Minecraft Has Generated $80 Million in 15 Months

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • mrmike_49
    so how much of that $80 mil actually went to the game devs????
    Reply
  • plznote
    0_o
    Reply
  • zanny
    mrmike_49so how much of that $80 mil actually went to the game devs????
    Probably over 90%, since Notch has payment by credit card directly through the minecraft site, which he also owns. Notch by himself has at least a few million, since he had enough to fathom funding Psychonauts 2.
    Reply
  • zanny
    Note, they live in Sweden, so probably 1/3 to 1/2 their revenue went to taxes.
    Reply
  • lahawzel
    "Statistics

    25,079,091 registered users, of which 5,374,920 (21.43%) have bought the game."

    The game was ~$20 USD in beta, ~$30 now. Even assuming everyone paid Beta prices, this is still $27 million more than the $80 million reported here. Why the discrepancy?
    Reply
  • trumpeter1994
    imagine how much it would have made if it had always been the same price as it is now (since it was cheaper in alpha and beta).
    Reply
  • classzero
    I just do not get the minecraft thing. I tried it when it was free (beta). I have seen people use the paid version. I personally cannot justify spending money on this. If I ever get bored to the point of wanting to play minecraft I will download the Unity engine (free) and "create" something for real. Heck even the Unity tutorials are more entertaining than minecraft. It's just not for me, but go ahead and . . . mine?
    Reply
  • trumpeter1994
    LaHawzel"Statistics25,079,091 registered users, of which 5,374,920 (21.43%) have bought the game."The game was ~$20 USD in beta, ~$30 now. Even assuming everyone paid Beta prices, this is still $27 million more than the $80 million reported here. Why the discrepancy?I believe the game was ~$10 when it was in alpha and that was released well over 15 months ago so that is probably why.
    Reply
  • N.Broekhuijsen
    LaHawzel"Statistics25,079,091 registered users, of which 5,374,920 (21.43%) have bought the game."The game was ~$20 USD in beta, ~$30 now. Even assuming everyone paid Beta prices, this is still $27 million more than the $80 million reported here. Why the discrepancy?I believe the game was around 10 or 15 bucks during alpha.
    Reply
  • N.Broekhuijsen
    ClasszeroI just do not get the minecraft thing. I tried it when it was free (beta). I have seen people use the paid version. I personally cannot justify spending money on this. If I ever get bored to the point of wanting to play minecraft I will download the Unity engine (free) and "create" something for real. Heck even the Unity tutorials are more entertaining than minecraft. It's just not for me, but go ahead and . . . mine?Then you didn't try the paid version, and what you played wasn't beta if it was free. It was probably just the alpha version on their website, which is a lot worse.
    Reply