Regulators Ask Smartphone Manufacturers To Reduce Driving Accidents

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • mspencerl87
    Why not ask food makers to stop making people fat?
    Or why not ask automobile makers to ask teachers to stop making people stupid?
    Reply
  • surphninja
    By the time this technology can be perfected and rolled out, no one will be driving cars.
    Reply
  • jonny27
    I don't get what's so hard about doing what almost every other country already does, and prohibit using the phone while driving.
    Reply
  • Hellcatm
    Wouldn't it have been better to ask the companies that make the OS. Really what are the phone manufacturers going to do? Add more shit to their already crappy skin? Sure they can some how make it so when you're in the car your phone doesn't work but if they do that then the passenger wouldn't be able to use their phone. There are apps for your phone when you're in the car that have big buttons for the functions you need but I'm guessing people don't use them. Also Google doesn't have voice texting built in, you need to download an app that will help you with it and its still not great. Windows Phone's approach was much better. You get a message, it asks if you want to read it, you say yes it reads it and asks if you want to reply, if you say yes it lets you reply and then send. So if you have your phone connected to a headset or bluetooth device it would do this automatically.
    Reply
  • targetdrone
    Typical Leftist nonsense. Go after an inanimate object and not the stupid, irresponsible "people" that are unfit to live in society because they cause death, destruction, and mayhem instead.
    Reply
  • targetdrone
    18907015 said:
    I don't get what's so hard about doing what almost every other country already does, and prohibit using the phone while driving.


    Yeah I'm sure that works as well as posting signs that you're not allowed to drive above 55 miles per hour.
    Reply
  • targetdrone
    The agency said 10% of the 35,092 fatal traffic accidents in 2015 resulted from distracted driving; another 16% of non-fatal collisions involved at least one driver whose eyes weren't on the road..


    How many of those accidents were caused by people on their phones vs other forms of distracted driving, like changing the radio station, futzing with the GPS, swigging a Big Gulp in one hand while eating a meat ball sub in the other, putting on make-up or day-dreaming?
    Reply
  • PC-Cobbler
    "people look away from the road for 23 seconds on average when they send or receive a text message ... it also wants concrete tasks, like picking a song, to take no more than 12 seconds to complete""

    12 seconds is 1/2 23 seconds and that's the limit the NHTSA wants to establish? Imagine how many school children could be killed in 12 seconds, let alone 23.

    Research has proven that texting while driving is worse than DUI with respect to response time. Make the penalties for texting the same as for DUI, with no plea bargains allowed. Allow police officers to stop someone for suspected texting.
    Reply
  • jonny27
    18907077 said:
    Yeah I'm sure that works as well as posting signs that you're not allowed to drive above 55 miles per hour.

    As someone who lives in a country that enforces this, it does. Getting caught talking on the phone or texting grants you an instant 125€ fine minimum, and we have a low count of accidents by distraction. Hands free car kits are obviously allowed, and encouraged to use.
    Reply
  • anbello262
    18906928 said:
    Why not ask food makers to stop making people fat?
    Or why not ask automobile makers to ask teachers to stop making people stupid?

    Because being fat only kills you. Driving while texting kills other innocent people.
    Reply