Skip to main content

AMD: It Won't Be About 'AMD vs. Intel' Anymore

In a recent interview with the San Jose Mercury News, AMD spokesman Mike Silverman indicated that the company plans to shift its focus away from competing with long-time processor rival Intel starting in 2012. Instead, the company will likely focus on developing a solid mobile strategy while still remaining committed to the x86 architecture.

"We're at an inflection point," he said. "We will all need to let go of the old 'AMD versus Intel' mind-set, because it won't be about that anymore."

The move isn't surprising given that the company hasn't been able to gain a market share lead over Intel in years. AMD had hoped to gain some ground after Intel suffered a string of antitrust regulatory rebukes, but the processor nemesis remained vigilant, its sales booming. Last year Intel reported sales of nearly $44 billion whereas AMD only reported $6.5 billion.

Presently AMD sits at around 19-percent of the overall processor market share, down from a 23-percent share in 2006. The company has been chided for heavily depending on a PC market where the pace of growth has slowed due to the economy and emerging markets. It's recently-launched Bulldozer chips even brought in disappointing reviews, and the company just recently cut 1,400 jobs.

Given that its fight with Intel has seemingly gotten AMD nowhere, time has come for a change. "AMD is a leader in x86 microprocessor design, and we remain committed to the x86 market," AMD said in a statement this week. "Our strategy is to accelerate our growth by taking advantage of our design capabilities to deliver a breadth of products that best align with broader industry shifts toward low power, emerging markets and the cloud."

The "emerging markets" -- presumably smartphones and tablets -- is a space where both Intel and AMD will fight to survive, a space currently dominated by ARM's low-power architecture. There's also the new ultrabook market which requires low-power solutions to keep the overall prices down and battery life extended. These three markets alone are untapped veins of possible revenue for the company, and as AMD pointed out, three avenues that are currently the industry's primary focus.

Yet back in August, Rick Bergman, senior VP and general manager of AMD’s Product Group, said that the company had no plans to enter the smartphone sector. "We haven’t announced any plans to go in that handheld space," Bergman said. "We’ve got plenty of opportunities… in server, notebook and now tablets, that’s our immediate focus. But if the right circumstances come up and we can see a way to impact the market, we’ll obviously continue to look."

On the tablet front, AMD launched the Z-Series Bobcat-based APUs during Computex 2011 back in June. The first chip, the AMD Z-01, features two 1 GHz Bobcat cores, a TDP of 5.9W, 1 MB of L2 cache and AMD Radeon HD 6250 discrete-class graphics (276 MHz, 80 cores). By comparison, Nvidia just launched its ARM-based Tegra 3 SoC featuring a quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore (up to 1.4 GHz single-core mode and 1.3 GHz multi-core mode), a 12-core GeForce GPU, 1 MB of L2 cache, and a TDP of around 4W.

AMD is expected to update its strategy in February 2012, but there's a good chance we'll learn more during CES 2012 in January.

  • rsktek
    So Intel won... for good. :/
    Reply
  • LORD_ORION
    We are rolling over, because we are dead.
    Reply
  • rantoc
    And in later news Intel raises the cpu prices by 200% over a 3 year period and Ivy bridge is delayed 5 years and after that its 33mhz increases for 1000$ each!
    Reply
  • gmcizzle
    Yeah, it'll be Intel vs. Intel lol.
    Reply
  • Time to Intel chips price Skyrocket
    Reply
  • Thunderfox
    I know Intel is top dog, but still, if they are this far behind Intel, how are they going to compete with anybody else?

    Imagine how much better ATI would be doing if it didn't have to prop up AMD.
    Reply
  • beardguy
    Good plan. I think coming to this realization is healthy for AMD. I love AMD but with the current line of Intel processors, there is just no compelling reason to buy AMD over Intel.

    Hopefully this new strategy will help them become a leader with a different focus. I almost got a job with AMD a few years back, glad I didn't now since they just laid off 1,400 people ... ouch!
    Reply
  • zooted
    Sad.
    Reply
  • theuniquegamer
    I think its now intel vs ARM in mobile and server segment(in future) vs amd in mobile segment (in desktop segment amd is 2 step behind intel). I am waiting to upgrade my phenom ii x4 955 to any future amd good gaming cpu(if it is a proper replacement for current phenom ii)
    Reply
  • masterasia
    That means Ivy Bridge will now be twice as expensive.
    Reply