BlackBerry's Back: The Android-Powered Priv, First Hands-On Impressions

When we were in Barcelona way back in February, Ron Louks, BlackBerry's head of devices, briefly teased a curved-screen slider phone at the end of its Mobile World Congress presentation. It looked very slick, a potential comeback device, but the brief reveal left us with many questions that wouldn't be answered for months. Still, it gave die-hard BlackBerry fans hope that it could still pull something amazing out of the bag after its slow and steady decline in handset market share.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • BoredSysAdmin
    The Passport’s 13MP camera was the first that BlackBerry seemed to pay a bit more attention to, having OIS (optical image stabilization) and an f/2.0 lens, and the Priv’s is even better (on paper). It’s certified by Schneider-Kreuznach and has OIS, PDAF (phase detect autofocus), a 6-element f/2.2 lens.....":

    f/2.2 lens is not better than f/2.0 - it's quite the opposite.
    Lower f-stop number = wider open aperture = more light comes in = Low light ISO could be decreased = The captured photo is less likely to have noise coming from high iso due to sensor limitations.

    LG G4 with similar (if not same sensor) but with f-stop of 1.8 can do much better low light images than f2.2
    Reply
  • alex davies
    The Passport’s 13MP camera was the first that BlackBerry seemed to pay a bit more attention to, having OIS (optical image stabilization) and an f/2.0 lens, and the Priv’s is even better (on paper). It’s certified by Schneider-Kreuznach and has OIS, PDAF (phase detect autofocus), a 6-element f/2.2 lens.....":

    f/2.2 lens is not better than f/2.0 - it's quite the opposite.
    Lower f-stop number = wider open aperture = more light comes in = Low light ISO could be decreased = The captured photo is less likely to have noise coming from high iso due to sensor limitations.

    LG G4 with similar (if not same sensor) but with f-stop of 1.8 can do much better low light images than f2.2

    Yes, you are correct in saying that the aperture on the Passport's camera is better than the Priv's, so we'll add a clarification to that section.

    However, due to the Priv's better image sensor we still expect its camera performance in all lighting conditions to be superior to the Passport's.
    Reply
  • OMGitsHUGE
    Great review, look forward to a follow up to test everything else. I do believe this is a great device, it might not save Blackberry, but who cares. I know I will be getting one. It might start a trend though with other manufacturers to add a physical keyboard. Look what happened back in 2011 when Samsung introduced the Phablet...
    Reply
  • michaelhi
    Re: fingerprint reader--this biometric detracts from security not adds, unless done in a way currently too advanced for this type of device.
    Reply
  • qisoed
    Nice review, and over all the priv could be the real new beginning of blackberry. They need to launch several device with different class price to be able make gain in android market battle since there are many players from big to small and from old to new one. And all claim they are the best.

    What i like is the security from blackberry, i used to use several blackberry device before swithing to android and know how your data can be safe in your hand, because for now I'm using chinese based android phone, some times i think they are already collecting all my username and password, Lol yea probably. I hope priv really make it in that area. I just hope it will launch in my country or nearby country so i can get 1.
    Reply
  • Orumus
    Re: fingerprint reader--this biometric detracts from security not adds, unless done in a way currently too advanced for this type of device.

    Yeah fingerprint scanners in mainstream devices is currently a joke. They add a false sense of security because of this "feature" to sell more units. Not to mention the potential security threat of companies and hackers gaining access to your bio metrics.
    Reply