
    Reply
  • ojas
    lol now why haven't i heard of this till now? Should be interesting, 22k is the Lumia 800's price.

    India a test market? We've more phone users than the US. More people than the US. No carriers complaining of spectrum shortage. Extremely cheap calling rates. NO crappy contracts except on iCrap and a tiny minority of other handsets (i think the ZTE Blade is ONE other example i can think of) and tablets selling as cheap as $60.

    Test market? lmao. The phone could be a pilot unit (hence the local manufacturer), but Intel and China are markets manufacturers want to expand, not "test".

    Anyway, i think this may actually sell pretty well, seeing how popular Android (and Intel) is here. Plus OTA ICS is a win, and i don't know of any 22k Android phone with ICS coming its way (maybe some samsungs? idk, haven't heard of any so far)

    And a 1.6 GHz Atom is weak for a cell phone? I think Android is bigger bottleneck than the processor.
    Reply
  • dosdecarnitas
    SOLD!!! sign me up for one
    Reply
  • A user should never care what is inside their phone. They should care about the service and the reliability. Whether it is ARM or Intel shouldn't really matter. The more competition the better so may ARM and Intel clash for decades. It will be good for the consumer.
    Reply
  • dosdecarnitas
    dosdecarnitasSOLD!!! sign me up for one
    thats because my Iphone 4 just blew up
    Reply