AMD's Hector Ruiz Jumps Sinking Ship

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Wolfgang Gruener
Contributor

Wolfgang Gruener is an experienced professional in digital strategy and content, specializing in web strategy, content architecture, user experience, and applying AI in content operations within the insurtech industry. His previous roles include Director, Digital Strategy and Content Experience at American Eagle, Managing Editor at TG Daily, and contributing to publications like Tom's Guide and Tom's Hardware.

  • mgl888
    Sad...

    Intel monopoly definitely won't be very fun
    Reply
  • ImSpartacus
    I think AMD will stay afloat. The 48*0's are phenomenal, and if they can push a 45nm shrink fast enough they may catch up with big ol' Intel in good time.

    I don't see them leading Intel until a few years, but they will survive.
    Reply
  • caamsa
    Sad indeed. I have owned mostly AMD processors and have enjoyed them very much. I hope that AMD can make a come back as it would be boring and probably more expensive with just Intell to deal with. I know I will get flack for saying this this but I a certain that Intell was not playing fair prior to the release of its core2 processor. Now they do have the better product but prior to core2 they used some muscle to keep themselves on top ie the antitrust case.
    Reply
  • mr roboto
    ^^I second that.
    Reply
  • lobhob
    There is a very strict timeline set by shareholders for Intel to release and engineer their processors and top heads at Intel would easily be fired if they strayed from it. Also Intel wouldn't be able to sell any processors if they keep very similar performing processors year after because there would be no need for people to buy they same exact computer. So don't give me any bs that no AMD would ruin to future computer market because Intel wouldn't be around if they stopped increasing their cpus performance and go down the drains themselves. Also AMD's timeline sucks cause its not like Intels at all, AMD's shareholders need to be pressuring tops heads at AMD like Intel's shareholders do.
    Reply
  • thomasxstewart
    From year ago, much of base product is gone with little replacement public wants. dual processors just didn't have numbers to justify beyond X2. Keeping Up with Nvidia is like bucking bronco.

    Its strong company that engineering has lead to slow spot, Vista may Be That Slow Spot. Barcelona Was Night Mare. Leaving open spot.

    Knocking Buck out of competitors pockets is Great Thing. MEDIA IS RISING.People LIKE AMD More Today Than EVER.

    Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
    Reply
  • resonance451
    I've been buying mostly Intel products lately, though I'm considering building myself AMD systems and recommending them to people I build systems for. Now that AMD is finally somewhat competitive, I can justify it. And if that's what it takes to keep AMD afloat, I'm certainly willing. I love my Intel but I won't deal with a monopoly.
    Reply
  • pogsnet
    Yay! Fanboi, competition is good to be precise, like what happen to Nvidia recently even though they have this latest and the fastest product but because of AMD/ATI competitive pricing/performance they have to reduce prices like an axe slashing at large chunk in just few weeks from launching.
    Reply
  • goonting
    I dop hope AMD introduces great processor this year that would keep it close with Intel... I used Athlon Processors in the Office way back 2003... They were better than Intel then
    Reply
  • tagasur
    thg's fanboyism reveals itself in the last sentence..

    "An Intel-only world would be boring and certainly not offer the excitement we have seen in the past two years."

    ..means to say that thg wasn't really excited when AMD brought Intel "to its knees" in 2005 and when AMD introduced the K8 architecture that pushed Intel to improve.

    Is thg becoming the faux news network of technology?
    Reply