Worldwide HDD revenue charted from 1957 to the present – AI boom expected to halt decline this year

Seagate
(Image credit: Seagate)

Tracking the ups and downs of the hard disk drive (HDD) industry's lengthy history isn't easy. HDDs were introduced in 1956 by IBM and have endured while a series of tech industry analyst firms charting the revenue and sales volume of the mechanical storage segment has come and gone. However, Tom Coughlin, President of Coughlin Associates and a storage analyst and consultant, recently shared some illuminating HDD industry performance charts spanning the whole 67 years to the present day. He collaborated with a hard disk business colleague, Tom Gardner, to produce the graphics below.

You can see the best estimates that we have of HDD industry revenue to the present day. Gardner color-coded the data from the various analyst firms, showing some uneven overlaps across the multiple eras. While the linear chart shows some glitches in collating revenue across the different analyst firms, the logarithmic vertical scale chart illustrates the revenue trend to the present day is much smoother and more predictable.

Both charts clearly show peak revenue for the HDD industry was reached in 2012. Coughlin notes that peak shipment volumes for HDDs were seen in 2010. So, why this disparity? Those who have been into PC DIY for 15 years or more will probably remember the Thai floods in 2011, which caused HDD shortages and thus impacted supply/demand to influence pricing.

Another interesting observation by Coughlin is that while we see the decline in HDD revenues and shipment volumes, “HDD prices have been generally increasing.” The storage analyst explains that as SSDs have displaced HDDs in lower storage capacity requirement consumer devices, the market has become skewed towards high-capacity devices.

It is plain to see from Gardner’s charts that the fortunes of the HDD industry are still in a phase where we are witnessing rapid declines. “In 2022 HDD total shipments were 172 million units and $20.4 billion,” Coughlin notes. “We estimate that unit shipments in 2023 will total about 127 million units with total revenues less than $14 billion.” Most would agree that is a sleep slide.

2024: AI boom to the rescue

However, it isn’t the end of what has affectionately become known as spinning rust. According to the source, 2024 will be a good year for all types of storage device makers. You guessed it, the AI boom will cause increased demand for both NAND Flash and HDD storage.

In the coming year, the remaining HDD manufacturers are projected to ship 127 million units (around 900 Exabytes of data capacity) with revenues of just under $14 billion. The figures are eerily similar to last year, but at least the steep decline will have ceased, for now.

Mark Tyson
Freelance News Writer

Mark Tyson is a Freelance News Writer at Tom's Hardware US. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Avro Arrow
    I remember the good old days when HDDs were made by more competitors than today. Names like Kalok, MicropΩlis, Quantum and Maxtor were commonplace along with Seagate, WD and IBM.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    When I first started buying hardware Maxtor was by far the best consumer available drive. IBM rivaled them, but their consumer presence was basically zero and didn't really pop up until Hitachi bought their HDD business. It was a pretty wild time with rapid development of higher performance PATA with the introduction of UDMA. Then it was all supplanted by SATA which went from 150MB/s to 300MB/s pretty quickly before going to 600MB/s and staying there.

    Things were certainly more interesting then, but now the only thing I'm concerned about is consumer level pricing.
    Reply
  • fireaza
    Avro Arrow said:
    I remember the good old days when HDDs were made by more competitors than today. Names like Kalok, MicropΩlis, Quantum and Maxtor were commonplace along with Seagate, WD and IBM.
    Samsung too! Their drives used to be inexpensive but also good quality.
    Reply
  • Avro Arrow
    fireaza said:
    Samsung too! Their drives used to be inexpensive but also good quality.
    ABSOLUTELY! The only reason I didn't mention them or Fujitsu is that, IIRC, they still make hard drives but not in the consumer market so they're not completely dead like Kalok, MicropΩlis, Quantum and Maxtor. :giggle:

    To be honest, I'm not sure about Hitachi or Toshiba either.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Avro Arrow said:
    ABSOLUTELY! The only reason I didn't mention them or Fujitsu is that, IIRC, they still make hard drives but not in the consumer market so they're not completely dead like Kalok, MicropΩlis, Quantum and Maxtor. :giggle:

    To be honest, I'm not sure about Hitachi or Toshiba either.
    Fujitsu sold their HDD unit to Toshiba who still makes HDDs, Hitachi sold theirs to WD and Samsung sold theirs to Seagate.
    Reply
  • Avro Arrow
    thestryker said:
    Fujitsu sold their HDD unit to Toshiba who still makes HDDs, Hitachi sold theirs to WD and Samsung sold theirs to Seagate.
    Ah yes, just what we consumers need... more market consolidation. :rolleyes:

    This is why capitalism results in monopoly or close enough to it to have the same effect.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Avro Arrow said:
    Ah yes, just what we consumers need... more market consolidation. :rolleyes:
    Yeah that's why when people complain about NAND pricing going back up I cringe a bit. The HDD and DRAM markets are what you get when there's a race to the bottom. 3 companies making HDDs and 3 companies having over 95% of the DRAM market. So long as the prices don't get to absurd levels I'd rather pay more for stuff using NAND than watch more consolidation happening there (which has already started).
    Reply
  • Avro Arrow
    thestryker said:
    Yeah that's why when people complain about NAND pricing going back up I cringe a bit. The HDD and DRAM markets are what you get when there's a race to the bottom. 3 companies making HDDs and 3 companies having over 95% of the DRAM market. So long as the prices don't get to absurd levels I'd rather pay more for stuff using NAND than watch more consolidation happening there (which has already started).
    I agree. An even more glaring example is the GPU market. One company basically controls what video cards cost across the board and the other just makes sure that they're gouging consumers noticeably less than the market leader. It's like how auto parts stores price their parts based on what the dealers want for them.

    When our economic system rewards socipathic and/or greedy behaviour, you know that we're doomed in the long run. :rolleyes:
    Reply
  • thestryker
    While the end result is arguably worse at least the video card industry was caused by everyone failing rather than a race to the bottom causing consolidation!
    Reply