Skip to main content

SMS Spammers Fined £440,000 in United Kingdom

If you've got a cell phone, chances are, you've been hit with a spam message or two over the years. The UK's Information Commission is determined to crack down on illegal texts and phones, and latest efforts have seen two men fined nearly half a million pounds sterling for sending hundreds of thousands of text messages to mobile phone users.

The ICO reports that Christopher Niebel and Gary McNeish ran a marketing company called Tetrus Telecoms. The company was in the business of sending out thousands of unsolicited SMS messages for its clients. The ICO says they did this without the consent of the recipient and without identifying the sender, both of which are legal requirements under the PECR (the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations). Messages sent to consumers includes accident claims ads and texts stating the recipient was entitled to compensation for past loans.

The ICO's investigation found evidence that showed Tetrus was using unregistered pay as you go SIM cards to send up to 840,000 text messages per day with an income of £7,000 - £8,000 a day. Niebel was ordered to pay a penalty of £300,000, while his partner McNeish was been fined £140,000.

The Information Commissioner's office said that it received 400 complaints relating to Tetrus and reminded people that the best course of action for unsolicited text messages is to ignore them.

"Our message to the public is that if you don't know who sent you a text message then do not respond, otherwise your details may be used to generate profits for these unscrupulous individuals. Together we can put an end to this unlawful industry that continues to plague our daily lives," The Information Commissioner said.

In addition to the fines, McNeish and Niebel will face prosecution for failing to notify the ICO that their company, Tetrus Telecoms, was processing personal information (a legal requirement under the information act).

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback           

  • mrmaia
    So they'll just pay the fine (less than two months worth of work) and get out clean like that? Man, this spam stuff is lucrative.
    Reply
  • nuvon
    Can you please do the same to internet spammers? maybe double the amount. Thank you!
    Reply
  • freggo
    Fines are not enough to discourage these individuals.
    Serious Prison time should be mandatory; and I am not talking country club prison either.
    Reply
  • tburns1
    freggoFines are not enough to discourage these individuals. Serious Prison time should be mandatory; and I am not talking country club prison either.Yup. They should share a cell with a 300 pound guy named Bubba, who sure thinks they are "purdy" ...
    Reply
  • evilsizer
    So it's illegal for spammers to harass people, but not illegal for the media to pay off cops and hack victums phones.
    Reply
  • f-14
    Spammers earned thousands by sending junky test messages.

    this is a test, only a test of the emergency broadcast system.........
    was it really just a test to find valid ID's so they could sell that info to hackers, other spammers?

    The Information Commissioner's office said that it received 400 complaints relating to Tetrus and reminded people that the best course of action for unsolicited text messages is to ignore them.

    sounds like The Information Commissioner's office doesn't want to have to work and get off their lazy butts and shut these spammers down and have to deal with the people who pay their salaries to do just that!
    Reply
  • f-14
    hahaha ^5 jane u just beat me to it on the page reload after i hit send after reloading the page before i hit send.
    Reply
  • freggo
    taylorlautner3211my buddy's sister makes $75/hour on the internet...
    Spam in an article about spammers... These people stop at nothing :-)


    Reply
  • zrobbb
    my mums, sisters, step-sons, dads, butchers fish makes $6789765 per hour on his PC...
    Reply
  • devBunny
    A £440,000 fine / £8000 earnings per day is 55 days worth. How pathetic is that?!
    Reply