AMD: It Won't Be About 'AMD vs. Intel' Anymore

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • rsktek
    So Intel won... for good. :/
    Reply
  • LORD_ORION
    We are rolling over, because we are dead.
    Reply
  • rantoc
    And in later news Intel raises the cpu prices by 200% over a 3 year period and Ivy bridge is delayed 5 years and after that its 33mhz increases for 1000$ each!
    Reply
  • gmcizzle
    Yeah, it'll be Intel vs. Intel lol.
    Reply
  • Time to Intel chips price Skyrocket
    Reply
  • Thunderfox
    I know Intel is top dog, but still, if they are this far behind Intel, how are they going to compete with anybody else?

    Imagine how much better ATI would be doing if it didn't have to prop up AMD.
    Reply
  • beardguy
    Good plan. I think coming to this realization is healthy for AMD. I love AMD but with the current line of Intel processors, there is just no compelling reason to buy AMD over Intel.

    Hopefully this new strategy will help them become a leader with a different focus. I almost got a job with AMD a few years back, glad I didn't now since they just laid off 1,400 people ... ouch!
    Reply
  • zooted
    Sad.
    Reply
  • theuniquegamer
    I think its now intel vs ARM in mobile and server segment(in future) vs amd in mobile segment (in desktop segment amd is 2 step behind intel). I am waiting to upgrade my phenom ii x4 955 to any future amd good gaming cpu(if it is a proper replacement for current phenom ii)
    Reply
  • masterasia
    That means Ivy Bridge will now be twice as expensive.
    Reply